Leaderboard
-
in all areas
- All areas
- Adverts
- Advert Questions
- Advert Reviews
- Videos
- Video Comments
- Blog Entries
- Blog Comments
- Images
- Image Comments
- Image Reviews
- Albums
- Album Comments
- Album Reviews
- Files
- File Comments
- File Reviews
- Dropzones
- Dropzone Comments
- Dropzone Reviews
- Gear
- Gear Comments
- Gear Reviews
- Articles
- Article Comments
- Article Reviews
- Fatalities
- Fatality Comments
- Fatality Reviews
- Stolen items
- Stolen item Comments
- Stolen item Reviews
- Records
- Record Comments
- Record Reviews
- Help Files
- Help File Comments
- Help File Reviews
- Events
- Event Comments
- Event Reviews
- Posts
- Status Updates
- Status Replies
-
Custom Date
-
All time
January 20 2016 - August 23 2025
-
Year
August 23 2024 - August 23 2025
-
Month
July 23 2025 - August 23 2025
-
Week
August 16 2025 - August 23 2025
-
Today
August 23 2025
-
Custom Date
10/03/2022 - 10/03/2022
-
All time
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 10/03/2022 in all areas
-
4 pointsThis is without a doubt one of the most methed up posts of random insanity drivel I've ever seen.
-
3 pointsWhat do "skill sets" have to do with refugees? If they're fleeing for self preservation and a safer life, why is acceptance dependent on their ability to perform? Why would any human rights be based on performance qualifiers??
-
3 pointsUnpopular opnion: I've stopped watching their content long agao, but I'm not sure that the Red Bull guys are doing our sport a favour.
-
2 pointsDo you actually expect 'better data' from someone who refuses to answer whether or not he's praise a Democrat in a position of power for the response to a disaster? Especially after giving huge praise to the guy who voted against relief funds for the Northeast after they had a huge storm? Fun fact: Florida's Republican senators sent a letter begging for money in the wake of the storm. THEY DAY AFTER they both voted against funding for... Storm relief. Data to support my claim: https://news.yahoo.com/florida-senators-request-more-federal-181521091.html
-
1 pointYeah. The idea that the Senators who represent FLORIDA voted against a bill funding storm relief the day BEFORE a major hurricane hits... Florida. Yep, that's pretty stupid. On the same level as someone voting against storm relief funding, then a few years later, when Governor, begs and pleads for aid money. I'm glad I'm not in charge. I'd have told DeSantis something like "I'll tell you what, I'll give you exactly what you were willing to give New York in the wake of Sandy. How about that?"
-
1 pointI was agreeing with the post.. but the evidence strongly supports right handed,, you can find it in here... there are three important pieces. https://vault.fbi.gov/D-B-Cooper ?b_start:int=40
-
1 pointEdwards got it wrong,, Sketch "B" was done as a process and it was derived from "KK5-1",,, there was not a separate sketch... The final sketch "B" incorporated all the witness inputs..
-
1 pointSince we moved from Central Florida to the mountains of North Carolina, I find myself, like you, going through more socks than I ever imagined. "Welcome back?" Albeit briefly.
-
1 pointSword Beach, June 6, 1944 Being part of an army of invasion is quite different from defending your own home:
-
1 pointThe Home Guard, England, 1940. Defending your own land is quite different from being part of an army of invasion.
-
1 pointConsider three cases. Case one - you join the military, are trained, and serve for a few years. Then a war starts. You fight in the war, do well and eventually retire. Case two - your country is invaded. You volunteer to serve, are trained quickly, given weapons and armor, and start fighting. Case three - your country invades another country. It goes poorly. Your son is conscripted, is not trained, and is put in the field with antique weapons that don't work. Which ones are you OK with?
-
1 pointTo me, there’s a difference between volunteering without qualifications for something like defending your homeland, and being conscripted to fight a war you have no direct interest in. Imagine if during Iraq (remember the “go about your business” approach) Bush had restarted the draft Wendy P.
-
1 pointDemand charges are set by either your maximum power draw or by when you use power. Often they are broken out into demand charges (set by maximum consumption) and time-of-use charges (set by when you use power.) Reducing your peak demand (via storage, or via energy management systems, or via efficiency improvements) will reduce demand charges, and charging at night will reduce TOU prices.
-
1 point
-
1 pointYes, in theory. But if he did without the advice of the PM it would likely lead to a crisis and the end of the monarchy. He has absolutely no real power.
-
1 pointThere are now BASE rigs with reserves. At least one that I am aware of is also TSO'd. The Red Bull guys have some that they use for low altitude wingsuit exhibition jumps at specified airshows. They have a waiver (by jumper name and venue) from USPA that allows them to deploy at 1,000 feet. The rigs are outfitted with MARDS for rapid reserve deployment.
-
1 pointThe use of dual parachute systems is an FAR (not a BSR) and thus not applicable outside the U.S.
-
1 pointDid you catch her getting dismembered on local radio? Would be funny if it wasn’t so tragic
-
1 pointBack to the immigrant thing: Imagine 50 people at a MAGA rally being told they were going to be taken to Mar A Lago, but then flying them to Venezuela instead.
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 pointMueller himself said something to the effect of: "If I had found there had been 'no collusion', I would have said that. There's a reason I didn't say that." Regarding Hilary Clinton: Abso-fucking-lutely hilarious that Trump promised to "Lock Her UP!!!!!!", yet with 4 years to sic his own Attorney General on her, he did NOTHING. Was Trump that incompetent? Was Barr that incompetent? Was Hilary innocent of all of Trump's accusations?
-
1 pointSlim King says he's read the emails. But he's not going to post what he read here, because that would just prove he's lying. But what he'll do is, "here, have a dozen more dodgy links and crappy videos instead!"
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 pointNobody on this forum is demanding a 'safe space' free of uncomfortable speech, but it gets pretty fucking tired when you and your ilk are running a 'flood the zone with shit' play. Most of us have better things to do than refute the putrid BS you post from the most vile corners of the Net, while you go around baselessly accusing anybody you don't agree with of being a pedo.
-
1 pointI don't like Hillary very much either, but comparing her to The Donald is like comparing someone who stole a Snickers bar to the mastermind of a heist of the bullion depository at Fort Knox. There's no suggestion that Hillary withheld anything from the National Archives, nor that she secreted away defense secrets. She hasn't stolen from a charity, run a fraudulent unversity, nor does she claim to now more about everything than anyone else in the world. Viewed objectively, there's simply no comparison.
-
1 pointWhy are you not adding Condoleezza Rice and Colin Powell to this list as well? (Don't think Hillary took any secrets home, the concern was around her email setup. But then I don't think facts really matter to you)
-
Newsletter