Leaderboard

The implication that there is a flood of kids regretting their transition and detransitioning is a right-wing myth. Recent studies (Gender Identity 5 Years After Social Transition | Pediatrics | American Academy of Pediatrics (aap.org)) show that the rate of youths who socially transition at a young age who then transition back are extremely low, in the vicinity of 2%, and that the vast majority of those who do so are doing it due to family pressure, not regret. For comparison, the average regret rate on all regular surgical procedures comes in at around 7%. Kids who identify as trans early on, almost universally continue that position. Using emotionally charged (and blatantly inaccurate) language like "vivisection" as opposition to this is a tell that you aren't looking for a scientific basis for your views, and likely consider that trans people are just doing these things for funsies. You're wrong.

Those who would force a rape victim to give birth against her will are just as evil as the rapist.

Laughably inaccurate take on what happened here. The vast majority of the LNP losses were to "teal" independents - conservative candidates who had basically all the same policy positions, with the exception that they wanted to take urgent action on climate change. The LNP didn't lose because they tried to go left, they lost because they stuck their heads in the sand and ignored the populace. Their reaction to this was that they think they weren't true enough to their "conservative" voters, which has no basis in fact or logic whatsoever.

That is why I think DeSantis is even more dangerous than Trump. He is just as vile, but not as goat-fuck stupid as Trump.

In years past republicans considered how to help other republicans do a good job, govern, pass laws that favor them etc. Today republicans consider only how to hurt the most democrats and democratic causes. When you drill down into any of their strategies, that's all there is to them. If Trump will hurt trans people/women/science/blacks then they support him.

Yes, it lies with the child and their parents. However, a two day old baby isn't going to add much to the discussion, so the parents will have to decide on their own. When the child is eight, then they are going to be able to add a lot more to the discussion - and should be PART OF (not the final word) the decision. (BTW I originally misread your reply, sorry.)

Offshore wind: $83/mwhr Nuclear power: $131-$204/mwhr https://www.lazard.com/perspective/levelized-cost-of-energy-levelized-cost-of-storage-and-levelized-cost-of-hydrogen/ I am sure you can come up with an example where an offshore wind farm failed miserably, but then you are going to have to compare that failed wind project to the cost of Fukushima and Chernobyl. OK. So it's not the people or the money. Now it's reliability? I have, by far, the most reliable power of anyone else here, because I have both solar generation and a backup battery system. Every home, company, military base, school, hospital etc in the US could do the same thing and guarantee themselves very reliable power. Much lower risk of a crane taking out a power line, a wildfire causing transmission line shutdowns or a truck running in to a transformer. If it's not people and it's not money, and reliability is everything, then that's the way to go. The two largest uranium suppliers in the world are Kazakhstan and Namibia. No, they're not friendly to us.

Perhaps more evil, given that they have more power.

You do realise that takeovers by existing military leaders are the most common type of coup, right? Since, according to you, that is almost exactly what does not constitute a coup, what is it? What happened in Myanmar last year if it wasn’t a coup? If it wasn’t a coup, was it legal? See, this is what happens when your only goal is to force logic to fit whatever narrative the radical right wing media is currently feeding you. You just start arguing against reality and demonstrating (yet again) that you don’t have a clue what the concepts you’re spouting off about actually mean. You don’t know what cancel culture is, you don’t know what Woke is, and now you don’t even know what a coup is.

But you just said that it's about people, and that everyone will only start to care about the problem when everyone is up to their necks in water. But let's say it's really all about money. We are the richest country in the world. If we just took the money that we spend on entertainment every year, and don't change a single other thing, that gives us $360 billion a year - a trillion dollars every three years. That's enough for a lot of solar farms, nuclear power plants, battery energy storage systems, pumped hydro, brine mining, charging networks etc. Don't want to give up entertainment? Then just take direct action. Refuse to buy gasoline. We will immediately cut emissions by at least 35%. Or never go anywhere without two people in the car. That reduces it by 16% - and costs nothing other than convenience. AND it ends traffic problems, parking issues and inner city pollution issues. Or just take the train. (And of course build more trains,) It is the height of stupidity to wait until the cost of preparation rises to the point where we can only afford to do that - and then do nothing BUT that. To go back to the boat analogy, it's absurd to wait until the only option is lifeboats in the middle of the North Atlantic, and only then consider doing something because then your life is in danger. Because by then a lot of other people will already have died, even if First Class isn't underwater yet.

Sorry, kids can't make those kind of decisions. If an infant presents with both secondary sexual characteristics (Stage 4 Prader for example) the parent has to make a decision right then and there, because you have to give them a functioning urethra one way or another - and potentially repair an opening between vagina and bladder. Letting them be incontinent and dooming them to a childhood full of UTI's would not be a good decision. You, as the parent, have to act for them and make a decision that is in their best interest - whatever you interpret that to be. And it isn't just secondary sexual characteristics, either. If the infant has partial anencephaly, the parents have to decide to attempt a repair or terminate care. In SMA type 1, the parents have to decide when to terminate care - because there are no good long term outcomes.

We all have personality conflicts with someone else in the Vortex. I’ve never known Fly to be a bully. I’d actually say he’s the exact opposite. He calls everyone out. He’s a peaceful guy who has a lot of case knowledge. So does Georger and so does Blevins. It’s a loss for Fly to not be on the boards. That’s my opinion. This isn’t taking sides. Chaucer you’ve had some good posts and seem to adapt well. If we get too heated with eachother then it ruins the fun. Maybe you guys should just not respond to eachother. Don’t take this as I don’t feel like knocking some people out sometimes. :)