No, but in the case of (for example) judges, yes, Obama appointed more — but if you’ll recall there was a lot of blocking — no matter who, as long as Obama wanted to appoint them, they were blocked. And since it’s possible to find something negative to say about every person in the world (for instance: they lied under oath in their confirmation hearing), anyone looking for a reason to think that was OK found one. Just look at the discussion here over the shameful Merrick Garland affair, and then the complete turnabout when it was time to appoint Barrett.
Truly, in these days of weaponizing politics and the rules, the ends seem to justify whatever means. I think that goes directly against the rule of law — there is intent, and not just wording, in laws.
Wendy P.