Leaderboard


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 03/07/2022 in Posts

  1. 5 points
    My friend wanted to jump the container with Aya in. I thought it wouldn't be fair if he got hurt so I just sent it myself. Not a bad beginner's object too. First base jump, home made rig. Anybody else done this? I didn't make the soft links or pc however.
  2. 4 points
    Fully agree that we need to start manufacturing in North America again. I think the hardest part will be convincing people that a rise in costs will be worth it. This means growing the middle class, which has been steadily disappearing.
  3. 1 point
    If what is the case? That there is an actual keystone pipeline? That isn't really up for debate, at least not among sane people. What happens when you find out Keystone XL wasn't even going to end in Texas?
  4. 1 point
    I built my container for my first base jump. Did not build the canopy. You've got me beat. I remember later when I traveled to norway. I and one of the friends traveling with me were jumping ribs I built. The guy that was checking us in and giving us intro at kjherag kept asking me what type of rigs we were jumping. I kept saying that they were my rig. Finely he caught on. I built them they're My Rig. They didn't have a name so I just decided to name them My Rig. Lee
  5. 1 point
    I find that most conservatives don't know that there is already a Keystone pipeline up and running, and the XL was just a second pipeline that would increase capacity in case the first one became 100% utilized (which it has not yet.)
  6. 1 point
    I did a 'double-take' when I read that and had to look it up. As suspected, there's a misplaced comma in there, possibly lost in translation; "Spanish Defense Minister said that it will send 1,370 anti-tank grenade launchers, 700,000 rifles and machine-gun rounds in the first shipment" That's 700000 ammo for rifles and MGs, not 700k rifles. Still useful though. Thank you, Spain.
  7. 1 point
    This literally never happened. I genuinely think you have confused Britain with Russia.
  8. 1 point
    Actually, it was his idea from March 3rd that you posted on March 4th. You also fail to mention that there were six points AND he said then that it needed to be done in the next 24 hours. https://cepa.org/six-ways-to-help-ukraine-survive-right-now/
  9. 1 point
    Sam Denby has done many videos on the airline industry, and logistics of other businesses. Yesterday he put out this one on the logistics of the Russian Army in the Ukraine invasion .
  10. 1 point
    To avoid talking at cross purposes - a no fly zone means direct conflict between NATO and Russian forces. It means shooting at Russian planes and killing Russian aircrew. Bigun’s point, which I fully agree with, is that you can’t talk about a no fly zone as if it’s an alternative to entering into combat. A no fly zone is combat, so you simply have to think in terms of whether you want NATO to be in direct combat against Russia or not.
  11. 1 point
    What the hell kind of turnaround shit is that? I've been trying to communicate to you and Joe that - we cannot worry about Putin. According to my plan we would have been there by now. You guys are the ones trying to avoid the situation with sanctions and batteries of Air Defense on other borders and humanitarian aid and maybe this and maybe that, and, and . . . Ya know, for someone who went to Ranger school you seem to have forgot about "Follow Me."
  12. 1 point
    Hi Ken, I agree with your first two sentences; not so much the 3rd. The vast majority of treaties that existed in 1938-39 were worthless. Jerry Baumchen
  13. 1 point
    Airplanes in the sky is the same as boots on the ground and would actively bring NATO into the conflict. Can you explain to me how you see a European response as separate from a NATO response?
  • Newsletter

    Want to keep up to date with all our latest news and information?
    Sign Up