Oh please.
There's a difference between ignorance & deliberate misinterpretation of data.
Here's one example: https://www.factcheck.org/2021/11/scicheck-why-its-easy-to-misinterpret-numbers-of-deaths-among-the-vaccinated/
In the Gibraltar example, they have a highly vaxxed population.
Almost complete. But the vax isn't 100% effective, so there are still cases.
So, as Billvon has pointed out on a couple occasions, more of the cases will be among the vaxxed, just because of the numbers.
To paraphrase what I remember Bill writing, if 99% are vaxxed, but half the cases are from the vaxxed, it means the vax is highly effective.
It doesn't mean the idiots and deniers won't hop on the 'half the cases are vaxxed!!!! The vax DOESN'T WORK!!!' bandwagon.
You have to dig a bit deeper, comparing rates among vaxxed & unvaxxed to get real, usable data.
As a couple examples, Minnesota has found that the death rates for vaxxed under 65 is 0.0/100k. Zero. That doesn't mean there aren't any deaths, it means the number rounds down to zero at the first past the decimal.
That would mean less than 0.05/100k, or something like less than 1 in 2 million.
Washington state is no longer reporting the death rates for vaxxed under 65 because it's essentially zero.