Leaderboard


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 01/10/2021 in all areas

  1. 2 points
  2. 2 points
    I dunno...my cousin once prayed so hard she pooped herself. There are real dangers to spiritual warfare!
  3. 2 points
    Cunning plan by the FBI. So cunning, you could pin a tail on it, and call it a weasel.
  4. 2 points
    My opinion is that Chao and Devos resigned so that they would not have to vote on the 25th.
  5. 1 point
    Of course they are. They are always against everything until it's shown, or discovered in a bathroom stall, that they're one, too.
  6. 1 point
    That's the spirit! I have zero sympathy for any of those idiots. Long jail sentences for all that survived, I say.
  7. 1 point
    BRILLIANT! But whoever wrote that speech missed a good punch line. It should have ended "for those who doubt the American people and spirit I tell you this" "We'll be back".
  8. 1 point
    Thanks for reminding us one more time of your belief. We did not quite understand correctly the first six times you told us.
  9. 1 point
  10. 1 point
    I see you are having trouble with the concept of free speech. Let's see if you understand this example. Consider Twitter to be a good upstanding Christian bakery and Trump's tweets to be a gay wedding cake. Does that make more sense to you?
  11. 1 point
  12. 1 point
    100% They forcibly entered one of the most sensitive areas of our National government. They could have been armed, some were, they could have had explosives, I believe some were also discovered in the area. This was an attack on the seat of our government, it should have been responded to no differently that if it was a group of jihadists, or foreign combatants. They should have been met with automatic weapons fire, and the firing should have continued until there ceased to be a threat, either because they were all on the ground or because they retreated from the building.
  13. 1 point
    But an impeachment would mean Trump can't run again, thereby removing the albatross from around their neck, so they can run someone in 2024 who is sane. It is in their longterm interest to help convict him in the senate.
  14. 1 point
    Hi heels, I'm with you. The R's do not want to take any responsibility as regards Trump. IMO they feel that an impeachment ( if it happens ) would be for the next Congress with the D's in charge; ergo, no responsibility. Jerry Baumchen
  15. 1 point
  16. 1 point
    After normiss calls out brent for being a waste of time, and say's he's out of the discussion: and now: Irony score through the roof. And absolutely typical of bullies of any stripe. Perfectly happy to dish it out but run away when the same tactics are used on them. This is one reason I want to see all these right wing assholes that have talked a big, tough game the last 4 years chased back into the darkest corners of the internet. To show that the 'libtards' aren't afraid of them, and that without Trump being in power there's no-one to enable their unacceptable bullshit any more.
  17. 1 point
  18. 1 point
    it's not called cancel culture, that is nothing more than another dog whistle. thanx for using it, now i know what you really are and it is not a troll for sure. i found out how racist i was about 15 or 20 years ago when it was pointed out to me in an embarrassing way. i had a couple of years of introspection and figured out ways to change. i can no longer be silent when racists spew hate, or when they interject snide comments, or use dog whistles. staying silent is tacit approval, and that leads to a new societal norm. we are still trying to get over all of the covert racism which was inserted into the great compromise, aka the constitution, which so many of you worship. it took me over two years to accept that my dad, whom i admired greatly and died when i was 17, was one of these passive racists. that hurts, more so since i can't just ask him how a man as smart as he was was fooled, or was he really a racist. i'm not gonna bother to ask you, but i will be damned if i sit here silently and not call you out on your racist view, words, and tactics. if it walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck...i wrote an opinion piece that i plan on submitting to an online magazine to see if they like it and it explains all of this more thoroughly than this and am attaching it to this post for anyone who wants to read it. just fyi brent, i think, no evidence other than what you provided, that you are passive according to the article. you should give it a look. i have seen another comment above saying that staying silent is what got us into this mess, and that is correct. 1st amendment does not apply to private life, just government. passive racists need to be called out loudly every time they show themselves. no excuse for tolerating hate speech, hate thoughts, or active or passive racism. ever. if this qualifies as a personal attack, ban me for as long as is needed, weather is decent this weekend anyway, hope i can catch a half a plane ride in a stearman. just don't make it permanent please, i like this website and will have another article to send in when i can gather my thoughts properly. 7 January.pdf
  19. 1 point
    I’ll take ‘Absolutely Everyone’ for 100, please Bob.
  20. 1 point
  21. 1 point
    Ditto...not to mention the Boyds's are damn nice people. One day when I get older I hope to grow up to be like Steve Boyd..."A STUD".
  • Newsletter

    Want to keep up to date with all our latest news and information?
    Sign Up