Leaderboard
-
in all areas
- All areas
- Adverts
- Advert Questions
- Advert Reviews
- Videos
- Video Comments
- Blog Entries
- Blog Comments
- Images
- Image Comments
- Image Reviews
- Albums
- Album Comments
- Album Reviews
- Files
- File Comments
- File Reviews
- Dropzones
- Dropzone Comments
- Dropzone Reviews
- Gear
- Gear Comments
- Gear Reviews
- Articles
- Article Comments
- Article Reviews
- Fatalities
- Fatality Comments
- Fatality Reviews
- Stolen items
- Stolen item Comments
- Stolen item Reviews
- Records
- Record Comments
- Record Reviews
- Help Files
- Help File Comments
- Help File Reviews
- Events
- Event Comments
- Event Reviews
- Posts
- Status Updates
- Status Replies
-
Custom Date
-
All time
January 20 2016 - August 12 2025
-
Year
August 12 2024 - August 12 2025
-
Month
July 12 2025 - August 12 2025
-
Week
August 5 2025 - August 12 2025
-
Today
August 12 2025
-
Custom Date
10/13/2020 - 10/13/2020
-
All time
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 10/13/2020 in all areas
-
6 pointsI'll say it again. All this nonsense is an indictment of the American education system. Seriously -- where are the (even most basic) critical thinking skills? Occam's razor, anyone?
-
2 pointsThe legitimacy of the court is being destroyed by the Republicans, who are using deceitfulness, hypocrisy, and naked power grabbing to install a Supreme Court that is far more conservative than the American public. I have read some analysis that suggests this court, with Judge Barrett on board, will be more conservative (as in, more hostile to civil rights and more friendly to business interests) than any court since the 1930s when the court was busy invalidating every New Deal program that came before it. Any court that seeks to turn the clock back almost a century will be seen as an enemy of the people by most of the population. If adding to the court is the only way to restore some balance, that would be (in my opinion) less damaging than the current direction. The question the Republicans are demanding that Biden answer is similar to the old "when did you stop beating your wife" canard. It is designed to have no correct answer, and to take attention away from the way Republicans are stacking the court with extremist Federalist Society alumni. Republicans have literally no platform (at least, that they are willing to disclose to the public) other than King Trump, so they have abdicated any right to demand any answers on policy matters from the Democrats.
-
1 pointWhen first learning to skydive, at least in the US, you attend a first jump course (FJC) that usually lasts between four and five hours on the ground, then you go up in a plane and jump. There are several methods of instruction including Accelerated Free Fall (AFF), Instructor Assisted Deployment (IAD), Static Line (SL), or a combination of the three called the Integrated Student Program (ISP). While all of these methods of instructions are different, they all have one thing in common: gravity. You have to land your parachute. This is where the PLF comes into play. It is also where numerous accidents happen, sometimes due to sliding in, rather than doing a PLF. This is understandable, since tandem pairs land this way for safety reasons. Besides standing up the landings (the preferred method), this is the landings students see most often. When skydiving first began, all of the equipment was military surplus. This included round canopies, so naturally the PLF was brought along as the safest way to land. Over time, and thanks to the innovation of early pioneers of the sport, the equipment evolved into the square (and now elliptical) canopy, which brought its own problems, like needing a slider to control the opening, and also alleviated the issue with hard landings, mostly. Now, rather than falling more or less wherever the wind blew you, you could steer and fly the canopy much the same as a glider, since the canopy is now a pressurized wing. When you want to land, you fly a landing pattern and pull both steering toggles down and flare, much the same as an airplane would by using flaps. This allows you to bleed off forward speed and land softly standing up (theoretically). Like all things skydiving, when it works, it works really well, but when it doesn't work, it can kill you. I was a skydiver before going airborne, so when it came time to learn how to PLF, I thought I had an advantage since I had been taught how. Boy was I wrong. They had a platform you climbed on and rode a zip line to gain forward speed and then you let go to learn how to PLF in a simulated landing. I could not keep my feet together, so the Blackhat (instructor) tied my boots together. I had to hop around all day, but I have not had a problem keeping my feet together since. In airborne school, they take two weeks to train you how to jump out of planes compared to five hours in skydiving. Most of that time is preparing you to land. As there is no way to steer the round canopy other than slipping on landing (pulling the risers to go sideways a little) or facing into the wind, and no way to flare or slow down the speed, the PLF is needed to prevent injury. I have seen a jumper fall about 50 feet and do a PLF and walk away with a few bruises. While I understand that time is limited and it is hard to prepare a student for all possibilities, I feel that more time should be spent on PLFs during the FJC, at least an hour, and that students should do at least five correct PLFs before every jump. This is standard procedure before doing an airborne jump, and includes all jumpers being led through the entire jump by a jumpmaster, including their emergency procedures. If we put every student through this before every day of jumping, it would help prevent injuries. The reason students choose to slide in rather than PLF is observation. Since this is the way a tandem pair lands in order to prevent injury, it is assumed to be safe. It is, when properly taught. It is easier to injure yourself sliding in or trying to run out a landing than doing a PLF. I know of at least two serious injuries sustained sliding in that a proper PLF would have prevented. One case ended with a cage around the lower vertebrae. I made a jump at an unfamiliar DZ on rental gear and the winds were a little high, about 15 mph, so I ended up landing long. When I turned on final, there were some power lines in front of me and I was headed straight for them. I turned around and did a downwind landing, and a PLF into the hard-as-a-rock, newly plowed field, ending up with some scratches when I landed. I was going about 20 mph forward speed. Had I slid in or tried to run it out, I would most likely have broken something. Another time I jumped at an unfamiliar DZ, I chose to PLF instead of running it out, and while walking back stepped in a gopher hole. Had I hit that while running out the landing, I would have broken my ankle. A proper PLF has five points of contact: the balls of the feet, calf, thigh, buttock, and pull-up muscle (deltoid). When you prepare to hit the ground, keep your feet and knees together, slightly bent, in preparation to absorb the impact. When you fall, hit all the points of contact in order, while rolling on the ground. A proper PLF will allow you to absorb all of the energy and dissipate it by rolling, rather than staying stiff and breaking bones or tearing ligaments and tendons. I kick my feet together when approaching my landing to ensure my feet are together and knees bent, ready to hit the ground and roll. That way, if I don't bleed off enough speed to land standing up, I am already prepared to roll and do it without thinking. If I am going slowly enough, I have a nice stand up landing. Although the goal is standing it up, it is best to be prepared for a PLF, especially if you are fond of your ankles and spine. Blue skies. Article written by @sfzombie13
-
1 point" From the highly discredited series...simply entitled: “Not for instructional purposes” Burned out It's been a long, hot day. I could really use a cold beer." https://drive.google.com/file/d/13QFOtbQxzqRmYEGzk2Evecn6wIJFctUy/view?usp=sharing https://drive.google.com/file/d/10Yv6wKFU8S7EPbdonY39Dceu61XH95D_/view?usp=sharing https://drive.google.com/file/d/17Twe2YDaBvB_29Xtut8a3rN9eSEBnvCl/view?usp=sharing https://drive.google.com/file/d/1n7qPu3wE-jNd95AKPe22EeTK6bEg7IOH/view?usp=sharing https://drive.google.com/file/d/1k0htWvAuu-LUgeh_QhrCXG0DgA6HF65E/view?usp=sharing https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rJO254yauor1LhGhIKnbEHgm31Xs6FT-/view?usp=sharing https://drive.google.com/file/d/1TyrLTl6WOmyJDSF3U0fOLXbYGnAjjtZA/view?usp=sharing
-
1 pointThat's not what he's said at all. Scenario A: Either a full travel ban from hotspots or mandatory quarantine for all incoming travelers. Everyone gets locked down regardless of citizenship. Scenario B: No travel restrictions, no quarantine. Scenario C: Let citizens return from hotspots freely, with no quarantining or tracing. Non-citizens blocked from travel, but this only reduces incoming numbers by say, 30%. Trump said he called for Scenario A. This was bullshit. What actually happened was C. B & C are functionally identical for the purposes of controlling spread. YES there are slight differences in the end case figures, no one is disputing that. What they are saying is that A was the method that would actually be a control. It never happened.
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 pointJust another reason to move all this shit online. The entire world economy--every stock in existence in every country in existence, and the sum of all money in every account at every bank in every legitimate currency--can be accessed online, even via my phone while taking a shit. We are able to do that all the time, but we cant vote online? I'd say trillions of dollars in stock and cash in digital form is worth more than any election is, so safe to say that we have already done 'bigger, better things' online so safe to say the medium has been tested and demonstrated as acceptable.
-
1 pointPerhaps a blockchain document verification system might be a similar solution: https://medium.com/blockchainexpert-blog/document-verification-using-blockchain-a02c059ed97b
-
1 pointSsshhh!!! Someone tell him he needs to hold some rallies there!!! [evil grin]
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 pointGeorge Floyd once served 10 months in prison on a charge of supplying $10 of drugs, on the word of a cop with a history of fabricating evidence. This fat old white guy effectively steals a quarter of a billion in public money and pleads down to a misdemeanour with no jail time. Freedom really isn't free, you only get it if you can afford it. Of course. Why wouldn't another rich career criminal be welcomed into the Trump orbit with open arms, so he can make more money selling access to Trump to other career criminals from around the world. Yet more evidence of the sheer insanity of anyone who rails against 'the elite' but supports Trump. No-one knows more about elitism than Trump, believe me...
-
1 point
-
1 pointAnother American who doesn't understand the US constitution. How did you all get this uneducated and clueless?
-
Newsletter