Well, no. I studied computer science, was a software engineer and founded and ran a software company for a decade. I got into computer science when it was still necessary to know much about hardware and machine language, so this is a favorite topic for me:
In a computer there is really nothing else but a large number of gates (which are physical objects that hold a physical state). These gates are connected in a way that certain results can be produced when the gates change their states. "Information" is simply an abstract concept that in essence describes the physical states of these gates.
Modern software (object-oriented programming, procedural programming, etc.) is just multiple layers of abstraction on to of that, but I can tell you that, in the computer, nothing really exists, but physical signals that are stored and interact with each other.
There is no "concept", no "mind", no "awareness" in the computer. It is, in my opinion, completely reasonable to assume that no matter the complexity of the computer (even if it exceeds the complexity of the human brain) there will never be anything of the type of "consciousness" to it, because it simply isn't necessary for the computer to work perfectly. "Consciousness"--the fact that someone is "in there" being aware of itself--is something that has nothing to do with the action of the computer.
"Software" is an interpretation and abstraction of our minds that we superimpose on the computer to make it easier to work with. It requires our mind to work. So it requires something else, outside the computer. Same with the brain: "concepts" do NOT exist within the brain. They exist in the mind or in something that is not of the same nature as the brain. While you can draw relationships between brain activity and certain internal experiences, you cannot find "concepts" in the brain, nor can you find "software" (the meaning of the software) in the hardware of the computer.