It seems to me that the entire "who is left, who is right, who is middle" is a quite useless discussion based on an artificial scale that doesn't have any subtlety or even reality at all, other than being somewhat pre-determined by our 2-party system.
First, who defines where the middle is? That is entirely subjective (unless one defines it as a statistical bell-curve that only depends on the attitudes of people in the nation, but then would a somewhat less extreme Nazi in Germany in the 1930s have been a centrist??? Or Lenin in 1924 in Russia?)
More importantly, it flattens the entire political spectrum to a one-dimensional scale, and it isn't surprising that, if one accepts this scale, one sometimes finds oneself defending absurd positions, simply because they (seem to!) align with the "side" one favors.
I like the idea of multiple scales forming a multidimensional space that allows for much more interesting definitions of where someone's political viewpoint falls. Here are a few:
1.authoritarian <-> liberal
(somewhat self-explanatory; "liberal" doesn't have the same meaning here as in the 1-dimensional scale, of course)
2. interiorist <-> exteriorist
(=looking for the problem/solution primarily in the interior (i.e. people are bad, need to have better morals) versus the exterior (society disadvantages people, gun laws need to be changed, etc))
3. stepping on the gas <-> stepping on the brakes
(we need to look forward and keep changing society & accept new ideas (lgbtq rights, new renewable energy technologies, etc) versus we need to preserve our traditional values (religion, traditional marriage, traditional morals, etc.)
4. individual <-> collective
(individual rights and freedoms should trump everything versus collective rights are more important (Spok: "The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few--or the one")
There are probably some more.
This way a "right wing libertarian" may be:
1. Towards the liberal end
2. Towards the interiorist end
3. middle but leaning towards stepping on the brakes
4. extreme individual
A different "right wing" person may be:
1. extreme authoritarian
2. interiorist
3. extreme stepping on the brakes
4. center (or even collectivist--placing his religious community and its rules ahead of his individual freedoms)
Now, of course: When we're at the ballot box, we'll still need to pick one of two sides, at least if we live and vote in the US (unless we want to make our vote somewhat irrelevant) BUT we don't have to allow this to define our entire political persona, do we?