Leaderboard
-
in all areas
- All areas
- Adverts
- Advert Questions
- Advert Reviews
- Videos
- Video Comments
- Blog Entries
- Blog Comments
- Images
- Image Comments
- Image Reviews
- Albums
- Album Comments
- Album Reviews
- Files
- File Comments
- File Reviews
- Dropzones
- Dropzone Comments
- Dropzone Reviews
- Gear
- Gear Comments
- Gear Reviews
- Articles
- Article Comments
- Article Reviews
- Fatalities
- Fatality Comments
- Fatality Reviews
- Stolen items
- Stolen item Comments
- Stolen item Reviews
- Records
- Record Comments
- Record Reviews
- Help Files
- Help File Comments
- Help File Reviews
- Events
- Event Comments
- Event Reviews
- Posts
- Status Updates
- Status Replies
-
Custom Date
-
All time
January 20 2016 - August 11 2025
-
Year
August 11 2024 - August 11 2025
-
Month
July 11 2025 - August 11 2025
-
Week
August 4 2025 - August 11 2025
-
Today
August 11 2025
-
Custom Date
10/09/2019 - 10/09/2019
-
All time
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 10/09/2019 in all areas
-
1 pointI have seen this industry grow in the past 20+ years from 1 skydiving simulator, to over 70 now. There are a lot of growing pains this industry has gone through. I have watched coaches try many different techniques, some that have worked, some that have not, while some were safe, and some were not. Teach only what you know is safe and productive. I would love to see us share information, growing to become safer and more productive! JW
-
1 pointSome won't. But I don't think a lot (enough to matter). The 'shades of Hillary' would have to include E-Mails, Benghazi, Pizza parlors with child sex rings in basements that don't exist (both the basement and the sex ring), murderous plots and all that. Hillary didn't lose because she was a woman. As noted above, she lost because she was on the receiving end of one of the most viscous and protracted character assassination efforts in modern history.
-
1 point
-
1 pointIsn't it incredible how quickly people forget. Clinton had a full platform. Trump's platform was: I am rich and I hate migrants on the southern border. Now people are saying that if only if the DNC has a clear platform they will win.....it would be funny if it wasn't so sad.
-
1 pointThat's simply not true though. It's not supported by any objective assessment of the last election. Clinton brought an exceptionally detailed manifesto to the table. She lost because was the victim of the most sustained and focussed character assassination any of us have ever seen, and came up against a candidate no-one expected with a message no-one (not even his own side) took seriously until too late. You put far too much stock into the assumption that the last thing that happened is guaranteed to happen again. Trump won the last election with madness, it doesn't mean madness will win every future election - just as Obama winning two elections with reason didn't mean reason prevailed last time. Even so, what if Trump did change the game and that's how you've got to play it? Well then, Trump's victory showed that constant attack is the best form of attack, and he won in the midst of a virtual civil war with almost every well known leader of his party.
-
1 point
-
1 pointI have no fear of a mass extintion.I hike thru nature nearly every day and reval in life. Your the ones running around with hair on fire.Doomsday theorists. You see how you've let your fear run wild, to the point you beleive in such outlandish pridictions. But since I can't deny,I'm in denial. You leave me in quite the Pickle, so I guess We're all fucked. Where do I sign that GND. Unless you know of the Huge meteor hurling thru space that about to hit us.You shouldn't put yourself thru such torturer. This is what your Ideology has produced,a generation that suffers from "Visceral Anxiety" and depression.The resugence of the Mutual Assured Destruction Psychology, Bravo.. "By promising one thing and doing another." What the hell did America promise her? Dont know where you got all those Qotes from... but The EPA was founded by Commonsense Conservative Dick Nixon and that Montreal agreement that banned CFC was signed by Ronnie.As for conservation well... Main article: Presidency of Theodore Roosevelt § Conservation Roosevelt driving through a sequoia tree tunnel Of all Roosevelt's achievements, he was proudest of his work in conservation of natural resources and extending federal protection to land and wildlife.[145]Roosevelt worked closely with Interior Secretary James Rudolph Garfield and Chief of the United States Forest Service Gifford Pinchot to enact a series of conservation programs that often met with resistance from Western members of Congress, such as Charles William Fulton.[146] Nonetheless, Roosevelt established the United States Forest Service, signed into law the creation of five National Parks, and signed the 1906 Antiquities Act, under which he proclaimed 18 new U.S. National Monuments. He also established the first 51 bird reserves, four game preserves, and 150 National Forests. The area of the United States that he placed under public protection totals approximately 230,000,000 acres (930,000 km2).[147] Roosevelt extensively used executive orders on a number of occasions to protect forest and wildlife lands during his tenure as President.[148] By the end of his second term in office, Roosevelt used executive orders to establish 150 million acres of reserved forestry land.[149] Roosevelt was unapologetic about his extensive use of executive orders to protect the environment, despite the perception in Congress that he was encroaching on too many lands.[149] Eventually, Senator Charles Fulton (R-OR) attached an amendment to an agricultural appropriations bill that effectively prevented the president from reserving any further land.[149] Before signing that bill into law, Roosevelt used executive orders to establish an additional 21 forest reserves, waiting until the last minute to sign the bill into law.[150] In total, Roosevelt used executive orders to establish 121 forest reserves in 31 states.[150] Prior to Roosevelt, only one president had issued over 200 executive orders, Grover Cleveland (253). The first 25 presidents issued a total of 1,262 executive orders; Roosevelt issued 1,081.[151]
-
1 point
-
1 pointRight, but (as could become the case here) the President could be indicted at State level, try the defence that he is immune, and see that defence rejected by the courts. The Justice department would then need to reconsider their position. Aside from that, I liked that the judge commented on Trump’s use of personal attorneys to argue Executive privileges. One of the most insidious parts of the whole shoddy affair is the normalisation of sending personal cronies to do State business. It’s bonkers that Trump thinks it supports him that Zelensky mentioned Giuliani first in that phone call. Giuliani is a personal employee of Trump the private citizen. He doesn’t work for the government. He is not White House staff. He has no accountability or responsibility to the US taxpayer, and no ethical oversight from any branch of government. His only responsibility is to advance the personal interests of DJT. So what the fuck is he doing out there?
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 pointLooks like not fast enough... Net-Zero Carbon Dioxide Emissions By 2050 Requires A New Nuclear Power Plant Every Day https://www.forbes.com/sites/rogerpielke/2019/09/30/net-zero-carbon-dioxide-emissions-by-2050-requires-a-new-nuclear-power-plant-every-day/#3ca45f9735f7 You all seem very quick to tear down the existing energy grid before you have a replacement. Go green if you will, but leave coal and oil until we can actually afford to lose them.
-
1 point
-
1 pointI'm on a 10 minute call and she just winked at me and went into the tent. The Load Organizer is chewing my ass about sumpin, but she just winked at me and went into the tent. I need to run into town to get some beer for my beer offense, but she just winked at me and went into the tent
-
1 pointThat's like saying you care more about your family than having an ozone layer (something you've probably never seen with your own eyes.) Sure, it's boring, but your family would have a much higher incidence of cancer without it - so a smart person would care about it.
-
Newsletter