Peej 0 #1 December 19, 2005 Hi there, I've been learning to fly camera for tandems for a few months now and in the New Year i'm planning on going all out. That means buying a stills camera to put on my pip. I know nothing about stills photography so i've decided i may as well spend the cash and go digital right away, meaning i can go out and mess around without incurring the cost of developing. I've done some searching and while there are plenty of threads on the subject i'd like to know what you guys are using right now and what you think of what you're using? And maybe a few recommendations? The two camera dudes at my DZ have both just ordered the Cannon 350D online and swear by it. I'm off to Austria in a week and will be stopping in Dohaa (sp?) in Quatar, apparently they have an amazing duty free section so was hoping to pick something up there. Any and all advice is much appreciated. Many thanks PJ Advertisio Rodriguez / Sky Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
piisfish 140 #2 December 19, 2005 350D... Ordering my 2nd one right now... scissors beat paper, paper beat rock, rock beat wingsuit - KarlM Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Peej 0 #3 December 19, 2005 Quote350D... Ordering my 2nd one right now... Sweet, thanks dude. Keep the replies coming people! Advertisio Rodriguez / Sky Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
piisfish 140 #4 December 19, 2005 5500ZAR//850USD here in Switz... that's for 350D body and 18/55mm lens, plus a 256Mb UltraII CFcardscissors beat paper, paper beat rock, rock beat wingsuit - KarlM Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
plutoniumsalmon 0 #5 December 19, 2005 Cannon 5D, I bought one for my dad and it rocks. Its a little more hefty but it will kick ass in quality and performance. Though for you it might be a bit too sophisticated and pricy if all you want to do with it is put it on your helmet. But if you want to learn how to photograph you will not outgrow it for a long while. Personally I am a leica personPointy birds Oh pointy pointy Anoint my head Anointy nointy Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
piisfish 140 #6 December 19, 2005 5D is excellent, but for a common use for skydiving, moreover by a "beginner" in photography, it's a bit too much... 350D/RebelXT is very light, tight and performant enough. And I didn't outgrow mine in the 6 months I had it...scissors beat paper, paper beat rock, rock beat wingsuit - KarlM Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Peej 0 #7 December 19, 2005 Quote5500ZAR//850USD here in Switz... that's for 350D body and 18/55mm lens, plus a 256Mb UltraII CFcard Sweet, that's the same price that Chris and Piers have found online so far, i decided i'd hold off ordering until i can see what's in duty free in Quatar. That's also provided i can find someone to bring it back for me, otherwise i'm gonna get nailed with import duties Advertisio Rodriguez / Sky Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gus 1 #8 December 19, 2005 I haven't jumped it yet but I just got my new 350D and I'm well impressed with how responsive it is. To my uneducated self it feels just like a film camera. GusOutpatientsOnline.com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Peej 0 #9 December 19, 2005 Thanks Gus Advertisio Rodriguez / Sky Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AndyMan 7 #10 December 20, 2005 A suggestion, spend some time in the sport before you start giving out advice.The 5D is not a great camera for skydiving because of its relatively slow frame rate. As much as we all like to think we're Ansel Adams, there are some situations specific to skydiving - like exits, where a fast frame rate is pretty much required. _Am__ You put the fun in "funnel" - craichead. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sdsouthsask 0 #11 December 20, 2005 QuoteThe 5D is not a great camera for skydiving because of its relatively slow frame rate. You require more than "3 frames-per-second for up to 60 JPEG" at 12.8 Megapixel? Seems more than sufficient for what I am doing. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ltdiver 3 #12 December 20, 2005 Quotestopping in Dohaa (sp?) in Quatar, apparently they have an amazing duty free section so was hoping to pick something up there. For others...something that might need considering....if the camera needs any warranty work it probably won't be available here in the states if you pick it up in a foreign country. ltdiver Don't tell me the sky's the limit when there are footprints on the moon Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
plutoniumsalmon 0 #13 December 20, 2005 The reason why I mentioned the5D, and it does have a sufficiently high frame rate, is because it will not be obsolete anytime soon, and hence will provide mere bang for the proverbial buck for a longer time. It seems to me that lower end digital cameras keep on getting updated every year to something faster, better and cheaper, thus leaving the older ones in the dust. This will of course happen eventually with the 5D but it will take longer. Also the 5D being a rather cheap full frame camera has the advantage of not needing as wide a lens as its non full frame alternative. Having a higher resolution also means that it can be blown up so much more, this can become useful if one decides to provide a poster rather than a small photo to the tandem customer. It could make more money. But then again I could be wrong, after all I dont have much time in the sport, but then again I am a professional photo/film person and that apparently does not count Pointy birds Oh pointy pointy Anoint my head Anointy nointy Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PhreeZone 20 #14 December 20, 2005 The 5D is too heavy for casual usage. The 10D/20D are at the limits of most peoples weight limts, expecially one they start tacking on flashes and all the needed video gear. The 5D is great for the Norman Kents and McGowains of the world that have a helmet dedicated to just stills, but for the average Joe Videographer out there the price difference of $2500 is better spent on second rig/flashes/better glass... 99%of the tandem jumpers out there are happy with 35 mm film or digitals shot on a Rebel frame and cheap glass. You have to weigh if that 1% that wants everything more/bigger/faster/whatever is worth the money to have equipment to make them happy. I'm not seeing almost anyone that posts to this board as having clients that a 10D/20D would not fulfill their requirements.Yesterday is history And tomorrow is a mystery Parachutemanuals.com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
plutoniumsalmon 0 #15 December 20, 2005 Hey it was just a thoughtPointy birds Oh pointy pointy Anoint my head Anointy nointy Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
goobersnuftda 0 #16 December 20, 2005 Compare the cameras side by side: http://tinyurl.com/87vpz A good unbias review from CNET on the 5D: http://tinyurl.com/b9yog Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
plutoniumsalmon 0 #17 December 20, 2005 Thank you.Pointy birds Oh pointy pointy Anoint my head Anointy nointy Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AndyMan 7 #18 December 20, 2005 Quote Hey it was just a thoughtSmile as I said before I shoot a leica but I will eventually bellymount (once I am proficcient enough) a hasselblad. I've been threatening to jump my Speed Graphics. I want to helmet mount it, but my wife thinks I'm nuts, she says I should belly mount it. Between me and my wife, we've got more photography hardware lieing around the house than I care to count - including the Speed Graphics, a Leica, 3 canons and 2 Nikons. The one that I choose to jump is one of the cheapest DSLRs on the market. What makes a great camera on the ground is often a whole lot different then what makes a good one in the air. As for the Hassleblad, I know one former jumper who took one on most of his jumps. He helmet mounted it, and it worked well - but I don't think he got as much from the camera in the air as he did on the ground. _Am__ You put the fun in "funnel" - craichead. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
plutoniumsalmon 0 #19 December 20, 2005 loading it in free flight should be fun. The skydiving weegePointy birds Oh pointy pointy Anoint my head Anointy nointy Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ScottyInAus 0 #20 December 27, 2005 What lense would you throw on the 350D for; a) Tandems b) Rel Work c) Landings Cheers, Jason. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ltdiver 3 #21 December 27, 2005 Tandems: 15-20mm (depends on how close you'd like to get) RW: 20mm Landings: Again, depends on how close you want to be, but I love my 70-300mm lens for that. ltdiver Don't tell me the sky's the limit when there are footprints on the moon Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ScottyInAus 0 #22 December 27, 2005 Exactly what I was chasing, cheers heaps mate. Cheers, Jason. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
piisfish 140 #23 December 27, 2005 Received it this morning.. now I need to find a Manfrotto plate before going donw to Empuria...scissors beat paper, paper beat rock, rock beat wingsuit - KarlM Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites