0
sdctlc

Scanning Negatives

Recommended Posts

OK, any advice or sugggestins on this? What scanner works best tricks on it ect. I have a bunch of negatives and I would like to just scan the ones I like and not have to take them to the shop to get them to due what looks to be something that I can do at home.

I can pick up a HP scanner with the negative holder but before I go buy one I was curious if anybody is doing that and if so what the results are like....

Thanks,
Scott C.
"He who Hesitates Shall Inherit the Earth!"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I was thinking of a flatbed scanner that has the film negative adaptor. You can pick them up for from 40 to 100 depending on the unit. I was looking at the following but really was curious if somebody had used one to do this....

Example
"He who Hesitates Shall Inherit the Earth!"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

A transparency adapter with a flatbed scanner is your best bet for scanning negatives. The specific negative scanners are a waste of money at best.



How do you figure? You're sacrificing quality for convenience - poorer lighting, focus, and no ICE options. The results may be acceptable for some use, but if he wants these images for the longer haul, why not do it right?

Wouldn't buy one, though. I've barely used my Nikon in the past couple years as I went digital 4 years back. Now I only occasionally come across film.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I picked up the Nikon Cool Scan IV which had the Ice software. It had been mentioned on hear a "while" back.

While it is just for negatives and slides, it was far from a waste of money. My wife scanned over 1500 slides for one project alone, and I continually scan my old negatives with no problems.

Also the Ice software saved many hours of touch up work. Not sure if that sort of thing is old technology or not now though.

Probably depends on what sort of scanning volume you have.

Fuzzy
Ambition / Ability: Know the difference.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have both a flatbed w/adapter and film/slide scanner - the flatbed is crap compared to the film scanner. I just finished scanning a roll of Velvia, looks great out of the film scanner and something like 13 megapixel. Personally, I think if I shoot raw with my DSLR its pretty close but using JPG quality - the film scanner is much better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Also the Ice software saved many hours of touch up work. Not sure if that sort of thing is old technology or not now though.



Is actually hardware - scans with infrared red. It's become more readily available on cheaper models now. Definitely useful with more abused/old sources.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks - deep down I think, or should have known that but for some reason thought it was a built in software thing too :$

Just for fun I've scanned the same negative with and without using the Ice feature - Big Difference as far as the spots and other imperfections on the negs & slides go.

Someone tried to explain how it works, and that if I wanted a really sharp scan, not to use Ice but to do the work in Photoshop. I couldn't see any difference in sharpness of the scan, only in the scratches & spots etc, but I'm not a professional & only enlarged the prints to 11 x 8-1/2 so..... Do you know if that's really the case? (in regards to the scanner part not the professional part)

Regardless, some of my neg's are not in the "greatest" shape so it's saved/saving endless work.

Fuzzy
Ambition / Ability: Know the difference.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It would make sense since ICE needs to do some sort of differential between the infrared scan and the color. The SW I use - Vuescan - allows for 3 levels of correction. At higher levels there has to be a price. If it was a single scratch, I think I'd go the other way and just fix it later.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0