CanuckInUSA 0 #1 July 14, 2003 Which do you feel is more dangerous? Swooping or base jumping? Try not to worry about the things you have no control over Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hooknswoop 19 #2 July 14, 2003 Having done both, I think BASE jumping is more dangerous by far. Hook Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
andy2 0 #3 July 14, 2003 I think it depends entirely upon the person. But I've only "swooped" a 260 sq ft canopy and am still waiting to jump my first A. --------------------------------------------- let my inspiration flow, in token rhyme suggesting rhythm... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkySlut 0 #4 July 14, 2003 I think they are equally dangerous in the wrong hands...there is very little margin for error in both disciplines. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites quade 4 #5 July 14, 2003 Quotethere is very little margin for error in both disciplines. The difference being that when an accident happens at a DZ, there is infrastructure in place to deal with it and at a remote site, well, it might not get there quite as quickly. Also, at a DZ, the implication is that the swoop area, pond, grass or whatever, is reasonably clear of debris. Landing areas at BASE sites might not always be so nice. Then again, WTFDIK? I don't do either because both are over my comfort level and do not pass my personal risk/reward calculations (although there are a few BASE sites I'd consider).quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites SkySlut 0 #6 July 14, 2003 Good point...you are going to need a helicopter to haul your ass out if you biff in on some of the remote exit points for BASE. Medical attention or lack thereof, can make the difference between life and death. Another consideration...its not often that you get arrested for swooping. Although, it has been known to happen. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites hookitt 1 #7 July 14, 2003 Notice the landing area, Does this help answer the question?My grammar sometimes resembles that of magnetic refrigerator poetry... Ghetto Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites CanuckInUSA 0 #8 July 14, 2003 Having zero BASE jumps under my belt, I'm obviously not very qualified to talk about this sport. But BASE seems to have many more unknown variables to each jump that swooping doesn't have. So in that respect I do believe that BASE may be more dangerous. But the margin for error in both disciplines is small, and they are obviously both dangerous (but fun). Try not to worry about the things you have no control over Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Steel 0 #9 July 14, 2003 First I will say that I have not base jumped and that unless somebody pays me a significant sum of money to do so (In a stunt scene or something) I would not do it. I won't do it because IMHO its foolish when I consider the risks involved. For me that second or 2 of ground rush followed by and extremely slow canopy descent seems as if its just not worth the risk. On the other hand the risk involved in flying my canopy of choice (a nicely loaded one) is one that I am well aware of but feel like I am gaining enough pleasure from it to take my chances on it. That is my opinion I do not require anybody to agree with it but I do require them to respect it. Just as I respect base jumpers' right to choose to base jump even though deep down I think its a very stupid choice they have made.If I could make a wish, I think I'd pass. Can't think of anything I need No cigarettes, no sleep, no light, no sound. Nothing to eat, no books to read. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Ron 10 #10 July 15, 2003 Having done both... They both can be as safe, or as risky as you let them. Take a guy with no experience or education with a high WL...Well, I think everyone knows where I stand on that. A guy that takes the same approach that a lot of swoopers do when it comes to BASE will end up just as dead. If they think they know what they are doing, and don't listen to the guys with more BASE jumps than them...Well I fiqure they are a crater waiting to happen. FWIW I only have 2 BASE jumps...I didn't like them. A lot of work climbing a tower for a few second freefall. I might do it again, but its not something I could really get into."No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Tonto 1 #11 July 15, 2003 Swooping is judgement dependant Base is both judgement and equipment dependant. tIt's the year of the Pig. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites sneaky 0 #12 July 15, 2003 I have done both and Skydiving has hurt me,I got knocked unconcious after exit and came round at 3000feet ,no Cypres and broken Nose and ...mmm the taste of blood in freefall...thats something eh? But I work in GSM Telecommunications and by far RF Radiation on some Towers and the access to them and the climb is more dangerous.Plus the margin for error on BASE....hhmm Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0
quade 4 #5 July 14, 2003 Quotethere is very little margin for error in both disciplines. The difference being that when an accident happens at a DZ, there is infrastructure in place to deal with it and at a remote site, well, it might not get there quite as quickly. Also, at a DZ, the implication is that the swoop area, pond, grass or whatever, is reasonably clear of debris. Landing areas at BASE sites might not always be so nice. Then again, WTFDIK? I don't do either because both are over my comfort level and do not pass my personal risk/reward calculations (although there are a few BASE sites I'd consider).quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkySlut 0 #6 July 14, 2003 Good point...you are going to need a helicopter to haul your ass out if you biff in on some of the remote exit points for BASE. Medical attention or lack thereof, can make the difference between life and death. Another consideration...its not often that you get arrested for swooping. Although, it has been known to happen. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hookitt 1 #7 July 14, 2003 Notice the landing area, Does this help answer the question?My grammar sometimes resembles that of magnetic refrigerator poetry... Ghetto Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CanuckInUSA 0 #8 July 14, 2003 Having zero BASE jumps under my belt, I'm obviously not very qualified to talk about this sport. But BASE seems to have many more unknown variables to each jump that swooping doesn't have. So in that respect I do believe that BASE may be more dangerous. But the margin for error in both disciplines is small, and they are obviously both dangerous (but fun). Try not to worry about the things you have no control over Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Steel 0 #9 July 14, 2003 First I will say that I have not base jumped and that unless somebody pays me a significant sum of money to do so (In a stunt scene or something) I would not do it. I won't do it because IMHO its foolish when I consider the risks involved. For me that second or 2 of ground rush followed by and extremely slow canopy descent seems as if its just not worth the risk. On the other hand the risk involved in flying my canopy of choice (a nicely loaded one) is one that I am well aware of but feel like I am gaining enough pleasure from it to take my chances on it. That is my opinion I do not require anybody to agree with it but I do require them to respect it. Just as I respect base jumpers' right to choose to base jump even though deep down I think its a very stupid choice they have made.If I could make a wish, I think I'd pass. Can't think of anything I need No cigarettes, no sleep, no light, no sound. Nothing to eat, no books to read. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron 10 #10 July 15, 2003 Having done both... They both can be as safe, or as risky as you let them. Take a guy with no experience or education with a high WL...Well, I think everyone knows where I stand on that. A guy that takes the same approach that a lot of swoopers do when it comes to BASE will end up just as dead. If they think they know what they are doing, and don't listen to the guys with more BASE jumps than them...Well I fiqure they are a crater waiting to happen. FWIW I only have 2 BASE jumps...I didn't like them. A lot of work climbing a tower for a few second freefall. I might do it again, but its not something I could really get into."No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tonto 1 #11 July 15, 2003 Swooping is judgement dependant Base is both judgement and equipment dependant. tIt's the year of the Pig. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sneaky 0 #12 July 15, 2003 I have done both and Skydiving has hurt me,I got knocked unconcious after exit and came round at 3000feet ,no Cypres and broken Nose and ...mmm the taste of blood in freefall...thats something eh? But I work in GSM Telecommunications and by far RF Radiation on some Towers and the access to them and the climb is more dangerous.Plus the margin for error on BASE....hhmm Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites