0
indyz

Sizing differences on PIA chart

Recommended Posts

Alright, I just bought a rig that will fit a Sabre 170 if I pack carefully. I've put a few jumps on a Sabre2 170 and a Sabre 170 and decided I liked the original Sabre better, plus I saw gobs of used ones for sale. Now somebody has put the idea of casual CReW in my head, so I was taking a look at Triathlons and Spectres.

I checked the handy PIA canopy volumes chart to see if the Spectre 170 would pack small enough. The chart lists Sabre 170 volumes as 451, 445, 397 cubic inches for an average of 431. It lists the Spectre 170 as 416, 455, 424 cubic inches for an average of 431.

So whats up with the variations? Canopy wear and manufacturing differences? And will the Spectre fit in my container (sorry, I don't have the exact sizing info yet)?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
A Spectre 170 will fit in any container that will hold a Sabre 170. Depending on the container... it could hold everything from a 170 to a 135. I tossed a Lighting 176 (packs larger then a Spectre 170) in the same rig that held a 120 Stiletto.

The pack volunme on the Spectre will probally be just a touch lower then a Sabre's. Toss out the high and low numbers on that chart and look at the middle number. See the Sabre is larger then the Specte. 7 Cells usualy pack smaller then 9 cells of the same size.
Yesterday is history
And tomorrow is a mystery

Parachutemanuals.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

So whats up with the variations?


Depends on where it was measured, who did the measuring, what the weather was like when it was measured, manufacture dates of the canopies measured... there are a lot of variables, some that can't be explained.

If you can put a Sabre 170 in that rig, a Spectre 170 should fit fine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>So whats up with the variations?

See this:
http://www.pia.com/piapubs/TS%20Documents/ts-104.htm

Poynter's manual has also a chapter concerning canopy volumes.

In short, measuring the volume of a bunch of fabric and lines isn't really an exact science. The method is explained at the document in the above mentioned URL.

Erno

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0