53 53
quade

DB Cooper

Recommended Posts

Quote

Without Knowing the history of this situation and comunnications along with the damage all the comments has caused this Inveastigation. If I was you, I personally would not make a comment like that.However I can understand the comment, but in a sitiuation involving this perticulier case, I personally would do a lot of research before making any comment. Jerry




So, what you're sayin' is...

If you were me, you would just STFU? ;)

Sounds like good advise for you even if ya weren't me! B|










~ If you choke a Smurf, what color does it turn? ~

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Without Knowing the history of this situation and comunnications along with the damage all the comments has caused this Inveastigation. If I was you, I personally would not make a comment like that.However I can understand the comment, but in a sitiuation involving this perticulier case, I personally would do a lot of research before making any comment. Jerry




So, what you're sayin' is...

If you were me, you would just STFU? ;)

Sounds like good advise for you even if ya weren't me! B|


Funny how when there is no street cop around
(especially on off shore forums) how abuse starts
and all kinds of wild claims begin to get hurled
around, by some.

It defines the free Internet jungle which is sorely
close to losing its Liberty and its free meals at the
expense of others -

So, let me clue you into the fact that a producer
for National Public Radio has been reading this
socalled "forum" for some time, and other public
officials and interested parties, and everyone here
is on record, as is Dropzone.com itself.

Hi Quade!

So keep posting suckers. You're on Candid Camera.

And here is Jo's latest unwanted PM.

Please read this / I am not posting
From: skyjack71

Date Sent:
Jun 20, 2009, 10:22 PM
Did you read Jerry's post? He called me a liar AFTER he extracted the exact locations of the creeks .

I think you know that the words he used are not part of my vocabulary - I have said in the forum that I thought you were FBI or a writer or both. I gave Jerry the location of the creeks (their names and exactly where they converge and how far they are into the light to reach the tributary. I do hope you are a scholar and a gentleman and will do the right thing...if you wish to talk to me I do NOT have Caller ID and I do not record my conversations.

I will provide you with my number if I can be assured it will not be made public or given to anyone without my permission. My security here has already been compromised with something unrelated to Cooper.
I have been buying and taking food to the homeless who live in the woods in our area. I never thought I would live to see people actually hungery and begging for food in America. Yesterday we hit a record high in temperatures and since I spent 6 to 7 hours at the ER last night I was not able to take ice and water to them today.

You have my permission to record your conversation with me - I have given that to no one else except a man in Ca. and at one time Sluggo.

Please make no mention of this in the forum and you can email me if you want my phone number and /or if you want NO COMMUNICATIONS from me. I will honor your decision and will keep it private.

Homes4ubyjo@aol.com
Copyright©2008 by Jo Weber

Can Jo Copyright and Own things published on
DZ.com, an off shore (whatever this thing is)?
Can Jo use Dropzone.com for her own commercial
ends? Is that what DZ.com is about?

Maybe its time to call the Federal Trade Commission
and ask. I think I will.

I mean we arent doing DB Cooper so let's do DB
Dropzone. com. Maybe other Federal Agencies
including Homeland Security would be interested.

So all you little ayatollahs get your shit together.
Its Father's Day and Quade has been missing too
damned long!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Correct me if i'm wrong, but my understanding of US law is that it is legal for anyone to record a conversation in which they personally are taking part, without requiring consent of the other party?

Edited to add: the above seems to be general but it is not in all states.
http://www.citmedialaw.org/legal-guide/recording-phone-calls-and-conversations

Quote

...From a legal standpoint, the most important question in the recording context is whether you must get consent from one or all of the parties to a phone call or conversation before recording it. Federal law and many state wiretapping statutes permit recording if one party (including you) to the phone call or conversation consents. Other states require that all parties to the communication consent.

Unfortunately, it is not always easy to tell which law applies to a communication, especially a phone call. For example, if you and the person you are recording are in different states, then it is difficult to say in advance whether federal or state law applies, and if state law applies which of the two (or more) relevant state laws will control the situation
...


Skydiving: wasting fossil fuels just for fun.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Correct me if i'm wrong, but my understanding of US law is that it is legal for anyone to record a conversation in which they personally are taking part, without requiring consent of the other party?

Edited to add: the above seems to be general but it is not in all states.
http://www.citmedialaw.org/legal-guide/recording-phone-calls-and-conversations

Quote

...From a legal standpoint, the most important question in the recording context is whether you must get consent from one or all of the parties to a phone call or conversation before recording it. Federal law and many state wiretapping statutes permit recording if one party (including you) to the phone call or conversation consents. Other states require that all parties to the communication consent.

Unfortunately, it is not always easy to tell which law applies to a communication, especially a phone call. For example, if you and the person you are recording are in different states, then it is difficult to say in advance whether federal or state law applies, and if state law applies which of the two (or more) relevant state laws will control the situation
...



I have no idea. However it does seem a bit strange
to me one person on this forum Copywrites everything
she says here, on a forum owned by someone else,
in So Afrika if that is correct? Who owns the rights to
Jo's posts? Jo or DZ.com? Could Jo sue DZ.com
or the reverse if there was a dispute over ownership
or rights or useage? I assume DZ.com has thought about this and has an attorney?

If you quoted one of Jo's posts in some other forum
or in a publication would you have to pay her royalties?
Are Jo's posts tantamount to her songs or manuscripts
etc for which she has sole proprietor rights?

Jo always uses her her business address as her
email address when she posts here or sends PM's.

Has Jo copywrited her name? Some authors do
especially if their names become a product in and
of themselves, or a household word, etc.

Maybe 377 is here because he's her lawyer watching
everything for Jo? I dont know.

Maybe Quade is Jo's paid employee. I dont know.

Maybe its all pretense meant to convey importance
and authority. I dont know.

I havent checked but I doubt anyone else who
posts in the whole of Dropzone.com in all the forums
copywrites their posts?

It's all very off-putting for some reason. And it has
always killed any idea that this is an open forum.
This is Jo's forum. Dropzone.com has seen to that.
I guess we are all privileged that she allows us to be here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote



So, let me clue you into the fact that a producer
for National Public Radio has been reading this
socalled "forum" for some time, and other public
officials and interested parties, and everyone here
is on record, as is Dropzone.com itself.




Yeah...SO? :D...I should care who's keeping records regarding decoder ring detectives trying to solve a near 40 year old crime??? :ph34r::ph34r:...If NPR knocks on my door asking who Cooper was and where he is now...I'd tell 'em! :)

On the Internet I'm kind of a tongue in cheek-sarcastically dry humored sort...in short I don't take myself at all seriously, so you can just imagine how little I care about what others say or think about me...ESPECIALLY big brother.

This thread has some trivial interest in that it's often amazing to read the various theories and paths pursued in their investigation.

You guys are certainly to be commended at times for the creative thinking and the lengths at which you go to prove & disprove various hypothesis.

All that being said, is it really necessary or beneficial to disrespect ANYONE that is a part of the discussion?

Of course I understand, and even empathize with the frustration that goes along with trying to 'speak' logically to some here.

...but name calling, veiled threats, publicly posting 'private messages' after a specific request not to do so ~ do you really think anything said or done @ dropzone.com is important enough in the grand scheme of things to warrant that kind of behavior?

If ya'll were trying to cure cancer by Thursday, I'd understand the suspension of simple civility...I guess when you realize the windmill is winning the battle, panic sets in and decency is set aside.





When I see Black Helicopters I don't get paranoid, just horny for a skydive! B|










~ If you choke a Smurf, what color does it turn? ~

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Georger, please SIUCC



Did you mean to search for: sicc

SIUCC meaning - Acronym Attic
Acronym Attic - 1 unverified meanings of SIUCC abbreviation. Definition of SIUCC.
www.acronymattic.com/SIUCC.html - Similar

Twitter / Jeff Rose, CFP®: @splatteredink The SIUCC ...
splatteredink The SIUCC ad looks awesome! Good job.
twitter.com/jeffrosecfp/status/1996121543 - Cached - Similar

carus : On the wind-velocity measurements from Venera spacecraft ...
Siucc f, serving as a reference for the descent, is not pleasured directly, any error or unpredicted deviation in the frequency will be taken as a change of ...
linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0019103577901671 - Similar
by VV Kerzhanovich - 1977 - Cited by 2 - Related articles

Singapore Island Country Club : Home
SICC vs Royal Bangkok Sports Club Interport Match ... SICC Junior Programme - July 2009 New Registration ... 15 June 09 - SICC Junior Club Championship ...
Contact Us - Membership - Courses Information - Reciprocal Clubs
www.sicc.org.sg/ - Cached - Similar




SIUCC = Suck It Up, CupCake

"Once we got to the point where twenty/something's needed a place on the corner that changed the oil in their cars we were doomed . . ."
-NickDG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Question to all:

:|Should I since letting Jerry know exactly the location of the probable area Cooper walked and his adamant explanation made in anger - reveal to the Media and The FBI that exact location?

Jerry's response indicated to me that he just might destroy any evidence that might be left in that location. I have NOT revealed the area in detail for fear of treasure hunters trampling private and/or state owned property. I am not able to search the area myself. I had trusted Jerry to do this.

I expect after all these yrs no evidence is left but there is always that small miracle.

If "the Tom" who excavated our dog in hopes of finding Duane buried something with the dog is Tom Kaye, (I assume this is what Jerry was hinting at)then he is aware that when we did this the body was in a plastic bag inside of a hard plastic storage container. The dog was buried in 1994 and the body retrieved in 2001.

The last time I saw the ticket was prior to the death of our family pet and Duane wanted private time with the remains in the garage. I had already gone to extensive efforts to find the grave site...with metal detectors on my own and with a group in this area.

Duane had put something in a pill bottle and I indicated he was putting this with the remains. I thought maybe he had put the papers on the dog in the coffin with with him. After the Cooper thing I thought he may have put the airline ticket in that pill bottle and buried it with "his" dog. The papers on the pet where in our files - so I wanted to know what was in that pill bottle.

The state of decomposure was gross - the body was whole, but liquifing - the smell was over powering. It makes me sick everytime I remember it. One of the men who was there - suggested I take the body to someone who could examine it more thoroughly.
We reburied the dog and I could find NO one who would excavate him and do a more thorough examination. I expected the body to be dried up not still in early stages of decomposure.

Yes, his rubber Duckey had been buried with him.
He used that as his "ball".


:|I was encouraged by someone who reads this forum to make this post to clarify what had been said in a previous post.

One more clarification: Duane's said "I'm Dan Cooper". This has never been stated differently that I am aware of. When I did not comprehend his explanation of what he was talking about...he said "Oh, F--- Let it die with me!" He WAS not on drugs at that time - they were administered by the nursing staff right after this outburst because they thought he might be upset about his decision to cease treatement. All that evening and the next day he tried to talk thru the drugs - "we" didn't understand what he was trying to say.

A few days later - he told me we needed to talk.
He didn't want the pills. He was spitting them out into a tissue under his pillow. When the staff found this out they made him open his mouth to be sure he was swallowing the morphine tablets and they also put a patch on him. Just prior to this he had asked me to take him for a drive home. The staff had told me I could take him outside or for a ride. He was a large man and I didn't feel I would be able to handle him so we never took that ride...but, I did take him outside in a wheel chair several times.

This story has never changed - there are many things on the web site and that journalist have written where they took literary rights. This is what I have always stated to them. There has never been any doubt what he said when he said "I'm Dan Cooper". It was how he said it --- he cooed out the Coooooooper.

He was very lucid and just prior to that we had been discussing some other things that involved his ceasing treatment and my asking him if he was positive this was what he wanted to do. This is when he asked me if anyone else was in the room. The way the room was designed he could not see the entry from his bed.


PS: My email address is Homes4ubyjo
I am retired, but never gave up that handle, because I always thought I might go back to work after my husband died. I sold a lot of home with that handle.

Copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 2013, 2014, 2015 by Jo Weber

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jo More BS From you. I don't destroy evidence and never have.I'm not like you and try to faulsify evidence with made up stories.Remember when you called me a couple days ago and said you were not a lier. I agree! Your a good story teller and a good fiction writer. Your stories are way beyond belief and even your friends don't believe them. Now back to Tom the guy that came to your house and filmed the documentary in which the rubber ducky was found. YOU the one ! He's the one that paid your phone bills for you Just to get the story.He almost didn't produce your part of the documentary. Why! because he knew what you were saying was fabricated. The only reason he did produce it, is because it showed how far people would go to get Notority.That is how everything came into being. Now! What about Doug Pasternick(Sp)the one that wrote the story on Duane. You made a fool out of him, and you and he are not friends anymore, He even told you why.Jo your atacks on those that will not except Duane as being Cooper Is Fruitless.You have done a great job of proving that Duane could have never of been Cooper I realize that you will take portions of this post and try to use part of it to your benifit. A word of advice don't do it because I will only post more facts .Congradulations. Jerry

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Jo More BS From you. I don't destroy evidence and never have.I'm not like you and try to faulsify evidence with made up stories.Remember when you called me a couple days ago and said you were not a lier. I agree! Your a good story teller and a good fiction writer. Your stories are way beyond belief and even your friends don't believe them. Now back to Tom the guy that came to your house and filmed the documentary in which the rubber ducky was found. YOU the one ! He's the one that paid your phone bills for you Just to get the story.He almost didn't produce your part of the documentary. Why! because he knew what you were saying was fabricated. The only reason he did produce it, is because it showed how far people would go to get Notority.That is how everything came into being. Now! What about Doug Pasternick(Sp)the one that wrote the story on Duane. You made a fool out of him, and you and he are not friends anymore, He even told you why.Jo your atacks on those that will not except Duane as being Cooper Is Fruitless.You have done a great job of proving that Duane could have never of been Cooper I realize that you will take portions of this post and try to use part of it to your benifit. A word of advice don't do it because I will only post more facts .Congradulations. Jerry



:)NO ONE has ever paid a phone bill for me - NOT ever in my whole life. I have ALL of my phone bills from day one when I contacted the FBI until I remarried.

The only thing I have accepted in all of the interviews that I did was the flight to WA. (their idea) and my expenses where taken care of while I was there - I did change my flight home which cost $100 and they reimbursed me for that. A documentary was filmed at my home and I asked for absolutely nothing and received nothing. Another documentary was done on the Gulf and the only thing I accepted was Lunch at the Holiday Inn.

I still have the man's name in my file and I will contact him to see if what you say is true. If he did say he didn't believe me that would be his right to do so as everyone is entitled to their own opinion.

Regarding Doug Pasternak - I can assure you that he still keeps tabs on me......in fact, I am going to copy and paste this email to him.
Copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 2013, 2014, 2015 by Jo Weber

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Rude awakening: Shelly! just informed me that I have gotten off track. Her comment is as follows( Jerry you have just become a person like Jo And others. Instead of trying to solve this case and proving that Jo is what everyone knows she is. You have taken yourself to the next lower level. You have proven ,What that others point of views doesn't matter or that people will come up with made up stories like what is happening on Dropzone.) She is right Badgering a Known Fabricator is fruitless. My appoligizies to all on the Forum. Jo enjoy your stories Aparently that is what you need to Gain attention. Jerry

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If "the Tom" who excavated our dog in hopes of finding Duane buried something with the dog is Tom Kaye, (I assume this is what Jerry was hinting at)then he is aware that when we did this the body was in a plastic bag inside of a hard plastic storage container. The dog was buried in 1994 and the body retrieved in 2001.



What!?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There has never been any doubt what he said when he said "I'm Dan Cooper". It was how he said it --- he cooed out the Coooooooper.




"When Jo Weber failed to understand what her husband was talking about, he became angry and shouted "Oh, let it die with me." (Associated Press
2000)

"*Skyjack71 didn't know who Dan Cooper was, but she can clearly remember the name because he pronounced it in a peculiar way. When she continued to challenge Duane on the confession (telling him that his story was non-sense), Duane cursed loudly. Having heard Duane getting upset and thinking he was having trouble dealing with his pain and the idea of his ultimate death, the nurses rushed in and immediately gave him a shot of morphine."
( safecrackingPLF Dec 20, 2007, 10:16 AM )

But not knowing who DB Cooper even was, Jo was
on the phone to Himmelsbach a few short months
later - she went right to the top without contacting
anyone else! No intermediaries. That's her story.

But she posted here a few months ago she and
Duane discussed McCoy and Cooper at Virginia
Beach.

So which version of Jo's story is correct?

Whatever the case is, Jo decided not to honor
Duane request made in anguish: ""Oh, let it die
with me."

Jo was in fact on the phone to Himmelsbach a few
short months later.

If she didnt have any idea who DB Cooper was
how in hell did she know who Ralph Himmelsbach was! ?

And, if she didnt know who Cooper was how could
she judge Duane was talking "nonsense", to turn
right around and call lead Cooper investigator
Himmelsbach about it, in violation of her husband's
request that she should let his nonsense which
amounted to nothing to Jo, DIE WITH HIM!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jo read the book That was Called what realy Happened. In the book it placed cooper ,Putting the money under the the cowitz river bridge. When I first talked to her,She told me that Duane was driving accross that bridge on I5 Bridge . Then continued north to the Cowitz river bridge And said that under the bridge is where Duane said Cooper Burried his money. She got that Info From one of the Books.Then she tried to get some of the nurses at the hospital where Duane was dying to say that Duane said he was cooper . A couple years later she found a person that would say that they heard duane say he was cooper . This was found to be another fabrication.Then she found Doug P . Now remember that She never implicated Duane as the Hyjacker untill latter years. At that time frame all she realy wanted was to prove that Duane May have Known who cooper was.Then it was built up to a point that she thought she could make money. She contacted a book Writer . I talked to this writer. She was going to write a book for Jo But Only If Jo could prove that Duane was involved in the Hyjacking.This is what got Jo started on her Quest.Jo if you would like I will give phone numbers and name's to all It" your Call

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Maybe 377 is here because he's her lawyer watching
everything for Jo? I dont know.



Nope. Never represented Jo. Wouldn't want to. I couldn't give her such a hard time if she were my client. ;)

I REALLY don't think Jo has a money angle here. If she does I sure haven't seen it. I think she is sincere in her beliefs and isn't seeking fame and fortune, just closure. I don't think Duane was Cooper. Jo does. We simply disagree respectfully. What is so damned hard about that?

Airtwardo and I think exactly alike on big brother monitoring this forum. Highly unlikely, but bring it on. Who cares?

Attention: C4, dirty bomb, isotope, water supply, diesel, nitrates, ammonium, aerosol pathogens, are ya listening or word matching out there NSA CIA FBI DHS? Just testing your system and my first amendment rights. As you were men. Carry on.

As for all this copyright nonsense, ignore it if you don't like it. Do you really think Jo would go to federal court and sue over you quoting her posts? I doubt that very much. Look up the "fair use doctrine" in copyright law.

This forum is pretty anarchistic. Don't get all hung up on intellectual property laws cause this here forum is the wild west pardner.

Yee haw.

377
2018 marks half a century as a skydiver. Trained by the late Perry Stevens D-51 in 1968.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I didn't know who Dan Cooper was and it was 1 yr and 2 months after Duane died I found out Dan Cooper was - D.B. Cooper. Had Duane told me D.B. Cooper maybe things would have clicked before. As it was it took a conversation with a gentleman friend who suggested D.B.Cooper and as the story goes I checked out a book from the library a couple of wks later and that is when I discovered who Dan Cooper was.

Himmelsbach's was mentioned in that book.
Now you know the rest of the story, but you do know what is cooking on the stove?
Copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 2013, 2014, 2015 by Jo Weber

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Jo read the book That was Called what realy Happened. In the book it placed cooper ,Putting the money under the the cowitz river bridge. When I first talked to her,She told me that Duane was driving accross that bridge on I5 Bridge . Then continued north to the Cowitz river bridge And said that under the bridge is where Duane said Cooper Burried his money. She got that Info From one of the Books.Then she tried to get some of the nurses at the hospital where Duane was dying to say that Duane said he was cooper . A couple years later she found a person that would say that they heard duane say he was cooper . This was found to be another fabrication.Then she found Doug P . Now remember that She never implicated Duane as the Hyjacker untill latter years. At that time frame all she realy wanted was to prove that Duane May have Known who cooper was.Then it was built up to a point that she thought she could make money. She contacted a book Writer . I talked to this writer. She was going to write a book for Jo But Only If Jo could prove that Duane was involved in the Hyjacking.This is what got Jo started on her Quest.Jo if you would like I will give phone numbers and name's to all It" your Call




My Call::)
[:/]The only reason I-5 was ever mentioned was you and others convincing me I had to be on the Columbia. I had only been to Wa that one time - if you talk to the TV Crew you will know I specifically ruled out the Lewis and the Columbia in 2001. You were adamant that no such place as I describe existed...insisting I had to be on the Columbia. After all you were the expert and you knew Wa - who was I to question your expertise?

I never spoke to the nurses at that hospital except when Duane was a resident there.

I still stand-by - If he wasn't Cooper he sure as hell knew who was. Only because at that time I had no confirmation he was - other than what I saw and held in my hands. I had writers and production companies contact me and it was the continued investigative work of myself and many many others that kept adding up to a Yes. I am the one who told the writers I needed more proof. There has only been one female writer who assisted me - this being in the very beginng around 1998. She wanted to do the book - I wanted more proof and she felt we could find it. I wanted to wait until the FBI had done all it was going to do. When I needed her she had move back to St. Thomas and I could find no contact number for her through her prior employer. They promised to give her a message.

:SJerry, who D.B. Cooper was has been swept under the rug long enough. I told you I was sending your post to a "friend". You could have been part of what is happening, but you chose to spend your time on this forum trying to make me look like a fool - all you have done is make not only a fool of yourself, but set yourself up for certain ridicule in the coming months. You see I do know what is cooking.

First and foremost - eat your words about Doug Pasternak - you have pie on your face. :)He researched and talked to me for for over 2 yrs before he convinced me to go public. I wanted more proof but all it took was an FBI agent telling me a lie in early 2000 with me holding documentation to the contrary.

I had no Quest - and was NOT motivated by money. I could have taken money a long time ago, but that was NOT what I wanted - I wanted the truth and the truth was out there - you just had to know where to look. It took better and more informed individuals to bring this to an end and Jerry I promise you - you will not like it, because you are not part of the solution...in fact you may well have side tracked me successfully, but others working on my behalf ignored you. What I was told was NOT complimentary - you maybe the very reason my search has gone on for so long.

If the FBI and Others are monitoring this forum - more power to them because they should have been using their time and money for more productive things. The answer was right in front of me within the first 2 yrs of the research. When this part of my search was mentioned it was ignored as some things had a way of just being wiped out like they never existed and only mentioned if I was the one proposing it. When you find what that was then you will have taken the first step to solving the case of D.B. Cooper.

Guys - I am not teasing and I want to tell you, but I can't . In a very few months all of you will know. In this age of computers with more and more knowledge being put out there - it was inevitable that someone with just a little information, a hunch and an open mind would stumble upon the
Key to Cooper.

Blue Skies, Rainbows and a Peace of mind I haven't felt in yrs...it is a wonderful feeling.....you can't put a dollar sign on that.
Copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 2013, 2014, 2015 by Jo Weber

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I didn't know who Dan Cooper was and it was 1 yr and 2 months after Duane died I found out Dan Cooper was - D.B. Cooper. ... it took a conversation with a gentleman friend who suggested D.B.Cooper and ... I checked out a book from the library a couple of wks later and that is when I discovered who Dan Cooper was. Himmelsbach's was mentioned in that book.



So that would be 1995 + 1 yr 2 months + couple of weeks which makes it Feb-March of 1996 when
you found out who Cooper/Himmelsbach were.

In May 2008 you said:

"4. Tosaws Book was published in 1984 - but I did not see or read that book my self until 1997, but Duane probably did...he just didn't bring it around me or I didn't know what it was about.
5. Norjack did not make the streets until 1986 - this is the book he had at our house, but I didn't know what the book was about...I have told that story before so need to retell it. (May 2008)

So which is it, 1996 or 1997 when you read
Tosaw's book? Your new date as of tonight is now
early in 1996.

And why would you have to go to a library when you
already had NORJACK in your house (since 1986?)?
I guess I should assume you just didnt know what
a book titled NORJAK was, if it was even out on your shelf to see.

I am confused. Can you see how your versions are
difficult to follow because they conflict?

Im just searching for the truth like you.

As for what's cooking on your stove - how would
I know?

I will say I am not taking sides in your debate with
Jerry Thomas. He says one thing. You say another.
Nobody has presented any hard data yet, as
Snowmman would say.

But, I am wondering if there is ever going to be any
space open on this forum to discuss DB Cooper,
since you dominate EVERYTHING here daily. Or
should we once again just consider going elsewhere?

The last time you relented you started right back up
because you felt you "had" to. You dont allow any
objective discussion of anything here. You tease
and dont present real facts substantiated by any
thing - no data at all. I know you have your fans
here, but are you going to allow us to discuss DB
Cooper or not?

It's really that simple, as I see it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I was May 25 1996 when I read the book and contacted the FBI. Duane died March 28 1995.

Georger stated:
So which is it, 1996 or 1997 when you read Tosaw's book? Your new date as of tonight is now early in 1996.

Jo retorts:
The book I read in May of 1996 was a part fiction and part fact - called D.B. Cooper What Really Happened. I ordered Tosaws book after Himmelsbach told me about it. Remember I did not even have a computer in 1996 - not until 2000.


Georger stated:
And why would you have to go to a library when you
already had NORJACK in your house (since 1986?)?

Jo retorts
You don't read much do you? How many time do I have to repeat the story about NORJACK. The book for 1986 I never got to read. Remember - I told Duane I wanted to read it when he got through with it - he told me it was nothing I would be interested in. When I asked later about the book - it was gone. He said one of the guys at the office wanted to read it.

It was after I talked to Himmelsbach that he sent me a copy of NORJACK in 1996 after I had read the Max Gunther book in May of 1996.
Copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 2013, 2014, 2015 by Jo Weber

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I was May 25 1996 when I read the book anc contacted the FBI. Duane died March 28 1995.

Georger stated:
So which is it, 1996 or 1997 when you read Tosaw's book? Your new date as of tonight is now early in 1996.

Jo retorts:
The book I read in May of 1996 was a part fiction and part fact - called D.B. Cooper -What Really Happened . I ordered Tosaws book after Himmelsbach told me about it. Remember I didn;t even have a computer in 1996 - not until 2000.


Georger stated:
And why would you have to go to a library when you
already had NORJACK in your house (since 1986?)?

Jo retorts
You don't read much do you? How many time do I have to repeat the story about NORJACK. The book for 1986 I never got to read. Remember - I told Duane I wanted to read it when he got through with it - he told me it was nothing I would be interested in. When I asked later about the book - it was gone - he said one of the guys at the office wanted to read it.

It was after I talked to Himmelsbach that he sent me a copy of NORJACK in 1996 after I had read the Max Gunther book in May of 1996.

Georger stated:
As for what's cooking on your stove - how would
I know?

Jo retorts;
You won't know until it is ready to be served. Any more silly question and I just might dump the bowl in your lap. Since it is extremely hot I don't think you will find that very comfortable.



I guess I need to take that as a threat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Georger stated:
As for what's cooking on your stove - how would
I know?

Jo retorts;
You won't know until it is ready to be served. Any more silly question and I just might dump the bowl in your lap. Since it is extremely hot I don't think you will find that very comfortable.



Are you threatening mer and my family?

Shoud I call LE now?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


Georger stated:
As for what's cooking on your stove - how would
I know?

Jo retorts;
You won't know until it is ready to be served. Any more silly question and I just might dump the bowl in your lap. Since it is extremely hot I don't think you will find that very comfortable.



Are you threatening mer and my family?

Shoud I call LE now?



Jo you have made a threat.
I am waiting for a reply.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

people need to lighten up here. [:/]

Seriously internet forums tend to have a "tone" and in general the moderators (Quade) have been extremely generous in allowing this particular thread to stay alive with the general tone that it contains. If anyone cares to go and browse the bonfire/speakers corner and see that threads are locked/recycled for alot less than what goes on here.

While this thread is focused on Cooper it makes an entertaining read and I will be the first to admit that I don't give a damn who Cooper was, and therefore I have no "vested" interest in seeing this thread live on. But some people do take a serious interest in who Cooper was and I think the fact that the thread is in history and trivia means that a certain level of focus in in order.

Experienced jumper - someone who has made mistakes more often than I have and lived.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

people need to lighten up here. [:/]

Seriously internet forums tend to have a "tone" and in general the moderators (Quade) have been extremely generous in allowing this particular thread to stay alive with the general tone that it contains. If anyone cares to go and browse the bonfire/speakers corner and see that threads are locked/recycled for alot less than what goes on here.

While this thread is focused on Cooper it makes an entertaining read and I will be the first to admit that I don't give a damn who Cooper was, and therefore I have no "vested" interest in seeing this thread live on. But some people do take a serious interest in who Cooper was and I think the fact that the thread is in history and trivia means that a certain level of focus in in order.



Its better to be safe than sorry.

Law enforcement has been notified and is aware
of the situation.

Thanks.
Georger

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

53 53