DB Cooper

[FLYJACK 772]

1 hour ago, olemisscub said:

I can’t explain, sorry. But I’m right and have won this debate. 

There is no debate.

Not sure what School you went to but you should ask for a refund.

Edited yesterday at 01:39 AM by FLYJACK

[FLYJACK 772]

 

[olemisscub 549]

1 hour ago, FLYJACK said:

There is no debate.

Not sure what School you went to but you should ask for a refund.

You’re wrong. This is privileged information, so I can’t actually reveal it yet. My book publishers have advised me not to reveal it. 

[FLYJACK 772]

8 hours ago, olemisscub said:

You’re wrong. This is privileged information, so I can’t actually reveal it yet. My book publishers have advised me not to reveal it. 

So, who cares.. you have a history of conflating and distorting evidence and elevating assumptions to facts.. 

Tina showing Cooper how to use the stairs does not mean he used them correctly, he was alone when he used the stairs.. Your claim is bogus.

[FLYJACK 772]

The erosion here occurred before these bills fanned out. (Tom theorized that the fanning was from rolling along the bottom)

The fanning occurred before the bills stuck together.. 

That supports Palmer's conclusion that the erosion was from tumbling along the bottom..

The money eroded by rolling/tumbling along the bottom and fanned out before landing on TBAR.

 

[Kamkisky 13]

I think getting the stairs to work is likely more about expectations than not being able to work a simple lever. Cooper had just walked up the fully descended stairs. I think it’s reasonable to assume he thought the stairs would fully deploy. I’d think the stairs were fully hydraulic and not gravity going down.
 

So Cooper uses the lever but the stairs don’t go all the way down so he thinks something is wrong and we get the whole interphone episode. Eventually he figures out his weight is going to be enough for him to exit and everything “is good now.”  

Edited yesterday at 03:56 PM by Kamkisky

[olemisscub 549]

3 hours ago, FLYJACK said:

So, who cares.. you have a history of conflating and distorting evidence and elevating assumptions to facts.. 

Tina showing Cooper how to use the stairs does not mean he used them correctly, he was alone when he used the stairs.. Your claim is bogus.

lol how are you still not getting this?

[FLYJACK 772]

Sure, expectations play a role.. but he was successful eventually.

The stairs are hydraulic assist or gravity drop depending how you operate the lever.

The evidence indicates the stair light went on twice,, that can only happen if the lever was put back into the uplock detent. That light goes on when the lever is moved from the uplock detent, not when the stairs are opened. So, when the light first went on that does not indicate the stairs were actually open.

Also, Mac got out at 100mph faster albeit a small opening.

The sled test had no problem with the stairs staying up due to speed.

 

The takeaway is that the speed wasn't the real issue for Cooper having trouble getting them open.. That was the perception.

[FLYJACK 772]

16 minutes ago, olemisscub said:

lol how are you still not getting this?

Who cares, what you claim to have is very insignificant and irrelevant.. 

What I have is one of the biggest advancements in many years.. you would take it and use in your book, 100%, it would get blasted in the media and take the case in a different direction.. A legitimate game changer.

You are playing a false equivalency.

Keep your little insignificant info to yourself... keep everything you have,, save it for your book that might be out in 10 years.

[olemisscub 549]

10 minutes ago, FLYJACK said:

Who cares, what you claim to have is very insignificant and irrelevant.. 

What I have is one of the biggest advancements in many years.. you would take it and use in your book, 100%, it would get blasted in the media and take the case in a different direction.. A legitimate game changer.

You are playing a false equivalency.

Keep your little insignificant info to yourself... keep everything you have,, save it for your book that might be out in 10 years.

What I’m doing is indeed quite aggravating, isn’t it?

[FLYJACK 772]

5 minutes ago, olemisscub said:

What I’m doing is indeed quite aggravating, isn’t it?

No, it is juvenile actually.

It is not the same since I told you what I had, just not sharing it for a legit reason. Further, it wasn't even needed for that debate, it was extraneous.

You claim to have something you can't explain in an attempt to make a point.

These are not the same, not equivalent in importance or substance.

I don't care what you have, I don't think I have learned anything significant in this case from you.. it would make no difference if I never heard from you on anything ever again.

There is no way you could know for a fact what Cooper did with the lever, not even from a rare Tina interview.

[olemisscub 549]

2 minutes ago, FLYJACK said:

No, it is juvenile actually.

It is not the same since I told you what I had, just not sharing it for a legit reason. Further, it wasn't even needed for that debate, it was extraneous.

You claim to have something you can't explain in an attempt to make a point.

These are not the same, not equivalent in importance or substance.

I don't care what you have, I don't think I have learned anything significant in this case from you.. it would make no difference if I never heard from you on anything ever again.

There is no way you could know for a fact what Cooper did with the lever, not even from a rare Tina interview.

You’ve not learned anything of significance from anyone in this case because only your preconceived notions and conclusions can be correct. 

And you’re wrong, what I have is game changing as well. I also have an image of Cooper. It absolutely indicates that Comp A is the better sketch… You and everyone else in the Vortex just have to trust me. My publishers won’t let me release it though. It’s simply too important. 

[Robert99 60]

2 hours ago, olemisscub said:

You’ve not learned anything of significance from anyone in this case because only your preconceived notions and conclusions can be correct. 

And you’re wrong, what I have is game changing as well. I also have an image of Cooper. It absolutely indicates that Comp A is the better sketch… You and everyone else in the Vortex just have to trust me. My publishers won’t let me release it though. It’s simply too important. 

Olemiss, when will your book be published.  I'll be very happy to buy one of the first copies.

[FLYJACK 772]

2 hours ago, olemisscub said:

You’ve not learned anything of significance from anyone in this case because only your preconceived notions and conclusions can be correct. 

And you’re wrong, what I have is game changing as well. I also have an image of Cooper. It absolutely indicates that Comp A is the better sketch… You and everyone else in the Vortex just have to trust me. My publishers won’t let me release it though. It’s simply too important. 

You are the biggest waste of time..

[georger 268]

12 hours ago, olemisscub said:

You’ve not learned anything of significance from anyone in this case because only your preconceived notions and conclusions can be correct. 

And you’re wrong, what I have is game changing as well. I also have an image of Cooper. It absolutely indicates that Comp A is the better sketch… You and everyone else in the Vortex just have to trust me. My publishers won’t let me release it though. It’s simply too important. 

Credibility is not an issue! Please continue at your convenience!

[FLYJACK 772]

6 hours ago, georger said:

Credibility is not an issue! Please continue at your convenience!

You guys need to decide if you want to be right or want to solve this case..

[olemisscub 549]

1 hour ago, FLYJACK said:

You guys need to decide if you want to be right or want to solve this case..

You’re already solved it though. So really what you’re saying is we just all need to accept that you’re right about everything you say. 

[FLYJACK 772]

31 minutes ago, olemisscub said:

You’re already solved it though. So really what you’re saying is we just all need to accept that you’re right about everything you say. 

Projection.. and another lie..

 

What do I have wrong, Ryan.. 

You use ad hominem attacks but can't articulate anything that I have wrong.

because you are dishonest.

Your obsession with attacking me has now reached the level of harassment.

 

Edited 1 hour ago by FLYJACK

[olemisscub 549]

35 minutes ago, FLYJACK said:

Projection.. and another lie..

 

What do I have wrong, Ryan.. 

You use ad hominem attacks but can't articulate anything that I have wrong.

because you are dishonest.

Your obsession with attacking me has now reached the level of harassment.

 

My obsession with YOU?

You are the one who watches me speak for three hours trying to find errors I make. 

And I can absolutely articulate what you have wrong. You think William Frederick Hahneman was Cooper. Period. 

Seriously, what are you going to do when we get a vault drop in the next few months where his name is listed as being shown to the witnesses and they reject him? You better be practicing Yoga or something because you may break your back bending over backward trying to spin that. It'll be hilarious. Popcorn will be popped to watch you spin that.