52 52
quade

DB Cooper

Recommended Posts

Quote


When Cooper did his hijack in 71 thats all jumpers were talking about for weeks.



random guess: the scene in 1971 was dominated by guys in their late 20's and early 30's who had started jumping within the last 4 years?

when you say "all jumpers were talking" did this include jumpers with WA experience back to '62?

377: How many guys did you know when you started, that had been jumping in '62? Remember Issaquah has just opened in '62.

(I like '62 because of the 727 rollout connection and also because Cooper would have been in his mid 30's then)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


Quote

Back in the early '70s, it was not well known that a 727's rear door could be opened in flight. But the CIA had been doing it for years in Southeast Asia, dropping agents into enemy territory from the back end of an unmarked Boeing 727. For a while, the FBI thought Cooper was ex-military and might have moonlighted for the CIA. It's something they looked into.



They seem to think this went beyond test flights (a la 377's version - why spend all that money and not use it?)



yeah Orange1, I thought maybe the author was speculating. Obviously since we know more now, it's easy to think the author knew even more. Maybe he just had the info we have and speculated beyond that.

Did you also note what the author said R. said about the flight path negotiation with Cooper? Ckret has said there was no negotiation. So maybe there wasn't and the article is wrong, and we should assume the article is wrong all over.

Like I say, I usually end with thinking "there are no facts in the Cooper case"... :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Did you also note what the author said R. said about the flight path negotiation with R.? Ckret has said there was no negotiation. So maybe there wasnt' and the article is wrong, and we should assume the article is wrong all over.

Like I say, I usually end with thinking "there are no facts in the Cooper case"... :)



Yeah I saw that. I don't recall anything in the transcripts about asking for V-23 though (it may be there & i just don't recall it), but the other stuff (flaps etc) was in there. I assumed inaccuracies in the article. The article for example says Cooper scooped up his cigarette butts and took them with him.

But the article also shows that whoever first 'speculated' on the CIA drops here (& I think this was Jo? ) didn't need to have inside info; they just needed to have read the newspaper archives. :|
Skydiving: wasting fossil fuels just for fun.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Is the part about Cooper inspecting the rigger packing cards fact or fiction?.

377



It sure sounds wrong based on what Ckret has told us right? Like I mentioned, I wondered if Michael Taylor had made up the quotes. I sent him email a while back, but got no answer. I believe I had him quoting R. on the 30 degree issue some other place, which I disbelieved until we got the 2nd ckret transcript.

Taylor could just be cobbling together random info of unknown source.

I only bring it up again, because I ran into the article, and I remembered Rataczak on the Discovery show.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


But the article also shows that whoever first 'speculated' on the CIA drops here (& I think this was Jo? ) didn't need to have inside info; they just needed to have read the newspaper archives. :|



good point Orange1.

I've realized, that for all our discussion, and supposed "new info" from Ckret, that there's really nothing new, other than minor fact correcting, that hasn't been published in some form before.

I did notice that the parachute was initially stated to be 28', but then in later years, H. was quoted as saying Cooper would have hit the ground at 50 mph because of winds and the small 26' parachute. So I think even the FBI got info messed up at various times.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
trying to find the earliest CIA reference (myth or fact) for the 727: (before the Taylor 1996)

11/24/91, New York Times, in a joking article
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9D0CE7DB1E30F937A15752C1A967958260

"In 1971, no civilian knew that a 727 could be flown with the aft stairway extended. But 727's had been used in Vietnam for years to drop agents behind enemy lines. Only the C.I.A. knew this"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok where do I start with all the comments you all have made.

First off Georger is NOT FBI, take it for a fact.
I did get into this because of him.
He contacted me because we knew of each other through astronomy circles and he knew I could do different types of spectroscopy from stars to dirt.

My connection to Seattle and the Burke Museum is complete coincidence. I got affiliated there because a good friend of mine from Chicago got a job there as the head paleo guy.

I know a LOT of really smart people. Only a few are on my collaborators page at www.tomkaye.com. Check them out if you want to see the range of things I am involved with. I certainly dont have all the smarts to pull something like this off but I sure as hell know where to go to find the right people.

Our investigation will NOT be able to identify Cooper.
It will correct miss information and give a clearer story on what potentially happened.
I am confident enough to publish the results but as with most high profile research, there will be MANY who argue with our conclusions. That's the way this business works. You can use those arguments to say we blew it, or look at the facts and see if you agree.

Some things we can be very confident of. I can tell you with 99% certainty that Ingrams did not fake the burial at Tena Bar. The exact story of how they found it though is wide open for debate.

There are many theories on what happened to Cooper that night and how the money got to Tena Bar. If we can knock down a big chunk of them (probably not all) then we have done our job.

I never discuss things that are inside our research area here on the forum. If I ask a question or put it out for discussion, its because its bugging me. This also means I am not paying full attention to it like the transcript issue.

Our research has little to do with what people said etc. That's what you guys are working on. We are working on verifying or dismissing facts through experimentation and information given or available then. We are trying VERY hard not to use any modern commentary etc.

My life is an open book. You will see the picture of me at Quantico on my website. No need to speculate you can always just ask! :)
Tom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Aviation Week and Space Technology
Published by McGraw-Hill, 1976
Item notes: V.104 1976 Apr-Jun
Original from the University of Michigan
Digitized Nov 27, 2006

I only have the snippet view, not the full page (yet)
Note this was a major industry rag...this is 1976

A new name is presented "Civil Reserve Air Fleet"

the comment about enlarging the ventral exit, enhancing airdrop capability is mentioned.

see here. Snippet is attached. Will try to find more.
http://books.google.com/books?lr=&id=XHEgAAAAMAAJ&dq=air+america+727&q=ventral+exit&pgis=1#search_anchor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Snow, that highlighted para looks like it came from the Church report?



yup, you beat me to it.
I just checked the Church report year. It was 1975.

So...in short, the question of when the 727/CIA info was first out there, I guess was answered by you with your first post. (although the Church report doesn't mention testing etc).

So 1975 I guess was the first public knowledge.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Snow, that highlighted para looks like it came from the Church report?



yup, you beat me to it.
I just checked the Church report year. It was 1975.

So...in short, the question of when the 727/CIA info was first out there, I guess was answered by you with your first post. (although the Church report doesn't mention testing etc).

So 1975 I guess was the first public knowledge.



Just had another thought:
If it was CIA, maybe the FBI didn't have full knowledge of the CIA tests until 1975?? Or maybe it never got folded into their reports if most of their work was in 1971? Maybe Boeing didn't know everything (the people they talked to) or Boeing didn't tell them everything?

Hard to say. We'll have to probe Ckret on when the FBI found out about the CIA stuff.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Check out ROTC uniforms and regulations , National Guard Regulations and obtain the administation directory of anyone working in the Buerea of Church, Administration Offices of the LDS office in 1979 - including all other residents - Literature - and Information. Other offices not associated with the Church in 1979 were housed there - such as ROTC recruiting and representatives of certain College programs.


Reply> There were official church programs which required a coat jacket with emblem or insignia.
One of those (in a shared office space in that bldg) were the Mormon Pioneers - but I wont take the
time to find the patch on the net. You can do that
if it suits you. The use of chevrons along with that
patch denoted level or grade of the wearer. That's
just one example of the insignias that were on coats walking around in that building. Some were more conspicuous than others. Some officials wore no insignia at all. Satisfied?


Duane spent 24 yrs hiding his past and he was very good at it. I expect his freedon and his life depended on it. Those who suspected he was Cooper knew him only as John Collins and never knew his real name... they could never say one word because it would have involved them in something dark and ugly.

The other day I was told what a horrible wicked and mean man Weber was by someone who once knew him. I only had glimpses of that man and those were fleeting, accept for a few wks in 1990. What changed him? He survived what he thought was going to be the end of his life - If he was found out it meant more than just prison - it was a certain death.



Reply> But you and Duane took trips, investigated
people and things publically, Duane operating an antiques business publically ....

So which is it? Under cover or public? Or both?
Im sure you will have an explanation which accommodates both stories.

On the other hand, if you are tired of all this, and Im
sure you must be, I realise now you are simply a misunderstood person, simple in your aspect and
merely searching for the truth.

There is nothing to be gained by looking through
a glass darkling.

Georger

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Jo,

You seem to jump to some pretty big conclusions besides the Duane is Cooper one. You have posted several times that you think Georger has FBI ties. I see nothing at all that supports that conclusion. As far as I can tell we have never had more than one FBI affiliated person posting here and now we have none.

377

No she doesnt if you think about it.
A step for one is a giant leap across a casm for
another.

Georger

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

It's funny that Jo is accusing georger of being ex-FBI. I know I miss the days when I was NSA, on Project Mannequin.

So let's look at it:
What do we know about georger. Reviewing his posts:
1) He says he's in Iowa City, Iowa
2) He says he's a physicist at the Eastern Iowa Observatory and Learning Center and this is a pet project:
http://www.cedar-astronomers.org/paldows.ht
3) He says he was painting barns for cows apparently.

What's weird, is if he was involved in putting together the "Dream Team" like he says, is how did he know Tom K?

I can see the Seattle connection to Ckret for Tom K, thru the Burke Museum/univ. of wash.. But Tom is currently in AZ.
So how does georger in Iowa, get to reach out to Tom?

georger is always dropping hints like he has/had access to fbi info on the case in the past. But I don't think he really has.

What's weird, is georger introduced the "dream team" on August 27 with this post, saying the panel was assembled "some time ago". Yet by 11/24 there was zero information. In fact the sand in Tom K's lab had only been gathered 11/13/08, if the labels were true.

said georger on 8/27:

"Some time ago, a panel was assembled and
recommended to Larry Carr with the idea of examining the money.

The panel consists of recognised experts in
different areas of forensics and analysis, who will examine the money or specimens from the money cache. The analyses will be conducted in laboratory
environments equiped with the latest in technology,
including chemical, spectroscopic, and even electron
microscopy (if necessary).

Our panel will also have access to other researchers
and resources if necessary. Every person on our
panel is highly skilled, experienced, credentialed,
and a published research scientist: some with ties
to Quantico."

I can't help but think "B.S." based on the lack of results we've seen.



Now you are sounding like JO. Think what you will.

Georger

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote



Now you are sounding like JO. Think what you will.

Georger



no, you think what you will.

I thought I was pretty straightforward in saying what was what. If it's different, just say so.

Tom did..seemed fine to me.

Why obfuscate? You obviously know it drives Jo crazy.
Why bother? I couldn't believe Tom was getting into this attempt at rational discussion with Jo. We already know it doesn't work. What's the point?
Jo's just an old lady. It's shooting fish in a barrel.

I only deserve a one-liner? Surely you can do better than that!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
In my google searches, I kept on coming up with articles on the paradrop into the Belgian Congo in 1964, like this one http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-vetscor/1081045/posts
I'd ignored them as the drops were done by C-130 & B-26, and the 727 reference only came up as it was used to evacuate people off the ground.
But it suddenly occurred to me that Dan Cooper comic aficionados should see this - because the operations were done by a combination of US and Belgian personnel. Very possible that the Dan Cooper comics may have been in circulation among the Belgian troops.
Well, there were only 2 Americans with 338 Belgians in the actual drop (can we get pics of these two americans I wonder?!) but the USAF & CIA between them supplied the 3 planes so I presume there would have been any number of Americans around, probably including some or all the crew of the planes. (which included CIA trained Cuban exile pilots.)

Well, actually this goes beyond comics.
Anyone knows that CIA agents were thick on the ground in the Congo pre- and post-independence anyway. For those of you whose African history may be a little rusty, along with Castro, the CIA also had plans to assassinate Patrice Lumumba and documents apparently show that the assassination order (which in this case was successful) came directly from Eisenhower. (History has painted Lumumba as effectively Congo's Mandela and many suggest the Congo would not have descended into chaos had he been allowed to rule, but that's a what-if and a drift from our thread.)
Here's a doc that shows the USAF was active in Congo from 1960-1978: https://www.afresearch.org/skins/rims/q_mod_be0e99f3-fc56-4ccb-8dfe-670c0822a153/q_act_downloadpaper/q_obj_b01dbb8c-4f5f-4fd4-a8fa-2d1ba44c8cc4/display.aspx?rs=enginespage
Oh, and the Congo would be a cracking place to pick up a deep tan... and Africa in general would be as good a place (if not even better) than SE Asia for both Cooper and the dollar bills to disappear into.

Which reminds me that of course, CIA involvement went far beyond the Congo. As African countries gained independence through the 60s and 70s, Africa became a Cold War theatre. The Soviets (and Cubans) supplied arms and training to many countries or their independence movements, and the West "fightback" was led by the US via the CIA. For example, there were Cubans sent to Angola to help the Marxist liberation movement there and the CIA helped fund and train its opposition, the (pro-Western) Unita movement. It's common cause that the main reason the US never really got involved in sanctions against apartheid SA was because the government was pro-West. etc.

So if we are looking for Cooper as being someone with exposure to airdrops, and a good place to tan before the hijack and hide afterwards. Africa is also a possibility. What makes Asia stronger as a contender is that we know the 727 drop tests happened there, but perhaps we should consider Africa as a possible source or destination for Cooper too.
Skydiving: wasting fossil fuels just for fun.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Look at the bit on Rusty Phillips in this link - at least one example of someone who flew in both Africa (Congo, as it turns out - for those of you who don't know where Leopoldville was;)) as well as SE Asia. There must have been others.

http://www.utdallas.edu/library/uniquecoll/speccoll/aamnote/aam62.pdf

Skydiving: wasting fossil fuels just for fun.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I wonder if the Hasenfus mentioned on page 10 is the Iran Contra C 123 shootdown survivor? Has to be the same guy don't you think? As I recall he disobeyed orders and wore a chute. He jumped as the plane was going down.

Hasenfus is surely the world's best known airdrop kicker.

377
2018 marks half a century as a skydiver. Trained by the late Perry Stevens D-51 in 1968.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


Ok where do I start with all the comments you all have made.

First off Georger is NOT FBI, take it for a fact.
I did get into this because of him.
He contacted me because we knew of each other through astronomy circles and he knew I could do different types of spectroscopy from stars to dirt.

My connection to Seattle and the Burke Museum is complete coincidence. I got affiliated there because a good friend of mine from Chicago got a job there as the head paleo guy.

I know a LOT of really smart people. Only a few are on my collaborators page at www.tomkaye.com. Check them out if you want to see the range of things I am involved with. I certainly dont have all the smarts to pull something like this off but I sure as hell know where to go to find the right people.

Our investigation will NOT be able to identify Cooper.
It will correct miss information and give a clearer story on what potentially happened.
I am confident enough to publish the results but as with most high profile research, there will be MANY who argue with our conclusions. That's the way this business works. You can use those arguments to say we blew it, or look at the facts and see if you agree.

Some things we can be very confident of. I can tell you with 99% certainty that Ingrams did not fake the burial at Tena Bar. The exact story of how they found it though is wide open for debate.

There are many theories on what happened to Cooper that night and how the money got to Tena Bar. If we can knock down a big chunk of them (probably not all) then we have done our job.

I never discuss things that are inside our research area here on the forum. If I ask a question or put it out for discussion, its because its bugging me. This also means I am not paying full attention to it like the transcript issue.

Our research has little to do with what people said etc. That's what you guys are working on. We are working on verifying or dismissing facts through experimentation and information given or available then. We are trying VERY hard not to use any modern commentary etc.

My life is an open book. You will see the picture of me at Quantico on my website. No need to speculate you can always just ask! :)
Tom




I will add a few things just for context.

Im just a retired guy who thought maybe a small
panel of scientifically trained people could do
some analysis on the Cooper issue and that will
be the extent of this work, unless someone takes it further. That is all I have planned and anyone else
is welcome to do something more if they can.

Georger

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
interesting Orange1.
like any new thinking, at first hearing, my reaction is "no way", cause I guess I do accept what Ckret says about Cooper not being too sophisticated.

But, it's interesting that there was a '72 hijacking from Seattle to Algeria.

All that CIA stuff you mention is interesting. Yeah Africa was on the map I guess, in terms of political grudges etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Im just a retired guy who thought maybe a small
panel of scientifically trained people could do
some analysis on the Cooper issue



Hey Georger, I appreciate what you have done. It has taken the forum beyond just keyboard research.

Tom's transparency is blinding me. Can't he add just a bit of posing or teasing? You could sew some chevrons on your lab coat sleeve Tom ;-).

Sure wish we knew whether Cooper did or did not inspect the packing cards. If he did, the likelihood of him being a skydiver increases.

377
2018 marks half a century as a skydiver. Trained by the late Perry Stevens D-51 in 1968.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I had mentioned that apparently they started thinking the NB6 was a 26' canopy in later quotes, although initial quotes around '71-'72 seemed to peg it correctly at 28'

I've attached a snippet from a 11/23/75 article

"The agent said there was doubt Cooper was an experienced parachutist since when he jumped he took the two worst possible choices of the four parachutes...

He said the chest chute he took was one that was sewn together ...and the back chute was much smaller than the large chute he cut up to wrap the money in and tie it to him"

Now we know the NB6 had a 28' canopy.

But Here's What's Really Confusing to me. the comment about "sizes".

Do we know exactly what size canopy the cut open reserve was...Could it have been just a 24' T-7A style
? people were using those in the '60s, or ???

(see snippet attached)

It seems like everyone was wrong about chute sizes. And it wouldn't have been possible to guess right by just looking at any of the containers anyhow? Confusing how the agents rationalized things back in the '70s.

Forget all the chute selection. My thinking is that the initial request for money in a knapsack, and the no-panic-just-cut-and-tie reaction to the money bag, showed jump experience. (since other whuffos seemed to have jumped without tie-on)

It would be very interesting though if Cooper had no jump experience.

By way of example, I've attached a story about Montagnards with no jump training, going out the door (static line probably)

from "Dirty Little Secrets of the Vietnam War" By James F. Dunnigan
http://books.google.com/books?id=7t-XPOvtWUkC&pg=PA196&lpg=PA196&dq=%22paper+paratroopers%22&source=bl&ots=ytOOWEC6vB&sig=fOkdHhonC33jKYWtuG0CaXm2Hp4&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=1&ct=result

(edit) just noticed that Rod Pack's chuteless jump in '65 passed a 24' T-7A belly reserve, by example. That was in a twill, not nylon, container also.

(edit) just noticed that book page has details about the general failures of the south vietnamese insertions. Can scroll back and forth from the page link I provided above for good reading.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Do we know exactly what size canopy the cut open reserve was...Could it have been just a 24' T-7A style
? people were using those in the '60s, or ???



There were some 24 ft chest reserves still in use in the 60s. I recall something about the twill ones being disfavored or perhaps even non FAA approved and only ripstop ones being used. I avoided them like the plague when I rented reserves as they had a reputation for very hard landings. The 28 ft chest reserves looked bigger and bulkier but assured you of a better descent rate than the 24s. I jumped a USN 26 ft conical chest reserve packed in an army container. It was a sweet canopy and gave me a soft landing on my one use of it.

I never trusted what anyone told me about a rental rig so I always inspected the packing cards.

I do remember what a tight fit the 28 ft C9s were when packed in a chest container. They felt more like bricks than packed chutes, very little give if you punched one. I marveled at how the riggers could get all that fabric in the small chest container and be able to close it up.

377
2018 marks half a century as a skydiver. Trained by the late Perry Stevens D-51 in 1968.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That Paper Paratrooper story is amazing. Goes to show that you can jump with zero training and zero experience, if you are brave and lucky.

On a few occasions DZs have seen possible skydiver posers try to rent gear and make a jump. The last one I recall was a young woman who claimed a lot of jumps and knew all the right lingo but used it wrong. She claimed most of her jumps were on PCs but she wasn't nearly old enough for that to be credible. She was very vague when answering questions about gear or experience or who she knew. We politely declined her request fearing that she might be one of those intending a no pull suicide.

377
2018 marks half a century as a skydiver. Trained by the late Perry Stevens D-51 in 1968.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

52 52