yurbai 0 #1 August 30, 2004 Ok here is the question: why arent we there yet?? I mean somthing like hourse riding is there which takes more of the hourse skill then human and skydiving isn't. any thoughts??? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TALONSKY 0 #2 August 30, 2004 Although it is being considered, skydiving is not a popular sport for the masses. We have a very limited market and lets face it, unless you are into skydiving most spectators would find it boring to watch 4 way or CRW. The only one that is crowd friendly is swooping. Kirk Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,111 #3 August 30, 2004 >why arent we there yet?? Cause it's hard to build a stadium 13,000 feet tall. It's not a spectator sport. Personally, I'm glad skydiving is not an olympic sport - we will do far better as a niche non-mainstream sport than as a Pepsi-generation, everyone-does-it thrill ride. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jjiimmyyt 0 #4 August 30, 2004 QuoteAlthough it is being considered, skydiving is not a popular sport for the masses. We have a very limited market and lets face it, unless you are into skydiving most spectators would find it boring to watch 4 way or CRW. The only one that is crowd friendly is swooping. Kirk Actually I thought CRW was one of the most spectator friendly areas of our sports. When the military boys do displays over here people lap it up. "This isn't an iron lung, people. You can actually disconnect and not die." -Dave Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Remster 30 #5 August 30, 2004 Quotethan as a Pepsi-generation, everyone-does-it thrill ride. Sorry Bill... I think we're there already....Remster Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
chuckbrown 0 #6 August 30, 2004 Quote unless you are into skydiving most spectators would find it boring to watch 4 way or CRW. The only one that is crowd friendly is swooping. Kirk Hate to disagree, but CRW just absolutely blows whuffos away. Most people have no concept of what can be done with a parachute. Will agree that swooping is crowd friendly as well. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Remster 30 #7 August 30, 2004 Quotebut CRW just absolutely blows whuffos away How many people can you gather for a few hours in front of a jumbotron? Edit: typosRemster Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
chuckbrown 0 #8 August 30, 2004 QuoteQuotebut CRW just absolutely blows whuffos away How many people can you gather for a few hours in from of a jumbotron? As many as the stadium will hold. Besides, of the people who actually watched the competition, how many actually witnessed it live? More fans see sports electronically than live. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Remster 30 #9 August 30, 2004 QuoteAs many as the stadium will hold I think you have an elevated view of the interest wuffos have in the sport. My friends started to glaze over 1/2 through most of my videos, and they were edited, with music, and some of the best skydiving around: RW, FF, CReW.... It probably would gather as much interest as sailing does. People into sailing would follow it, people of the medalists countries would watch the highlights, and thats about it. I dont think 80,000 people would gather in a stadium to watch a few boats circling around in water. I wouldnt. I'm glad for Sailing its in the olympics, and I'm sure most top level skydivers would love to compete in olympics too, but I dont see it happening, nor am I too fussed about it now.Remster Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TALONSKY 0 #10 August 30, 2004 QuoteQuote unless you are into skydiving most spectators would find it boring to watch 4 way or CRW. The only one that is crowd friendly is swooping. Kirk Hate to disagree, but CRW just absolutely blows whuffos away. Most people have no concept of what can be done with a parachute. Will agree that swooping is crowd friendly as well. My statement is based off of reading Parachutist and what they stated I believe last world games and other articles about swooping. Which stated that the most viable spectators sport seems to be swooping (or something very similar) Kirk Kirk Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
chuckbrown 0 #11 August 30, 2004 Oh I agree, I doubt skydiving will make it into the Olympics, nor am I fussed about it. My point was that of any sport's viewers, the overwhelming majority view sports through an electronic medium (TV) and not in person, so the fact that you can't view skydiving in a stadium is not critical. How many people watch sailing in person? On the interest of whuffos in the sport, I'd bet that their interest in skydiving's many disciplines would be elevated beyond their interest in sychronized swimming, curling, and many other Olympic "sports." But hey, I recognize I'm biased. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
flypunk 0 #12 August 30, 2004 The only reason skydivers are not in the olympics is cuz beer drinking is not an official sport, contrary to what we've been told ... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #13 August 30, 2004 Equestrian is just one of the many useful war skills around at the revival of the olympics at the turn of the 20th Century. Had it been up for addition now, I suspect it would be declined. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron 10 #14 August 30, 2004 QuoteOk here is the question: why arent we there yet?? I mean somthing like hourse riding is there which takes more of the hourse skill then human and skydiving isn't. any thoughts??? Name an Oylimpic sport where you have to spend fossil fuel. Besides most whuffos could not care about skydiving. It does not look difficult and they can not relate to it at all."No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CanuckInUSA 0 #15 August 30, 2004 QuoteName an Oylimpic sport where you have to spend fossil fuel. Skiing, ski jumping, bobsled, etc, etc, etc. How the #### do you think they get to the top of the mountain? Ice hockey, figure skating, curling, etc, etc, etc. How the #### do you think they cool the ice? Let's also not forget the motorcycles which are used for the camera footage in the road cycling events, triathlons and marathons, etc, etc, etc. Using fossil fuel is a lame excuse. Try not to worry about the things you have no control over Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ChasingBlueSky 0 #16 August 30, 2004 Isn't motorcross in the 2008 Olympics? I believe a couple "younger" sports are being added for '08 and '10 in Canada so they can get some of the X-Games crowd. Why? Look at how many empty seats there were in Athens._________________________________________ you can burn the land and boil the sea, but you can't take the sky from me.... I WILL fly again..... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,111 #17 August 30, 2004 >Skiing, ski jumping, bobsled, etc, etc, etc. How the #### do you think >they get to the top of the mountain? Originally? Their feet. >Ice hockey, figure skating, curling, etc, etc, etc. How the #### do you > think they cool the ice? Originally? By planning such events in the winter. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CanuckInUSA 0 #18 August 30, 2004 Come on Bill. We're not talking about the stone age here. I'm just trying to make a point that using fossil fuels as an excuse for not allowing a sport into the Olympics is lame. Yes the freefall disciplines of skydiving would likely not be a hit with the fans, but the Pro Swoop Tour guys should prove to be a hit. Of course swooping is a judged event and we could open up our sport to the same controversies that exist in figure skating and gymnastics. And don't tell me they won't include swooping because someone could die. World Cup skiers have died during competition in the past and hurling yourself down a mountain at 60-90 mph isn't any less dangerous than a Pro Swooper doing their thing. Try not to worry about the things you have no control over Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,111 #19 August 30, 2004 >I'm just trying to make a point that using fossil fuels as an excuse for > not allowing a sport into the Olympics is lame. Hmm, I would be totally against Formula 1 racing in the Olympics, despite the tales of endurance that such a sport requires. Most olympic sports have their roots in purely human-powered sports. Times change, and these become mechanized. But the basics of 10 meter platform diving don't change if you climb the ladder or take an elevator; the basics of skydiving change a great deal if you can't use an aircraft. >And don't tell me they won't include swooping because someone could die. Uh, OK. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shunkka 0 #20 August 30, 2004 in the way that PRO SWOOP TOUR GOES i think in 2012 (maybe Beijing 2008)swooping will be at the olympics as a demo sport.... if we have SAILING i think swooping will have bigger audience PS sorry for my silly english ------------------------- "jump, have fun, pull" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lewmonst 0 #21 August 30, 2004 Swooping might happen because it's a spectator sport. Skydiving will probably never make it. Even with ground-to-sky live video feed, I don't think people like to watch sports they don't understand or can't go out in their back yard and try... which makes me wonder about handball.http://www.exitshot.com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
whatever 0 #22 August 30, 2004 QuoteQuotethe basics of skydiving change a great deal if you can't use an aircraft. and you can build a stadium tall enough to BASE from maybe this thread should should ask when BASE makes it into the olympics? soon to be gone Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bbarnhouse 0 #23 August 30, 2004 Well since you asked... check here Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron 10 #24 August 31, 2004 Please read the bold. Quote ------------------------------------------------------------ -------------------- In Reply To -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name an Oylimpic sport where you have to spend fossil fuel. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- All of the sports you mentioned you don't NEED to burn fuel or have motorized vehicals. You can ski or skate on natural lakes that are frozen. You don't NEED to burn fuel...It makes it easier, but you don't NEED to. QuoteUsing fossil fuel is a lame excuse. The Olympics are about HUMAN effort, not who can tune an engine better. Notice there are no motorized sports in right now? You can't skydive without an aircraft. This may chance over time, but skydiving is not a good spectator sport anyway. So even if they remmove the stigma of NEEDING an aircraft...Don't expect skydiving to suddenly become popular. Remember we could not keep skydiving in the Xgames."No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TrickyDicky 0 #25 August 31, 2004 Thye have tried to get skydiving in, and it was ruled that skydiving is not a powered sport, but the "power" only assists in the set up, not the actual execution of the sport. So therefore it is admissable. But, with it not being a very popular sport and not so spectator friendly, its probably not gonna get in any time soon. For it to be eligable: There must be a world championships in the sport (done) There must be 75 nations over 4 continenets that actually do the sport (not necessarily compete. done I think) There are actually several sports being removed from the olympics for bejing, which again doesnt help us. These include: baseball, softball, canoe slalom, some equstrian events, modern pentathlon, lightweight rowing events, racewalking and the heaviest sailing class. (may be a few more). This again isnt really good for the inclusion of parachuting. UK Skydiver for all your UK skydiving needs. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites