0
AggieDave

Jump numbers vs. time in sport

Recommended Posts

Lets use 1000 jumps for a bench mark, since its a number of beginning in this sport. What would you consider "more experienced," 1000 jumps and 2 years in the sport or 1000 jumps and 10 years in the sport?

Experienced in which way? In air skills or overall skydiving skills and why?
--"When I die, may I be surrounded by scattered chrome and burning gasoline."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Even at that it would depend on when and where in those time periods the person got their 1000 jumps.

That said, the guy that's been in the sport for 10 years probably has a lot more dead and crippled friends so you'd probably think he'd be at least a little more thoughtful on the subject of safety. Then again, it's -entirely- possible for a person to be in the sport for 10 years, doing 100 jumps per year and not really know much of anything or anyone. Could have done 2 jumps every weekend at a single Cessna DZ. That's not much and you could probably do that and never really be exposed to much.

As you can see, numbers in and of themselves don't mean anything, but are a "hint" depending on the situation.
quade -
The World's Most Boring Skydiver

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 years probably wins...more over all experience, and likely a greater variety of jumps. While it's possible they just toiled at a 182 DZ, boredom tends to win before 1000.

Someone that does 1000 in 2 w/o specializing, you wonder if they're just cranking out the jumps, diminishing returns kicking in. And if they did specialize (ie, 4way), then their experience is less broad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

10 years probably wins...more over all experience, and likely a greater variety of jumps. While it's possible they just toiled at a 182 DZ, boredom tends to win before 1000.

Someone that does 1000 in 2 w/o specializing, you wonder if they're just cranking out the jumps, diminishing returns kicking in. And if they did specialize (ie, 4way), then their experience is less broad.


Possily also get up "X" number of jumps do a rating or two and then work jumps?
You are not now, nor will you ever be, good enough to not die in this sport (Sparky)
My Life ROCKS!
How's yours doing?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
We sort of have the same question rear it's head in the BASE world as well.

As a general rule I think time in the sport is more important than raw numbers. Even though the jump numbers are the same there is greater accumulated knowledge over time.

- Z
"Always be yourself... unless you suck." - Joss Whedon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
numbers - wether jumps or years - won't tell you anything about a persons abilities, their appraoch to certain issues or their personality in general. they are just what they are - numbers

what i don't quite get is the difference wether you spent your years at a "single cessna dz" or at turbine city.... my guess: you can become excellent or remain crappy at both
The universal aptitude for ineptitude makes any human accomplishment an incredible miracle

dudeist skydiver # 666

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jump numbers in and of themselves mean almost nothing. If we are using one thousand jumps as a benchmark, then do we have a variety of learning experiences, or is it practically the same, "ONE jump" repeated 1000 times?

Ed



Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
, or is it practically the same, "ONE jump" repeated 1000 times?

Ed



>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Good point!
Specialization can be a bad thing.

Two scary scenarios are: the rich kid who makes a thousand jumps his first year, but 900 of them are doing 4-way at Turbine Town. The young guy is so intense on 4-way that he ignores everything else on the DZ, never jumped anything other than a Twin Otter and made his last 800 jumps on the same Stiletto.
Oh! By now the lines on his Stiletto are badly frayed, but he is too busy/too broke to replace them.

The other scary scenario is the loner who does a thousands hop-and-pops at a single Cessna DZ over a ten year period. He may be great at stomping discs, but has no other skills.

May be the question should be: how much time he devote to learning from other people's mistakes?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
A good illustration was a new team at Perris about 12 years ago. They were all new jumpers who formed a team early, the DZ got behind them, and they became the "hot" RW team. They made thousands of practice jumps together in a couple of years and all of them at Perris. They were all good and likable fellows, and all the young jumpers looked up to them.

The first time they went anywhere else to jump (to a different state) three of the four had Cypres fires on a low altitude RW jump when none of them knew the difference between MSL and AGL . . .

Time means more than jumps.

NickD :)BASE 194

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
thats a wierd question to ask Dave. other then being curious about how others see it I am suprised you posted this. it IS a great question but wonder if you could answer it too.



My opinion is that there is NO fast way to determine who is better; the old guy or the new fast burner.
I could list scenerios and hypotheticals all day but in reality if you put the two in mulitple real world situations they may not be any good at all.

the
Quote

plane

(<--get it?) truth is that NUMBERS are worthless. its just a case by case basis.
I've seen newer jumpers with NO KNOWLEDGE of the sport but that is expected, b/c they are new. It is our turn to teach them and show them how to find the information I've seen jumpers with lots of numbers who have little knowledge of the sport. that is dangerous because most people figure "they've been around they know whats going on."


its all about how strong the addiction is. there may be a newer jumper out there who reads every iota he finds about skydiving and educates himself about the sport. his KNOWLEDGE may be more important than someones EXPERIENCE.


theres a post for you. KNOWLEDGE VS EXPERIENCE?
My photos

My Videos

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

theres a post for you. KNOWLEDGE VS EXPERIENCE?



It takes both, salted with attitude, to develop JUDGMENT.

The issue is not experience or knowledge or any one attribute, individually, but the way they all combine to hone one's ability to evaluate and act on the various situations one encounters.

I don't care how many jumps you have or how much you have studied, if you can't put it all together in a way that keeps you and those around you intact and breathing, everything you know and do is worthless.

rl
If you don't know where you're going, you should know where you came from. Gullah Proverb

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
For anything other than good RW skills, I'd pick the guy with 10 years and 1000 jumps, especially if the jumps were made at both large and small DZs. Those small Cessna DZs teach you a couple of things I feel you can miss out on at a big turbine DZ: the ability to spot and the knowledge of weight and balance and (most likely) more jumps from low altitude. It's also a lot tougher launching a good 4-way from a Cessna than a Super Otter or Caravan. I tend to think you pick up a lot of knowledge from being on the ground with jumpers, packing and BSing, for 10 years, also. I'm sure there are exceptions, but I'd say that generally someone with 10 years in the sport is going to be more "experienced" but likely not as good at "high-performance" RW, swooping, freeflying, etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Time means more than jumps.



Absolute rubbish.

If you meant "Experience means more than jumps" then I would agree with you.

Someone who takes >10 years to get to 1,000 jumps may not be as experienced as someone who takes 3-4 yet asks the right questions and assimilates as much information as he/she can.

What about experience gained in other pastimes, e.g. paragliding? I'm sure that a paraglider pilot has seen more injuries/fatalities than your average skydiver!

I just think that skydivers can be a little narrow-minded on this subject...
--
BASE #1182
Muff #3573
PFI #52; UK WSI #13

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 years. Because with years, comes maturity.

No, really. Stop laughing. Skydivers who have been skydivers for 10 years really do mature. A 10-year jumper may be doing stupid shit today, but he was doing really stupid shit 10 years ago.

In a world full of people, only some want to fly... isn't that crazy! --Seal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't care how many jumps you have or how much you have studied, if you can't put it all together in a way that keeps you and those around you intact and breathing, everything you know and do is worthless.

***


Well stated!

Everyone learns things differently...and relates to the information differently.

I've seen guys will 5000 jumps and 20 years in...'Learn' from a newbie,
because the newbie isn't looking at things the
'same old way'.

I tend to think that I can learn something from EVERYONE...
...Even if's it's just 'learning', that a particular person is full of BS and is a hazard to all.;)

That being said...there is something to be said about time in the sport..

"There's old ones and bold ones...no old bold ones!":ph34r:










~ If you choke a Smurf, what color does it turn? ~

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
First of all, how do you define experience?
IMHO, “I have been around for a long time” and “I have seen a lot” does not immediately translate into ability to handle the difficult situation. One of the most important safety factors in skydiving is currency and a person who makes 500 jumps a year is definitely more current than a person who makes a 100. I am not trying to say that someone with 1K jumps made over two year period is more experienced, just making a point that being extremely current is good for safety.
There is another issue. When someone starts jumping a lot right after finishing AFF and knocks hundreds of jumps every year, this often means that the person really wants to LEARN. I do not agree with “he only does 4-way, therefore his experience is very narrow” opinion because those who focus and try to be good in one discipline, usually appreciate the fact that becoming good in other disciplines also takes a lot of effort. In other words, it is unlikely that these people will try to pull/do something they are not really qualified for.
On the other hand, there are quite a few people out there who have been around for years but haven’t really learned a lot about tracking well, waiving off before pitching the pilot chute and behaving in busy canopy traffic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

just making a point that being extremely current is good for safety.





Maybe it is. Or maybe it leads to a certain sense of complacency--"it's just another skydive"--which then leads to some stupid, senseless mistake, that leaves the survivors shaking their heads saying, "WTF?"

I don't know what to say. You may be right, but every friend of mine who has died these past ten years has been quite current, thank you very much. And in the absence of the last few year's issues of Parachutist, my personal statistics say that currency doesn't seem to make a whole helluva lot of difference.

rl

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That's a tricky one, though.

Uncurrent jumpers, by definition, don't jump very much. That leaves them turning up less frequently in incident reports, though an individual uncurrent jumper may be more likely to have an accident.
--
"I'll tell you how all skydivers are judged, . They are judged by the laws of physics." - kkeenan

"You jump out, pull the string and either live or die. What's there to be good at?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Okay, I think what we have seen here is there are a LOT more varibles besides #s and time in sport. A guy with 1000 hop n pops so he can swoop is less experienced that someone with less #s and less time in sport that has been doing "tall falls" that include RW, freefly,video or another disciplines such as being an instructor.

Simply put, you never know where a person is if you simply go by #s and or time in sport alone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

...The first time they went anywhere else to jump (to a different state) three of the four had Cypres fires on a low altitude RW jump when none of them knew the difference between MSL and AGL . . .



I don't understand that, could you please elaborate (pm if necessary).
New day, reset Cypres - my Cypres detects ground level when I turn it on. (You know...this is a good time to go dig out my Cypres documentation and re-check everything about it - thanks for the knock on the head.)
Every jump, reset altimeter to zero on the ground.

I understand the recent incident where a jumper turned on her Cypres at home at near MSL and then drove to the DZ which was some height above MSL and the AAD did not fire when needed.
My reality and yours are quite different.
I think we're all Bozos on this bus.
Falcon5232, SCS8170, SCSA353, POPS9398, DS239

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The guy with 10 years knows more.

The guy with two might have more skill.

I knew a guy that was going to buy a new canopy. He had been jumping about a year and was jumping a lot...He thought it was a great deal..It was a NOVA.

You can't call him experienced, even though he was skilled.
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

The guy with 10 years knows more.

The guy with two might have more skill.



Nicely said. I do believe currency is highly correlated with skill but you have to give credit to people that have been around a long time for "knowledge" or maybe more accurately "wisdom".
"We've been looking for the enemy for some time now. We've finally found him. We're surrounded. That simplifies things." CP

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sounds like you're discussing my sig line.:D

It took me 7 years to get the first thousand. Lots of school, work and being an instructor (back when that meant standing on the ground, teaching the S/L hordes) and being half broke kept me from racking up too many jumps too fast.

I think everyone is right. It's a combination of many factors, time in, number of jumps, variety of experiences, and personality. Does a person listen, or do they just charge ahead, never heeding the advice of people who are trying to keep them alive? Are they a student of the sport, trying to learn all they can, or are they just worried about how well their new rig matches their new jumpsuit? I'm way past trying to be cool, now I'm just try to stay alive.:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0