0
airtime1

Privileges of an "almost" rigger

Recommended Posts

>Maybe it's time for USPA to talk to Washington about issuing clarification or changing the Part 105 rule.

I would lean in the direction of not trying to fix what's working now, but that's just me. Other than here, riggers don't have much trouble with that section of the FAR's.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If
Quote


part 65 reg says "pack, maintain, or alter



Then does that mean that the supervising rigger has to redo not just the pack, but undo and then redo the maintenance or alteration, i.e. patch on the canopy or new BOC?

I believe that these are guidelines with some room for interpretation more than absolutes.

Tubing, so easy a caveman can do it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Then does that mean that the supervising rigger has to redo not just the pack, but undo and then redo the maintenance or alteration, i.e. patch on the canopy or new BOC?

I believe that these are guidelines with some room for interpretation more than absolutes.



If he's a master rigger he would not have to redo the repairs. Per part 65 a master rigger can supervise alterations and repairs. Per the 105 rule, he would have to redo the pack job because 105 doesn't give the option of supervising a non-certificated person packing the reserve.

Advisory circulars are guidelines. 14 CFR is a regulation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I recall that during my senior rigger practical in about 1976, I was told by the official FAA DPRE I could seal the reserve and put it in service after I completed packing it, but according to the logic of some in this thread since I wasn't a rigger when I packed it, it couldn't possibly be legal.

I understand the reasons for the mixed views, but long standing practice does have weight with the FAA.

-- Jeff
My Skydiving History

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

>Maybe it's time for USPA to talk to Washington about issuing clarification or changing the Part 105 rule.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Wiser heads will warn you against pushing this question ... because you may not enjoy the FAA's second interpretation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


Heck, translate this to other industries where apprentices work under teachers. In medicine students start by watching a procedure, at sometime they start to help the teacher with the surgery, and by the end of their apprentice period they are supposed to be able to direct the whole operating room and be in command of the procedure, perhaps teaching the next generation, with their teacher stepping back and watching. (watch once, do once, teach once) If it works for my heart, then it seems a reserve...:P



Other industries don't have to deal with the FARs
Just remember the FAA motto"We're not happy till your not happy"
Replying to: Re: Stall On Jump Run Emergency Procedure? by billvon

If the plane is unrecoverable then exiting is a very very good idea.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0