0
blazetailman

Skydive Sacramento News Article: Official FAA Complaint

Recommended Posts

Some of you might know Skydive Sacramento has been dealing with airport access issues at Lincoln Regional Airport for the last 2 years.

We are in the middle of an official FAA complaint for the discriminating acts from airport management at a federally funded airport.

Here is the article.

http://www.sacbee.com/ourregion/story/2233416.htmlhttp://www.sacbee.com/ourregion/story/2233416.html


www.skydivesac.comhttp://www.skydivesac.com
www.canopyflightcenter.com
www.skydivesac.com
www.guanofreefly.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

17 years in the sport, years of coaching/organizing a few medals and 3 world records.

I finally felt ready to take the course and responsibility of students.



It OK he got wingsuit instructor rating over the phone and really never did anything with it except hook up a few friends.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hey yo,

I made that comment because out of the whole article JP found a caption to make a comment about me. This thread is not about me. As I read my post it now looks like bragging. Wish I could take it back.

If you want to talk about my qualifications or anything else, start another thread, tell me where it is so I know where NOT to go.

Vector Boy I hope that your comment is in reference to JP. I hold no wingsuit rating at this time.

Now back to the topic at hand. Please.

I think this is a about starting a biz, not just skydiving discrimination at a federally funded airport

Let's keep this on topic..
www.canopyflightcenter.com
www.skydivesac.com
www.guanofreefly.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I think this is a about starting a biz, not just skydiving discrimination at a federally funded airport



I guess I see it as more of the latter, and hope the FAA can straighten out the airport management and save the city council from following the him down this path.
----------------------------------------------
You're not as good as you think you are. Seriously.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
They (dz) already won a part 13 and the city still has the right to say NO, it's not a smart move on their part to do so and can only lead to another loss and cost them money for lawyers, but it's still their right to be retarded.

At a guess the airport manger has the full blessing of the city commission, till the lawyer bills show up and the FAA wins again and withholds the future funding and or asks for repayment of past funding should they remain retarded and keep their current stance......till that happends the airport manger will remain employed, afterwards most companies fire those who cost the company millions in lost funding, and with todays econo in the country as well as Cali, looks like thin ice ahead?

For a better review of many of the issues you can take a look at Know your rights - Federal Funded Airports and Access issues

you can't pay for kids schoolin' with love of skydiving! ~ Airtwardo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This particular airport manager was previously a manager at another airport where he tried in vain to have an existing DZ removed. Sounds like he's been shoveling the city commission a pile of BS.

One more thing the DZ in this article has going for them: there previously had been a DZ at this airport (60's-70's) and there are specific laws on the local books about DZ operations.

I think on this airport access issue, if the DZO can carry through the long legal battle, the DZ will prevail.
----------------------------------------------
You're not as good as you think you are. Seriously.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0