0
klingeme

When landing off the dropzone...

Recommended Posts

Quote

why not bring muffins or biscuits or cookies? Why the incessant clamoring in this thread to bring a drink that many people have lifelong problems dealing with?



why not bring flowers???:o:S.. or a fruit basket or a DunkinDonuts CArd Or a GAsoline card?????
orrr
orrr


or maybe... just a common sense bit of respect??/

i followed this here and at FB and asked whether the offending jumpers who started this whole conversation were DZ regulars. ( which i doubt) or rather outta town visitors who may have been in "vacation mode" carrying with that, some sorta sense that They were 'special' and everyone else , just dealing with their regular lives, i.e. the property owner(s),,,were not AS important.:|>:(.. Never got an answer..

either way..rudeness and arrogance have no place in the picture, when dealing with what basically amounts to tresspassing...

yeah yeah yeah.. a jumper HAS to choose an open area to land,, when they can't "get back".. but they should do so with a certain sense of humility and concern for the ground that they are " tramping around on " And should they encounter the rightful owner of that ground, care MUST be taken to make the meeting a positive one...for both parties...
it's easy
BCC
basic common courtesy..

i KNOW.. it's not in the S I M ( not that it SHOULD be ) ....maybe that's part of the problem.
Do some of us Need to be taught EVERYTHING???[:/]:( i hope not...

jt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

rudeness and arrogance have no place in the picture, when dealing with what basically amounts to tresspassing...



True enough.

And that goes both ways. The property owner needs to understand that the jumpers just want to leave with their gear, and that they aren't there to intentionally vandalize or destroy anything. Threatening to release a pit bull on them or threatening to shoot them is criminal assault. Actually releasing a pit bull attack on them is criminal battery. Actually shooting at them is attempted murder. Neither pit bulls nor guns are an appropriate response to jumpers who are forced to land on your property by no choice of their own, and who only want to leave. The excuse of "protecting my property" is invalid because the jumpers aren't there to do anything that requires a "protective" response - they're not there to steal or destroy. If they want to enforce their private property rights against trespassers, then call the sheriff and let them handle it.

Everyone wants to talk about the inappropriate response by the jumpers, but there was also an inappropriate response by the property owner. Put those two together, and someone could get hurt. So let's deal with both sides of the equation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

but there was also an inappropriate response by the property owner.



That comment was made to her friends only on facebook and only made public because Mark posted the facebook comments. You mean to say you've never said things in private to close friends about something you didn't expect to be made public?
you can't pay for kids schoolin' with love of skydiving! ~ Airtwardo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

why not bring muffins or biscuits or cookies? Why the incessant clamoring in this thread to bring a drink that many people have lifelong problems dealing with?



Mainly because beer is awesome, but if the off chance they don't drink beer I get points for making a nice gesture (it's the thought that counts right?) AND get to keep the beer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

What if they have a weight problem?:|



Well, he does have a point.
Muffins and cookies weigh less than a case of beer.
:D:D


My point was more along the lines of don't be "that guy", the one who has to always make the point that everyone doesn't drink.

It's like the stupid fuckers that come to an advertised country style pork rib bbq at the DZ and walks up to the grill with 200# of meat on it and ask me what I have for the vegetarian. Answer, NOT A FUCKING THING!! Oh wait, there is the baked beans..Ooops,threw some dead pig in there also.:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

but there was also an inappropriate response by the property owner.



That comment was made to her friends only on facebook and only made public because Mark posted the facebook comments.



It matters not - it was an inappropriate response on the property owner's part. Whether done privately or publicly, they were still wrong.

Imagine another load of skydivers with a bad spot lands on her property next month, and she lives up to her word and points a gun in their direction and shoots someone. That's wrong, and a criminal act. And when the District Attorney finds out she threatened to do it a month ago, that's premeditation and makes it even worse. The property owner is a fool for making such threats, and her proposed responses are not justified by the law.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[reply
It matters not - it was an inappropriate response on the property owner's part. Whether done privately or publicly, they were still wrong.

Imagine another load of skydivers with a bad spot lands on her property next month, and she lives up to her word and points a gun in their direction and shoots someone. That's wrong, and a criminal act. And when the District Attorney finds out she threatened to do it a month ago, that's premeditation and makes it even worse. The property owner is a fool for making such threats, and her proposed responses are not justified by the law.



Yes, all true and agreed.

The onus is on us to control what WE can control. WE simply need to do our part; be considerate of the owner's property as much as possible. Snide remarks back to any owner, regardless of provocation, is not smart and only perpetuates and worsens the problem. WE can control that part...and should.
My reality and yours are quite different.
I think we're all Bozos on this bus.
Falcon5232, SCS8170, SCSA353, POPS9398, DS239

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another scenario along this line...

A cutaway canopy or free-bag drift into a farmer’s corn field. Before tramping thru the corn, ask for permission from the landowner.

Tell them what you’re looking for and explain that you want to find it and carefully remove it from their field before their Combine finds it. “We’d hate to see any damage to your equipment because our/my equipment inadvertently drifted into your corn field”. Explain that you’ll be very careful not to damage any crops or scare any livestock. And again, bring beer! :D

Birdshit & Fools Productions

"Son, only two things fall from the sky."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Mainly because beer is awesome, but if the off chance they don't drink beer I get points for making a nice gesture (it's the thought that counts right?) AND get to keep the beer.



You are carded... can I see some ID please

(.)Y(.)
Chivalry is not dead; it only sleeps for want of work to do. - Jerome K Jerome

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well I have to disagree with you. The land owner is a lady for one and she is, well, very pleasing to the eyes. So here we have let's say 8 men and two chicks drop out of the sky and land on her private property.

So she engages them about their trespassing & scaring of the livestock and asks them to stop their deliberate and ongoing scaring of livestock because they were enjoying it and having a laugh. (in her mind that is what she saw)

She then gets an attitude and who knows what smart ass reaction flipped to her, she may have even had to say something like "if you stop now and leave, I'm going to have to take action" (that could have meant calling the cops or pushing them out the gate) One or two male smartass skydivers then make additional comments like "yea right what you going to do about it, there are more us then you". (perceived threat of harm)

We don't know, but had there been any feeling of a threat to her or her property, like fucking with the horses to the point one got hurt, well then she has a right to defend her person and the property, that even means letting loose the dogs and or pulling a firearm.

Come out to my house and fuck with me or my family and see what you'll be staring down, dogs to much of a pussy to release on you though, so have no worries of a bite...
you can't pay for kids schoolin' with love of skydiving! ~ Airtwardo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Mainly because beer is awesome, but if the off chance they don't drink beer I get points for making a nice gesture (it's the thought that counts right?) AND get to keep the beer.



You are carded... can I see some ID please



Born in 1975. You? Mayhap you don't truly understand the awesomeness that is beer? This should help, How Beer Saved the World:http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/how-beer-saved-the-world/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You are carded... can I see some ID please
------------------------------------------------------

Born in 1975. You? Mayhap you don't truly understand the awesomeness that is beer? This should help, How Beer Saved the World:http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/...eer-saved-the-world/
------------------------------------------------------------

:D[laugh)[/laugh] Oh I believe he knows of this awesomeness

You can't be drunk all day if you don't start early!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Well I have to disagree with you. The land owner is a lady for one and she is, well, very pleasing to the eyes. So here we have let's say 8 men and two chicks drop out of the sky and land on her private property.

So she engages them about their trespassing & scaring of the livestock and asks them to stop their deliberate and ongoing scaring of livestock because they were enjoying it and having a laugh. (in her mind that is what she saw)

She then gets an attitude and who knows what smart ass reaction flipped to her, she may have even had to say something like "if you stop now and leave, I'm going to have to take action" (that could have meant calling the cops or pushing them out the gate) One or two male smartass skydivers then make additional comments like "yea right what you going to do about it, there are more us then you". (perceived threat of harm)

We don't know, but had there been any feeling of a threat to her or her property, like fucking with the horses to the point one got hurt, well then she has a right to defend her person and the property, that even means letting loose the dogs and or pulling a firearm.



First of all, I'm playing devil's-advocate here, because no one has been representing the skydiver's side of the story, in the zeal to brand them the wrong-doers.

And none of us seems to know exactly what went on between the skydivers and the property owner, and you acknowledge that yourself.

Yet you continue on to invent some conversation to support your position, even though you don't know if such things were said. Yes, it's one possibility that the skydivers acted like assholes, but we don't know if it's true, and we shouldn't assume it is. The other possibility is that the property owner is an asshole, and while we shouldn't assume that either, we also shouldn't disregard outright that possibility either.

And you also acknowledge that her perception of things could be different from reality (i.e. "in her mind that is what she saw"). The jumpers may have just been laughing and joking with each other because of their predicament, or what happened on the dive, just like jumpers do on every dive after they get to the ground. And she may have perceived that as directed towards her, or of making light of spooking her horses. It could be that her perception is wrong.

I've seen unreasonable property owners before, as well as those which are very understanding. My encounters have ranged from an irate man running to his house to get a gun, to another friendly man running to his house to get his ATV to give me a ride around his land to help me find a cut-away canopy. I haven't heard anything definitively in this thread to convince me of which of those extremes this property owner belongs in, if any.

Until then, I'm not going to jump on the bandwagon to blame the skydivers, and only the skydivers.

Just the facts, please.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Just the facts, please.



7 jumpers (not 10): 6 guys, 1 chick. Senior jumper had less than 500, a couple jumpers had less than 100. Some (all?) not local.

Bad spot. The pilot asked the jumpers to get out early (at 10K) because winds were coming up. Low jumper experience level meant there were a lot of solos and small-ways, so jump run got strung out, too.

Small landing area, including power lines, trees, and houses.

6 jumpers landed in one direction; spooked horses gathered at the other end. The last jumper landed in the opposite direction, spooking the horses who thought they had found a safe spot.

Yes, there was some laughing, but not about spooking horses. More like low-time jumpers having survived an "emergency bail-out" and off-field landing in a confined area.

2 civilians, one angry/upset, the other not so much. The not-so-much one asked the jumpers to move slowly so as not to further alarm the horses. Jumpers complied.

Mark

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Thank you for those factual details, Mark. That doesn't sound nearly as bad as some here have made it out to be.

I recommend a fruit basket from a local grocery store as a means to mending whatever hurt feelings there might be with the property owner.



+1

Knew a bird hunter that had his secret hunting places with the farmers permision.

He always stopped by the farm house's with a box of candy for the lady of the bouse before going bang bang in the back forty.

He didn'y have to, it was a sign of respect:)
One Jump Wonder

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mick

I'm not a horse person.[:/] Don't have a clue what their into.

I'll try and be nice to their owner, and do the responsiable thing like offer to pay for vet bills fence damage etc.if it's my fault.

You know the deal act like a responsible adult instead of a wise ass.;)

R.I.P.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think it's important to stress that once you've done what you can safely to avoid inconveniencing the landowner, your priority as ever is to land under a level canopy in a space that permits it without impacting obstacles. If that space is a crop field or a pasture containing animals, then so be it.

I have a friend who found herself over the same horse paddock not once but twice within the space of a few weeks. The first time she landed within it and one of the horses bolted, damaging a gate (and presumably itself). The landowner was extremely upset and aggressive. The second time my friend was determined to avoid it at all costs, and broke her arm as a result. Could have been much worse.

Personally if I land off and the landowner is around, the first thing out of my mouth will be an apology. Why on earth wouldn't it be? It costs nothing, and regardless of the cause, you're on his or her land without permission.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0