Epstein Files

[nigel99 612]

Interesting turn of events in the Epstein files. Jon Stewart did a piece on how it’s biting Trump in the arse as he rose to power by feeding conspiracy theories and is struggling to put this back in a box. He also said Trump calling them “phoney” is a huge tell. 

Now Trump has gone on a rampage saying the Epstein files are fake and created by Hillary Clinton and Obama. 

As a side note, I do believe the extremely rich and powerful do get to the point where they justify extreme cruelty and illegal behaviour. One only has to look at the data on how many CEO’s are psychopaths etc. I’m not saying it’s all of them, and it’s definitely not along party lines. Look at Diddy and also the young women who are used as entertainment at sex parties in the Middle East (most recent news I saw a young woman was dumped with a broken spine and other bones). 

[billvon 3,107]

20 hours ago, nigel99 said:

Interesting turn of events in the Epstein files.

Indeed.  To see Trump say "ignore the Epstein files" is a rather remarkable shift, brought about no doubt by his inclusion in them.

Ironically, since he cannot read more than a few sentences, he has almost certainly not read the files himself.   He asked Bondi to confiscate and release them, hoping to embarrass some democrats.  Bondi then read them and had an "oh shit" moment, and so she stopped talking about it.  It's a good bet other people read them as well - specifically Miller and Musk.  Musk, of course, has already posted that Trump is on the list.

But yes, his sudden claim that we should all ignore them indicates that someone (Bondi?  Miller?) finally got to him and explained how bad it would be to release them.

[billvon 3,107]

Up next - "Epstein?  Who's that?"

[JoeWeber 2,932]

1 hour ago, billvon said:

Up next - "Epstein?  Who's that?"

Trump posted this Saturday on Truth Social:

"They created the Epstein Files, just like they created the FAKE Hillary Clinton/Christopher Steele Dossier that they used on me, and now my so-called 'friends' are playing right into their hands," Trump's post reads in part. "Why didn’t these Radical Left Lunatics release the Epstein Files? If there was ANYTHING in there that could have hurt the MAGA Movement, why didn’t they use it?"

Oh, he's in the file alright and it's just another Democrat plot.

[billvon 3,107]

Ghislaine Maxwell is now petitioning for her own release, basing her petition on the fact that Trump claimed there was no client list and therefore no basis for her imprisonment.  

And it might work - especially if Trump has to keep that list undercover at all costs.

[JoeWeber 2,932]

On 7/13/2025 at 2:13 PM, billvon said:

Indeed.  To see Trump say "ignore the Epstein files" is a rather remarkable shift, brought about no doubt by his inclusion in them.

Ironically, since he cannot read more than a few sentences, he has almost certainly not read the files himself.   He asked Bondi to confiscate and release them, hoping to embarrass some democrats.  Bondi then read them and had an "oh shit" moment, and so she stopped talking about it.  It's a good bet other people read them as well - specifically Miller and Musk.  Musk, of course, has already posted that Trump is on the list.

But yes, his sudden claim that we should all ignore them indicates that someone (Bondi?  Miller?) finally got to him and explained how bad it would be to release them.

"I can say that Pam Bondi, I really think that she's done very good," he protested. "She says, I gave you all the credible information and if she finds any more credible information, she'll give that to you. What more can she do than that?" -Trump

Is this credible information? Probably not. We definitely can't have reputations ruined by the careless dissemination of information not deemed credible by the Department of Credibility, that's for sure.

[normiss 891]

40 minutes ago, JoeWeber said:

"I can say that Pam Bondi, I really think that she's done very good," he protested. "She says, I gave you all the credible information and if she finds any more credible information, she'll give that to you. What more can she do than that?" -Trump

Is this credible information? Probably not. We definitely can't have reputations ruined by the careless dissemination of information not deemed credible by the Department of Credibility, that's for sure.

It's not like there's any evidence of Trump's sex crimes....ever with Google:

Trump is a rapist search results

[billvon 3,107]

He's finally tackling the root of the problem:

[billvon 3,107]

So the DOJ just fired the prosecutor who put Epstein and Maxwell behind bars.

Trump's revenge continues against people who hurt his friends.

[JoeWeber 2,932]

Just now, billvon said:

So the DOJ just fired the prosecutor who put Epstein and Maxwell behind bars.

Trump's revenge continues against people who hurt his friends.

I reckon the daughter of James Comey was toast from the beginning.