Kamala Harris critics corner

[brenthutch 444]

Joe Biden 2.0 

 

[Phil1111 1,176]

mmmm.......mmmm, Ok got nothing.

[winsor 236]

2 hours ago, brenthutch said:

Joe Biden 2.0 

 

I have worked with women who went below the radar by playing the airhead Barbie doll type, but actually had minds like steel traps.  I get no sense that Harris is pretending to be a moron - her track record makes clear that what you see is what you get.

Her opponent is beneath contempt by any measure, but she is just as bad when all is said and done.

The US of A is an adolescent society as empires go, so it's useful to consider what kind of ghastly "leadership" has been survivable historically.

The policies supported by Harris have been the kiss of death to every nation that has put them in practice.

On the other hand you have a sociopathic candidate driven solely by greed and self interest, and it is thus possible that he will avoid killing the goose that laid the golden egg.  With Harris our goose is cooked

Either way, this election goes beyond 'hold your nose and vote,' it is one of having barf bags available at the voting booths.

 

BSBD,  Winsor

[gowlerk 2,275]

50 minutes ago, winsor said:

The policies supported by Harris have been the kiss of death to every nation that has put them in practice.

This would be a fun one to ask you to back up with examples. You rhetoric is becoming quite florid.

[brenthutch 444]

17 minutes ago, gowlerk said:

This would be a fun one to ask you to back up with examples. You rhetoric is becoming quite florid.

 

How about this

 

 

[JoeWeber 2,938]

1 hour ago, winsor said:

Her opponent is beneath contempt by any measure, but she is just as bad when all is said and done.

 

This is bullshit by any measure. 

[JoeWeber 2,938]

4 hours ago, brenthutch said:

Joe Biden 2.0 

 

Go for it, Brent. Our excitement around Harris is that she seems poised to defeat Trump, no more. Apparently that does not please you, your contrived protests not withstanding.

[brenthutch 444]

11 minutes ago, JoeWeber said:

Go for it, Brent. Our excitement around Harris is that she seems poised to defeat Trump, no more. Apparently that does not please you, your contrived protests not withstanding.

From what I just saw, she is tied (within the margin of error) in the states that matter. Just wait until the sugar high wears off and she is forced into a press conference. Your only hope to keep Trump from a second term, is Trump, not Kamala.

[JoeWeber 2,938]

Just now, brenthutch said:

From what I just saw, she is tied (within the margin of error) in the states that matter. Just wait until the sugar high wears off and she is forced into a press conference. Your only hope to keep Trump from a second term, is Trump, not Kamala.

And you had the audacity to tell Kallend he was just an angry man screaming? When Harris wins you can attribute it to your binary analysis for the day. I'll just be happy that Trump lost.

[brenthutch 444]

21 minutes ago, JoeWeber said:

And you had the audacity to tell Kallend he was just an angry man screaming? When Harris wins you can attribute it to your binary analysis for the day. I'll just be happy that Trump lost.

I said no such thing. I just find it bizarre that a man of science posts anecdotes of bad weather and suggests it is due to climate change when he should know better.

[JoeWeber 2,938]

2 minutes ago, brenthutch said:

I said no such thing. I just find it bizarre that a man of science posts anecdotes of bad weather and suggests it is due to climate change when he should know better.

Post #666 in the Replace Biden thread. I'm calling it a decent paraphrase.

[JerryBaumchen 1,466]

2 hours ago, winsor said:

I have worked with women who went below the radar by playing the airhead Barbie doll type, but actually had minds like steel traps.  I get no sense that Harris is pretending to be a moron - her track record makes clear that what you see is what you get.

Her opponent is beneath contempt by any measure, but she is just as bad when all is said and done.

The US of A is an adolescent society as empires go, so it's useful to consider what kind of ghastly "leadership" has been survivable historically.

The policies supported by Harris have been the kiss of death to every nation that has put them in practice.

On the other hand you have a sociopathic candidate driven solely by greed and self interest, and it is thus possible that he will avoid killing the goose that laid the golden egg.  With Harris our goose is cooked

Either way, this election goes beyond 'hold your nose and vote,' it is one of having barf bags available at the voting booths.

 

BSBD,  Winsor

Hi Winsor,

Do you ever see the good in anything?

Jerry Baumchen

[brenthutch 444]

1 minute ago, JoeWeber said:

Post #666 in the Replace Biden thread. I'm calling it a decent paraphrase.

In response to his name calling. You would think he could do better than a school yard taunt.

[jakee 1,594]

1 hour ago, brenthutch said:

How about this

 

And that's what you think a policy is, yeah? 

Is that more silly or less silly than saying cloud storage isn't a physical place?

Edited August 17, 2024 by jakee

[jakee 1,594]

2 hours ago, winsor said:

Her opponent is beneath contempt by any measure, but she is just as bad when all is said and done.

You said the same about Clinton, and just like now you never explained why.

2 hours ago, winsor said:

The policies supported by Harris have been the kiss of death to every nation that has put them in practice.

What policies?

2 hours ago, winsor said:

On the other hand you have a sociopathic candidate driven solely by greed and self interest, and it is thus possible that he will avoid killing the goose that laid the golden egg.  With Harris our goose is cooked

I bet you thought the same about Bill Clinton. I bet you thought the same about Obama. I bet you thought the same about Biden. It's one slow cooker you're working with.

[brenthutch 444]

5 minutes ago, jakee said:

And that's what you think a policy is, yeah? 

Is that more silly or less silly than saying cloud storage isn't a physical place?

She can’t even read a teleprompter 

 

[jakee 1,594]

2 minutes ago, brenthutch said:

She can’t even read a teleprompter 

And apparently you can't even read a post. A bit rich to throw stones from that glass house, isn't it?

Edited August 17, 2024 by jakee

[winsor 236]

18 minutes ago, JerryBaumchen said:

Hi Winsor,

Do you ever see the good in anything?

Jerry Baumchen

Sure, but when negotiating a minefield my focus is not the lovely flowers therein.

[brenthutch 444]

“OTB found that Harris’s (92%) numbers are far worse than Trump or even Biden. Using the same whole staff methodology, the Trump turnover was 72%; Biden was 77%. 

Lat year in October 2023, the Atlantic magazine called her office management “top-to-bottom dysfunction.” Previously, Axios had reported that staffers exited driven by “burnout and apprehension to being labeled a ‘Harris person.’

Andrzejewski says Harris’s office seems to be an abject chaos with no loyalty.

“If a small business had a high turnover rate of 92%, you would either say, there was something wrong with the employees, here it looks like something wrong with the person (Harris) in charge.””

https://floridadaily.com/vp-kamala-harris-staff-had-a-92-turnover-rate/

And She is supposed to bring everyone together?

[kallend 2,147]

2 hours ago, JoeWeber said:

And you had the audacity to tell Kallend he was just an angry man screaming? When Harris wins you can attribute it to your binary analysis for the day. I'll just be happy that Trump lost.

He did?  He's on my ignore list so I only see the trollish garbage he writes if someone quotes it.

[Phil1111 1,176]

1 hour ago, brenthutch said:

She can’t even read a teleprompter 

 

As compared to trump who can't read.

1 hour ago, brenthutch said:

 

“OTB found that Harris’s (92%) numbers are far worse than Trump or even Biden. Using the same whole staff methodology, the Trump turnover was 72%; Biden was 77%. 

Lat year in October 2023, the Atlantic magazine called her office management “top-to-bottom dysfunction.” Previously, Axios had reported that staffers exited driven by “burnout and apprehension to being labeled a ‘Harris person.’

Andrzejewski says Harris’s office seems to be an abject chaos with no loyalty.

“If a small business had a high turnover rate of 92%, you would either say, there was something wrong with the employees, here it looks like something wrong with the person (Harris) in charge.””

https://floridadaily.com/vp-kamala-harris-staff-had-a-92-turnover-rate/

And She is supposed to bring everyone together?

trump had a higher turnover than any single term president ever.

"And 31 percent of those White House "A-Team" jobs have turned over more than once, the study by the Brookings Institution shows.

"It's historic, it's unprecedented, it's off the charts," the study's author, Kathryn Dunn Tenpas, told NBC News. "I've never seen this kind of turnover before."

In just 32 months, President Donald Trump's rate of change has surpassed "all of his predecessors who served four-year terms," she said."

[winsor 236]

3 minutes ago, kallend said:

He did?  He's on my ignore list so I only see the trollish garbage he writes if someone quotes it.

The Deadpool Wolverine movie has a great bit about quote veracity.

Having a 14 year old pick the film adds variety, but many of the gags he didn't get.

[obelixtim 150]

4 hours ago, gowlerk said:

This would be a fun one to ask you to back up with examples. You rhetoric is becoming quite florid.

Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, Germany, France, the UK, Australia, NZ, Japan...are a few examples of countries that have failed with those socialist policies.... 

Hang on.....

[Phil1111 1,176]

50 minutes ago, obelixtim said:

Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, Germany, France, the UK, Australia, NZ, Japan...are a few examples of countries that have failed with those socialist policies.... 

Hang on.....

Just what I was thinking and those same countries have less drug problems, homelessness, education systems, etc, etc.

But the US has AR-15s, trump, declining life expectancy, higher prison populations,oh! the latest USSC approval of political corruption and bribing of politicians. Merica, four more years of trump and all the wasteful spending on elections won't be necessary anymore. No more elections, what a concept.

[brenthutch 444]

2 hours ago, obelixtim said:

Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, Germany, France, the UK, Australia, NZ, Japan...are a few examples of countries that have failed with those socialist policies.... 

Hang on.....

Funny how none of those countries are socialist 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_socialist_states

Even funnier when you look at the countries that are.

Edited August 17, 2024 by brenthutch