Trump

[Phil1111 1,189]

3 hours ago, kallend said:

Irony score 100%

"Trump administration to more heavily scrutinize "good moral character" requirement for U.S. citizenship"

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-administration-uscis-ctizenship-good-moral-character-scrutinize/

So republicans can pack the newly redistricted areas with loyalists.

Its time for dems to admit that they have been owned.

[BIGUN 1,497]

9 hours ago, Phil1111 said:

Its time for dems to admit that they have been owned.

Meanwhile in bloody old England - they revised/enhanced their good moral character definition (GMC) back in February.

[kallend 2,166]

18 hours ago, BIGUN said:

Meanwhile in bloody old England - they revised/enhanced their good moral character definition (GMC) back in February.

Clearly Trump need not apply.  He's disqualified on several counts.

[kallend 2,166]

Dementia?

 

 

[dogyks 16]

20 hours ago, kallend said:

Dementia?

 

 

Nah, you're trying to decipher the "Mr. Ed Syndrome."

A Stable Genius™ follows different logical rules.  He's so clever even he can't figure it out.

[wmw999 2,595]

2 hours ago, dogyks said:

Nah, you're trying to decipher the "Mr. Ed Syndrome."

A Stable Genius™ follows different logical rules.  He's so clever even he can't figure it out.

But still better than a female who cackles. Well, not entirely fair — I’m sure a cackling Republican would have been OK, with endless faults  

Wendy P. 

[dogyks 16]

30 minutes ago, wmw999 said:

But still better than a female who cackles. Well, not entirely fair — I’m sure a cackling Republican would have been OK, with endless faults  

Wendy P. 

We are in the awkward position in which Germany found itself sometime back where, distasteful as the candidate might be, the alternative is distinctly worse.

And no, cackling isn't a factor.

Being horrified by the left doesn't make one a supporter of Trump.  Viewing Trump as being characteristic of the right appears to give a pass to anything flaws of the left in some circles.

To be clear, the fact that Trump is a scumbag does not make the raw stupidity espoused by the left the slightest bit less odious.

To stifle one's gag reflex in opposition to Trump I get.  To actually SUPPORT the likes of Harris is suggestive of something between denial and idiocy.

[kallend 2,166]

I'd vote for this guy before I'd vote for Trump:

[JoeWeber 2,963]

Just now, dogyks said:

We are in the awkward position in which Germany found itself sometime back where, distasteful as the candidate might be, the alternative is distinctly worse.

And no, cackling isn't a factor.

Being horrified by the left doesn't make one a supporter of Trump.  Viewing Trump as being characteristic of the right appears to give a pass to anything flaws of the left in some circles.

To be clear, the fact that Trump is a scumbag does not make the raw stupidity espoused by the left the slightest bit less odious.

To stifle one's gag reflex in opposition to Trump I get.  To actually SUPPORT the likes of Harris is suggestive of something between denial and idiocy.

That all depends on what horrifies a person. My own SUPPORT, and vote, for Harris was a vote against the damage any sane person could plainly see coming from another Trump Presidency.  I'll wager (for realsie not Canadian style) that most Harris voters were more on that spectrum than any belief that she would be an amazing CIC. I do believe that cackling was a factor in the sense that it was a convenient glue used to bind together a list of shallow beliefs and outright prejudices too many voters used to justify holding their noses and voting Trump.

[BIGUN 1,497]

31 minutes ago, JoeWeber said:

That all depends on what horrifies a person.

Do you think the Democrats are going to reform in order to beat the next Republican candidate?

[normiss 901]

29 minutes ago, JoeWeber said:

That all depends on what horrifies a person. My own SUPPORT, and vote, for Harris was a vote against the damage any sane person could plainly see coming from another Trump Presidency.  I'll wager (for realsie not Canadian style) that most Harris voters were more on that spectrum than any belief that she would be an amazing CIC. I do believe that cackling was a factor in the sense that it was a convenient glue used to bind together a list of shallow beliefs and outright prejudices too many voters used to justify holding their noses and voting Trump.

I'd vote for Kamala the rest of my life over a pedophile rapist felon traitor insurrectionist lying cheating fraud thief traitor coward possibly espionage for ANY position. 

A dead President would be safer than The Great Pedo.

[gowlerk 2,281]

2 hours ago, dogyks said:

Being horrified by the left doesn't make one a supporter of Trump. 

Why are right wing people so frightened by change? 

[billvon 3,121]

 

2 hours ago, dogyks said:

We are in the awkward position in which Germany found itself sometime back where, distasteful as the candidate might be, the alternative is distinctly worse.

Indeed.  And it is a certainty that, back then, there were good patriotic Germans saying "well, Hitler might make some cruel speeches, and break a few eggs, but thank God we don't have Hindenberg any more!  That guy was ancient and incompetent.  And have you heard his laugh?"

[dogyks 16]

1 hour ago, normiss said:

I'd vote for Kamala the rest of my life over a pedophile rapist felon traitor insurrectionist lying cheating fraud thief traitor coward possibly espionage for ANY position. 

A dead President would be safer than The Great Pedo.

I do recall campaigning for Teddy Roosevelt.

[Phil1111 1,189]

2 hours ago, BIGUN said:

Do you think the Democrats are going to reform in order to beat the next Republican candidate?

Do you think thats necessary given the current direction of the state?

[BIGUN 1,497]

30 minutes ago, Phil1111 said:

Do you think thats necessary given the current direction of the state?

Extremely necessary,

[nigel99 634]

1 hour ago, BIGUN said:

Extremely necessary,

I wonder if anyone ever told him that the definition of a museum is “collection of artefacts of historical interest”.

Babbling fool wants museums to be about the future, and it’s interesting how acknowledging slavery as bad gets under his skin.

[JoeWeber 2,963]

5 hours ago, BIGUN said:

Do you think the Democrats are going to reform in order to beat the next Republican candidate?

No. We have too many if not now when types.

[gowlerk 2,281]

3 minutes ago, JoeWeber said:

No. We have too many if not now when types.

Newsom is trying a re-brand. As a slippery slick pol who will do whatever it takes. Probably he is ruthless enough.

[JoeWeber 2,963]

Just now, gowlerk said:

Newsom is trying a re-brand. As a slippery slick pol who will do whatever it takes. Probably he is ruthless enough.

And it may work to sway some but not those who will be put off by our newly formed Coalition for Transgender Studies in Grade School. 

[Phil1111 1,189]

2 hours ago, nigel99 said:

I wonder if anyone ever told him that the definition of a museum is “collection of artefacts of historical interest”.

Babbling fool wants museums to be about the future, and it’s interesting how acknowledging slavery as bad gets under his skin.

Trump's next action is to cut funding for the Smithsonian until they purge their leftist WOKE crimes. Like having any exhibits about slavery. Any mention that any nations besides the US won WW1, WW2 are purged and that the US didn't win the Vietnam war. When the Smithsonian and other museums put up exhibits that Native Americans were not true Americans until they were enlightened by Jebus and white settlers. 

Then comes education textbooks in schools history textbooks, science, etc.

[JerryBaumchen 1,471]

27 minutes ago, Phil1111 said:

Trump's next action is to cut funding for the Smithsonian until they purge their leftist WOKE crimes. Like having any exhibits about slavery. Any mention that any nations besides the US won WW1, WW2 are purged and that the US didn't win the Vietnam war. When the Smithsonian and other museums put up exhibits that Native Americans were not true Americans until they were enlightened by Jebus and white settlers. 

Then comes education textbooks in schools history textbooks, science, etc.

Hi Phi,

All with the prologue that Trump is the greatest Prez ever.

Jerry Baumchen

[dogyks 16]

I think a good historian, like a good scientist, is inherently a skeptic.  The orthodox view of events as seen through any lens is generally skewed.

An example is the Tuskegee Airmen.  Were they subjected to shameless racism?  Uh, yeah.  Was that good or bad?  Kinda depends on who you ask.

The average pilot sent into combat went through training and was turned loose with very few hours under their belt.  They generally did not fare well.

Because of the reluctance of the War Department to send negro pilots into combat, they were left to train much longer than would otherwise have been the case.  Their effectiveness reflected their sharpened skills.

Like in 'Band of Brothers,' where it was noted that Captain Mandel's cruelty in training likely reduced their losses in combat, by being assholes the War Department resulted in more of the Tuskegee Airmen making it home.

My point is that our understanding of history should be enhanced, rather than focused on one perspective or another.

[murps2000 87]

40 minutes ago, dogyks said:

I think a good historian, like a good scientist, is inherently a skeptic.  The orthodox view of events as seen through any lens is generally skewed.

An example is the Tuskegee Airmen.  Were they subjected to shameless racism?  Uh, yeah.  Was that good or bad?  Kinda depends on who you ask.

The average pilot sent into combat went through training and was turned loose with very few hours under their belt.  They generally did not fare well.

Because of the reluctance of the War Department to send negro pilots into combat, they were left to train much longer than would otherwise have been the case.  Their effectiveness reflected their sharpened skills.

Like in 'Band of Brothers,' where it was noted that Captain Mandel's cruelty in training likely reduced their losses in combat, by being assholes the War Department resulted in more of the Tuskegee Airmen making it home.

My point is that our understanding of history should be enhanced, rather than focused on one perspective or another.

They probably also chose to train them as fighter pilots because they couldn’t retrofit bombers to have separate relief tubes for colored folk.

[jakee 1,601]

14 hours ago, dogyks said:

And no, cackling isn't a factor.

And yet again (again again again), you’ve never once stated a single thing that is a factor. 
 

But hey, we know you love posting exceptionally racist stuff, so it’s a fair bet that misogyny isn’t far behind. Of course despite your protestations you might just really love Trump - which would make sense given he’s a racist misogynist.