Model's Propeller Accident

[rehmwa 2]

Quote

>And the best way to make sure it happens to you is to tell yourself it can't.

I really doubt that, just because Squeak wants to use another word for the problem, implies that this equates to ignoring the possibility.

The take away is that not pulling (for whatever reason and rare as it is) CAN happen to anyone and acknowledging that helps reduce the possibility for everyone.

...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

[Squeak 17]

They didnt FORGET. They were neglgent.

Why am I being pedantic about this.
Here's why.
Some may say (like Bill Novak) that's it's just a play one words. It's not.
To accept that the forgot to do the SINGLE MOST IMPORTANT THING in sky diving, is to make excuses for being negligent.

No one FORGETS to pull, you don't pull ON TIME because YOU FUCKED UP not because you "forgot".

I have gone low on an early sit jump, I didnt forget to pull I FUCKED UP, by not being aware of my altitude.

Take responsibility for your actions and don't look for lame arsed excuses for why things go bad.

If there is seriously anyone jumping who thinks that they are capable of "FORGETTING " to pull they should never put a rig on their back





In a text based media such as this the selection of appropriate words is very important for proper and correct communication of ideas.

You are not now, nor will you ever be, good enough to not die in this sport (Sparky)
My Life ROCKS!
How's yours doing?

[rehmwa 2]

Quote

Why am I being pedantic about this.

because it's important to you - you infer a certain amount of excuse making in the term 'forget' and won't accept the implication of diverting responsibility to take the right action

- other people might not make that inference like you do and just use the term as a descriptor or even one they find drives acceptance as a root cause needing ownership also

that's why is understandable that it's semantics for people like me but very important to you

actually - I had thought that Billvon was the one that making inferences based on verbage, not you. I got that backwards.

It's funny, some of the biggest arguments I've ever seen is when two people are clearly on the same page (agreeing) for what is happening and they can't recognize that they are agreeing with each other but just refuse to unless they use the same exact verbage. Usually engineers and technical types. I've seen arguments between grown ups over the use of the phrase "cut in" vs "implement" when both were just talking about making the same change in a product.

thanks for caring - your motivation is understandable and caring for all the youngsters out there - I understand what you're trying to say, but trying to force others to use your specific phrasing is only useful when trying to succeed in getting promotions to executive level in engineering companies

...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

[wmw999 2,550]

Quote

trying to force others to use your specific phrasing is only useful when trying to succeed in getting promotions to executive level in engineering companies

And that's why we have PowerPoint
Wendy P.

There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown)

[rehmwa 2]

Quote

Quote

trying to force others to use your specific phrasing is only useful when trying to succeed in getting promotions to executive level in engineering companies

And that's why we have PowerPoint
Wendy P.

that's hilarious - I've prepared presos to present to "Vice President Bob". At the end, I've had the comment - "that was great, can you change the words on slide 5 to 'blah blah blah' instead of 'original text'?"

It's silly, because he was the final audience, no point in making revisions, especially just for his personal verbage.

Clarity verbage. It = delivery and listening/reading/context skills.
I find that clarity depends a LOT more on the listener than the deliverer.

...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

[wmw999 2,550]

Way off topic, but I actually took a class on presenting material once that was really eye-opening. It improved my presentations hugely, and I've used it to help others.

Look up Edward Tufte. Worth it. He's all about "don't lead them to the conclusion, show them the data and let them participate in the conclusion"

Wendy P.

There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown)

[Squeak 17]

I whole heartedly disagree.
Language and word use specifically (particularly in a medium which is text based, but also when that media is cross cultural)) should be properly defined and when instruction (like in topic specific forums) or information is to be disseminated.

If you give people a "soft" option for why things went awry it excuses there poor decision making or improper judgment. Call things out for what they are, dont glamourise it, dont gloss over it.

This whole back and forth came about because of the way words were being used to excuse behaviours of people who put themselves in harms way. Initially a model walking into the spinning propeller. It then transgressed to jumpers not being "heads up" and "forgetting" the most fundamental thing in our sport. These are not valid reasons for why bad things happened, they're "cop outs".

IF the "safety and Training" sub forum is to have any real validity then it should at the least be the place where excuses are not tolerated.

You are not now, nor will you ever be, good enough to not die in this sport (Sparky)
My Life ROCKS!
How's yours doing?

[wmw999 2,550]

RWRATP -- real writers rewrite around the problem.

the solution for going forward is to make sure that in teaching one's students, one gives enough context to the words so that the concepts follow naturally. If there's a disagreement about the connotation and/or denotation of the word "forget" then it's not the best word to use when describing the problem, simply because it is prone to misunderstanding.

It's why technical language is as specific as it is -- simply to avoid misunderstandings such as this one.

Wendy P.

There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown)

[SethInMI 174]

But Squeak,

You can't use "I fucked up" as a complete explanation for a cypres fire. Here are some sample answers to "why did you have a cypres fire":

John Doe : "I fucked up. I jumped up on exit, hit the tail, and woke up under canopy"
Jane Doe : "I fucked up. I stuffed my PC too deep in the pouch, and spent 15 sec trying to dig it out"
Jack Doe : "I fucked up. I lost altitude awareness; I forgot to pull."

In general, saying "I forgot..." does not in any way absolve me of responsibility, but it does explain what happened.

Here in the USA anyway, "I forgot" is a common equivalent for "I lost track of time", as in "oh shit, I forgot to pick up my daughter" after losing track of time while watching a football match.

It's flare not flair, brakes not breaks, bridle not bridal, "could NOT care less" not "could care less".

[rehmwa 2]

it's such a blatant common sense topic, that this really is silly though

semantics jockeys are likely the reason that we have warning lables on toothpick boxes

"did not pull" is the only accurate statement - everything else is someone's interpretation on the reason why - so I don't much care, the solution is to pull

...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

[toolbox 0]

The point is that forgetting to pull because you are buzy having fun is unacceptable behavior.
Forgetting to pull is just stupid.
I'm glad most people have AAD's these days..
Forgetting to pull is more stupid than walking into a spinning prop.

[SethInMI 174]

Yeah it is silly, as we are all basically on the same page.

For some one who is interested in being precise in language, I think you can make a distinction between omitting a step while planning out a process, and losing track of time and not taking an action when you should.

It is not like any jumper mentally planning a dive flow "forgets" the pull step and expects to go directly from breakoff and track to check canopy/collapse slider, but after 60 sec or so from exit their minds don't remind them.

It is a convention to use the phrase "forgetting" for both accidentally omitting a planning step and missing a timing cue, even though cognitively they feel to me quite different.

But again, just semantics, IMHO.

It's flare not flair, brakes not breaks, bridle not bridal, "could NOT care less" not "could care less".

[rehmwa 2]

Quote

The point is that forgetting to pull because you are buzy having fun is unacceptable behavior.
Forgetting to pull is just stupid.
I'm glad most people have AAD's these days..
Forgetting to pull is more stupid than walking into a spinning prop.

my eyes teared up a bit with that post - trying not to laugh too loud

thanks

...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

[billvon 3,080]

>The point is that forgetting to pull because you are buzy having fun is
>unacceptable behavior.

Agreed. And forgetting to pull even if you are doing something that you think is important (like trying to get stable) is also unacceptable.

[toolbox 0]

Right

[toolbox 0]

right.

[JasonYergin 0]

I feel terrible for this girl. I really hope she recovers and goes on to do great things.

_________________________________

...Don't Get Elimated!!

[toolbox 0]

Yep! She has shit sandwich on her plate.
I also hope she recovers,but without any settlements from lawsuits.
She served up her own sandwich and now she has to choke it down on her own.
At least she is still alive.

[lawrocket 3]

Quote

So it is not stupid if a genius walks into a spinning prop?

The gal was not stupid. She was ignorant. Even as a student pilot, the prop stopped before anyone got in or out of the plane. She made an ignorant mistake.

The pilot was in command. He was responsible for her safety. He let her out with the prop spinning. To me that's inexcuseable. She fucked up. He let her. She was not fully aware of a risk about which he was cognizant and he did not manage it.

My wife is hotter than your wife.

[nigel99 574]

Quote

>I "heads up" persons would think twice about walking towards the business
>end of a plane. This was NOT a "heads up" person.

And a heads up person would never forget to pull. And a heads up person would never pull the wrong handle under stress. But still, they sometimes do.

By definition you are not 'heads up' if you do something that stupid. You may be experienced, even someone who is conservative and cautious, but that does not make you heads up.

Complacency kills and ANY skydiver who has died or had a cypress fire while waiting for the beep is not heads up, they are either incompetent or complacent.

As far as the model goes, I wouldn't blame a person unfamiliar with aircraft for a screw up like that. People mentioned earlier in the thread about static line students being different to a tandem student. A tandem student may have been on a small airport or dropzone for 30 minutes before boarding, a SL student should have had considerably more exposure. I think the same is true for passenger joy rides. Most passengers are ignorant thereby placing them into the incompetent bracket. The pilot should take responsibility for their safety.

Experienced jumper - someone who has made mistakes more often than I have and lived.

[Krip 2]

Quote

Quote

So it is not stupid if a genius walks into a spinning prop?

The gal was not stupid. She was ignorant. Even as a student pilot, the prop stopped before anyone got in or out of the plane. She made an ignorant mistake.

The pilot was in command. He was responsible for her safety. He let her out with the prop spinning. To me that's inexcuseable. She fucked up. He let her. She was not fully aware of a risk about which he was cognizant and he did not manage it.

I agree with rocket.

What did the pilot have to gain by not shutting down before he let the PAX exit. A little time, less wear and tear on the starter and battery.

What did he have to lose by not shutting down ,a lot of sleepless nights.

IMO The Risk wasn't worth the rewards.

R.

[billvon 3,080]

>What did the pilot have to gain by not shutting down before he let the PAX
>exit. A little time, less wear and tear on the starter and battery. What did
>he have to lose by not shutting down ,a lot of sleepless nights.

Agreed. But keep in mind that all those things apply to skydivers - and we've had skydivers struck by props - and we still load hot.

[JasonYergin 0]

It should go without saying that you never approach the aircraft near the prop.

I say it should but it doesn't because it isn't drilled into people often enough.

I think from now on I will call people out no matter how much experience they have and of course they can choose to listen to me or be arrogant and say or do whatever they gotta do. Consistency with approaching the aircraft is the only way to go though because short of saving someones life or limb it's just never worth the extra 4 seconds you'd save by shortcutting it. Doing the right thing and setting a good example is the responsibility of everyone on the airfield.

_________________________________

...Don't Get Elimated!!

[obelixtim 150]

Quote

I say it should but it doesn't because it isn't drilled into people often enough.

Its standard at our DZ to tell everyone about the dangers of props....except we don't cal it a prop.

Its called a "mincer".....and people really GET that.

My computer beat me at chess, It was no match for me at kickboxing....

[airtwardo 7]

Quote

Quote

I say it should but it doesn't because it isn't drilled into people often enough.

Its standard at our DZ to tell everyone about the dangers of props....except we don't cal it a prop.

Its called a "mincer".....and people really GET that.

Having been a safety guy at an industrial manufacturing place I take it a step further and warn people about walking behind the blowin' spinner without eye protection.

~ If you choke a Smurf, what color does it turn? ~