0
coolskydiverguy

safe reserve wing loading

Recommended Posts

JeffCa


I intend to survive an unconscious scenario. My reserve is a 0.8 wingloading



Good on you for stacking the odds in your favor, but don't kid yourself that you're doing anything more than that.

I tell my family and friends who ask about AADs, and what they do for me, that "It takes me from a guarantee of death to a possibility of survival."
"There is only one basic human right, the right to do as you damn well please. And with it comes the only basic human duty, the duty to take the consequences." -P.J. O'Rourke

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
JohnMitchell

Another good reason to pull for you friends if you find them unconscious in freefall. :)



Which we know you've done before (and not just for your AFF students). ;) Definitely gives more opportunity for a possible good outcome rather than hoping for line stretch in enough time.
"There is only one basic human right, the right to do as you damn well please. And with it comes the only basic human duty, the duty to take the consequences." -P.J. O'Rourke

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
AADs also make work simpler for the coroner. If they find an intact corpse laying beside a open reserve, the investigation and autopsy are much easier.
In recent years, there have been a couple of a fatalities where skydivers died of heart attacks in free fall and their ADDs saved neat corpses.

IOW if the deceased lands under a fully-inflated reserve, far less "screaming and shouting and running abouting" interferes with your buddies enjoying an afternoon of skydiving,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
0.8

Aviator (pilot emergency parachutes) are factory-set at roughly half-brakes. Pulling down on a steering toggle results in 3/4 brakes. Flaring an Aviator slows your rate of descent a bit. The main advantage (to flaring an Aviator) is reducing forward speed.
Few pilots have enough muscle to stall an Aviator.
Even no flare landings (Aviator 280) are softer than MIL SPEC rounds because of the ANGLE of arrival. If you land an Aviator 280 no-flare, hands-off, down-wind, in the desert weeds surrounding Lake Elsinore, you easily slide off the excess forward speed. The key word here is FORWARD speed, because the angle of impact makes a huge difference. Human beings are pretty good at absorbing forward impacts, but ask any old para-trooper how much he enjoyed PLFs to the rear!!!
Expect a long string of profanity!!!
Haha!
Haha!
During the 1980s I was a static-line jump-master while the skydiving industry transitioned from rounds to squares. I accredit the vast reduction in student injuries to the change in ANGLE of arrival.

If anyone wonders where I got my opinions about Aviator 280 canopies ???? I evolved those opinions while jumping prototypes during the "live" phase of the TSO drop tests.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This idea is too weird to actually go any where, but... If I was going to dump somebody out under a canopy to be delivered like a limp sack of potato's knowing that they were going to be unconscious I think I'd use a modified round but I'd hook it up at ninety deg. so that it would be driving to their left. So realizing that I can't control the wind or direction I'd give them the best chance of having sidewise motion rather then forwards. I'd rather roll out on my side then on my knees and face. I know. It's too weird.

Lee
Lee
lee@velocitysportswear.com
www.velocitysportswear.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
riggerrob

Can we agree that side-ways PLFs produce the fewest I injuries?
.... Forwards PLFs scrape more knees and hands.
Rearward PLFs are the worst because of spinal compression and whacking the back of your head.




I had my TriCon in backwards, the canopy would facing into the wind but I could see where I was actually going. ;)










~ If you choke a Smurf, what color does it turn? ~

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>Can we agree that side-ways PLFs produce the fewest I injuries?

Yes, and I would add that if you can turn a "forward PLF" into a sideways one you are much better off; indeed all good PLF's have a side component, and the more of that the better. Too many people do the "feet knees face" version of PLF because they don't add any sidewards motion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
billvon

>Can we agree that side-ways PLFs produce the fewest I injuries?

Yes, and I would add that if you can turn a "forward PLF" into a sideways one you are much better off; indeed all good PLF's have a side component, and the more of that the better. Too many people do the "feet knees face" version of PLF because they don't add any sidewards motion.



Agreed. Even a rear PLF has a side component to it.
Nobody has time to listen; because they're desperately chasing the need of being heard.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0