0
brenthutch

They’re Back

Recommended Posts

“we expect U.S. fossil fuel production to continue rising in both 2022 and 2023, surpassing production in 2019, to reach a new record in 2023.”

https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=50978

Even coal is making a comeback.

I don’t think net zero is in our future.

Edited by brenthutch

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, wmw999 said:

Oh I know - compromise is evil. Only a “my way or the highway” approach is strong; anything else is weak and shows that you really don’t care, right?

I’m sorry, that’s utter and arrant bullshit.

Wendy P. 

“I am harsh, I am cold,  and my name……?

image.jpeg.416c9ae9b232431ad7206649759ec8cc.jpeg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, wmw999 said:

Oh I know - compromise is evil. Only a “my way or the highway” approach is strong; anything else is weak and shows that you really don’t care, right?

I’m sorry, that’s utter and arrant bullshit.

Wendy P. 

I certainly don't think that compromise is "evil." However I do not think we should be giving such large subsidies to an industry that manipulates our government to constantly provide them with tax breaks and deregulation to an industry that sells products that are harmful to not only the environment but humans as well. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, brenthutch said:

“we expect U.S. fossil fuel production to continue rising in both 2022 and 2023, surpassing production in 2019, to reach a new record in 2023.”

https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=50978

Even coal is making a comeback.

I don’t think net zero is in our future.

Well it's not because we all didn't try.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, brenthutch said:

As my grandmother used to say: try in one hand and poop in the other, and see what one fills up first.

Is that why continuing to spew shit into the atmosphere rather than trying to clean it up seems to be what your in favor of? WTF does that even mean?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, wmw999 said:

I like to backpack. Sometimes the best way to get to where I want to sleep is to go back to avoid an obstacle I found. If I were 6’ tall and 30 I might be able to go through or over some of them, but I’m not  

Wendy P. 

Its OK Wendy, exercise is one of the health recommended remedy's How You Can Avoid Losing Height as You Get Older

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I’m actually still the same height I’ve always been, or at least I was at my last checkup. Which since I’m 67 is pretty good. And weight-bearing exercise is best; that backpack definitely counts

I’ll admit that the only way I’ve ever been 6 feet tall is standing on a stepstool :tongue:

Wendy P. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

“The hard reality is that decarbonizing the global electric grid will require finding economically viable — and socially acceptable — substitutes for coal and natural gas. Sure, renewables are politically popular and they are growing. But both wind and solar are facing increasing headwinds because of land-use conflicts. Since 2015, more than 300 local communities from Maine to Hawaii have rejected or restricted wind projects. The backlash against Big Solar is also gaining momentum. Over the summer, Big Solar projects in Pennsylvania, Nevada and Montana were rejected. Among the most recent rejections: In November, regulators in Henry County, Va., rejected two large proposed solar projects.”

It is amusing that sharing this simple reality results in name calling and personal attacks.  My thread “The Green New Deal = Magical Thinking”  was so controversial that it was eventually locked.  Ironically, global CO2 emissions are greater now than they were a half a decade ago when I started the thread.  #Vindicated 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
(edited)
1 hour ago, brenthutch said:

“The hard reality is that decarbonizing the global electric grid will require finding economically viable — and socially acceptable — substitutes for coal and natural gas. Sure, renewables are politically popular and they are growing. But both wind and solar are facing increasing headwinds because of land-use conflicts. Since 2015, more than 300 local communities from Maine to Hawaii have rejected or restricted wind projects. The backlash against Big Solar is also gaining momentum. Over the summer, Big Solar projects in Pennsylvania, Nevada and Montana were rejected. Among the most recent rejections: In November, regulators in Henry County, Va., rejected two large proposed solar projects.”

It is amusing that sharing this simple reality results in name calling and personal attacks.  My thread “The Green New Deal = Magical Thinking”  was so controversial that it was eventually locked.  Ironically, global CO2 emissions are greater now than they were a half a decade ago when I started the thread.  #Vindicated 

Well, of course global CO2 emissions are higher, also the numbers of global peoples are higher and, since legalization, the numbers of Oregonians is higher, too. I suspect you wouldn't conflate braking with stopping or refuse to accept that without braking there might be no stopping and a probably a lot more crashing. Time to feed your candy colored unicorn again.

Edited by JoeWeber

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0