1 1
brenthutch

Climate Fails 2021

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, kallend said:

I suppose one of our deniers will be along to tell us that the current  January 2 tornado watch in KY, TN and AL is due to arson, along with the record breaking December 2021 tornado outbreak there.   Couldn't possibly be climate change.

https://cei.org/blog/president-biden-sows-the-whirlwind/

“Extreme tornadoes are in decline as the world has warmed. And it seems a bit insensitive to piggyback on people’s misfortune in order to push climate policies that recent polls indicate no one wants.”

I know it feels “truthy” to blame bad weather on the sins of Man, but the facts contradict.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, brenthutch said:

https://cei.org/blog/president-biden-sows-the-whirlwind/

“Extreme tornadoes are in decline as the world has warmed. And it seems a bit insensitive to piggyback on people’s misfortune in order to push climate policies that recent polls indicate no one wants.”

I know it feels “truthy” to blame bad weather on the sins of Man, but the facts contradict.

Can we assume then, that you will no longer cite weather conditions as evidence that the worlds climate isn’t warming? You seem to do that often.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, murps2000 said:

Can we assume then, that you will no longer cite weather conditions as evidence that the worlds climate isn’t warming? You seem to do that often.

I will leave it up to NOAA to determine if the planet is warming or cooling. According to them it is colder now than it was in 2015.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, brenthutch said:

I will leave it up to NOAA

Why don't you leave everything to them and stop posting your terrible "interpretation" of their articles*? :rofl::rofl:

We can read their articles just fine.

 

*articles, NOT data - you're not using their data, as their articles are already pre-interpreted from actual data (which you don't bother looking at since you can barely add two numbers together)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, olofscience said:

 

*articles, NOT data - you're not using their data, as their articles are already pre-interpreted from actual data (which you don't bother looking at since you can barely add two numbers together)

That is pretty rich coming from a guy who doesn’t know the difference between coal and food

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
(edited)
1 hour ago, brenthutch said:

That is pretty rich coming from a guy who doesn’t know the difference between coal and food

Definitely believable right? :rofl: Far more credible than you, and your numerous mistakes here, actually being unable to do maths right? :rofl: /s

Edited by olofscience

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

1 1