I wonder how long she has . . .

[turtlespeed 226]

4 hours ago, jakee said:

 

Ok then, let's play " Does Turtle know how to read?" 

 

Who says the death threats are credible?

I'm sure you can google.  (Another assumption)

I'll do it for you, though.

https://www.google.com/search?q=credible+death+threats+maxwell&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS842US842&oq=credible+death+threats+maxwell&aqs=chrome..69i57.3631j0j8&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

[jakee 1,594]

4 hours ago, turtlespeed said:

I'm sure you can google.  (Another assumption)

I'll do it for you, though.

All those hits are, like your OP, based on the same Daily Mail article. In that article, who says the threats are credible?

 

Come on man, this isn't hard. I've given you the answer already in this thread. 

[turtlespeed 226]

8 hours ago, jakee said:

All those hits are, like your OP, based on the same Daily Mail article. In that article, who says the threats are credible?

 

Come on man, this isn't hard. I've given you the answer already in this thread. 

The media, But you knew that too.

You are right - it isn't hard.  

[jakee 1,594]

2 hours ago, turtlespeed said:

The media, But you knew that too.

You are right - it isn't hard.  

I’ve asked you this before but I’m still curious - what is it that you think you gain by pretending to be that stupid? It’s just weird. 

 

But ok, let’s take your feigned cluelessness at face value and assume you are incapable of reading the article and seeing where the claim comes from.  Let’s just go with “the media” said it. Why did you take exception to a post saying there’s a possibility that something in the media might not be entirely true? Given your posting history don’t you think that’s a teeny bit hypocritical?

[turtlespeed 226]

1 hour ago, jakee said:

I’ve asked you this before but I’m still curious - what is it that you think you gain by pretending to be that stupid? It’s just weird. 

 

But ok, let’s take your feigned cluelessness at face value and assume you are incapable of reading the article and seeing where the claim comes from.  Let’s just go with “the media” said it. Why did you take exception to a post saying there’s a possibility that something in the media might not be entirely true? Given your posting history don’t you think that’s a teeny bit hypocritical?

Instead of focusing on me . . . try the subject matter.

I really don't want a residence in your head.

[jakee 1,594]

20 minutes ago, turtlespeed said:

Instead of focusing on me . . . try the subject matter.

Well I did try, but you once again refuse to engage on a topic you supposedly wanted to talk about because you know that giving an honest answer will mean needing to back down. Which you will never do.

 

But OK, I'll ask you about the subject matter again. In the article, who says there's a credible threat? 

Edited January 8, 2020 by jakee

[turtlespeed 226]

1 hour ago, jakee said:

Well I did try, but you once again refuse to engage on a topic you supposedly wanted to talk about because you know that giving an honest answer will mean needing to back down. Which you will never do.

 

But OK, I'll ask you about the subject matter again. In the article, who says there's a credible threat? 

A source.

You probably knew that already.  I don't see why I continually have to do all the research for you.

It's probably the whistle-blower in the Ukraine.

[jakee 1,594]

17 minutes ago, turtlespeed said:

A source.

Right, a source who is a friend of Maxwell. A source who claims that Maxwell is an innocent victim, despite the fact that we can be about 99.99% sure she's actually a despicable human trafficker and supplier of children to one of the most prolific paedophiles known. So when that same source talks about safehouses, special forces protection and credible threats, why do you think we must believe her?

 

Quote

You probably knew that already.  I don't see why I continually have to do all the research for you.

If you realise I know it already then you know you're not doing the work for me. Again, why do you pretend to be this stupid? What do you have to gain from it?

[gowlerk 2,274]

13 minutes ago, jakee said:

If you realise I know it already then you know you're not doing the work for me. Again, why do you pretend to be this stupid? What do you have to gain from it?

Some gotta play the duck, some gotta play the turtle.