normiss 886 #26 June 18, 2019 2 hours ago, Rick said: it may also be a good climate for a 3rd party candidate to actually have a shot Until it lands on the desks at the Electoral College. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #27 June 18, 2019 4 hours ago, Rick said: it may also be a good climate for a 3rd party candidate to actually have a shot Agreed - we need better options - Wait - would that be <Gasp> Climate change? <Shocked> 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DJL 235 #28 June 18, 2019 1 hour ago, turtlespeed said: Agreed - we need better options - Wait - would that be <Gasp> Climate change? <Shocked> Moderators. Ban. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rick 67 #29 June 18, 2019 1 minute ago, DJL said: Moderators. Ban. it was a pretty cheesy joke but I doubt it is ban worthy but I'm no moderator Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #30 June 18, 2019 1 hour ago, Rick said: it was a pretty cheesy joke but I doubt it is ban worthy but I'm no moderator I'll even raise it to Corny. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wolfriverjoe 1,523 #31 June 18, 2019 8 hours ago, Rick said: it may also be a good climate for a 3rd party candidate to actually have a shot I thought that in 2016. HRC was a poor choice. Trump was a horrible choice. If there was any election that 3rd parties had a chance of making any sort of showing, it was then. Yet the 3rd parties got almost the same, minute number of votes that they always do. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
