G.H.W. Bush

[RonD1120 62]

Phil1111

***...
What started me in this direction when a close friend who was a black ops CIA operative encouraged me to look into JFK's assassination. I already had suspicions and much was confirmed.

Is he the one, or does he believe that G.W. Bush was working for the C.I.A. in 1963 when President Kennedy was assassinated? That G.W. Bush was nefariously involved in that event?

These questions arise from the link you mentioned referring to an earlier post of mine.

As I said, my friend pointed me in a direction. He neither confirms or denies GHWB's involvement. He has only stated the obvious that the CIA is more than you think it is.

GHWB started the Zapata Oil Corporation with the assistance of Allen Dulles. Dulles was the director of the CIA. The Bay of Pigs invasion was initially named Operation Zapata. The Zapata company was seeking offshore drilling near Cuba. JFK inherited the BoP and was not totally in favor. Many believe that BoP failed because of the lack of support from JFK. Furthermore, he was not in favor of escalating the civil war in Vietnam.

What does it all mean?

What I and my friend learned from 1965 and beyond is that you cannot trust the federal government.

Look for the shiny things of God revealed by the Holy Spirit. They only last for an instant but it is a Holy Instant. Let your soul absorb them.

[yoink 321]

RonD1120

***

Quote

Remember GHWB's "Thousand Points of Light?"

Wait!! I get it!! Maybe it's not about community volunteers, but an even grander scheme to create his Points of Light Foundation to embed moles in several different countries to help create a new world order!! Am I close?

Maybe

I tend to look for double meanings. There is the one presented and the actual force behind it.

A prime example is when a person is demonstrably angry. The behavior can be seen and dealt with. The question is, what is the fear driving the anger?

Everything in life is smoke and mirrors. Perception is the reality.


*facepalm

I actually believe it when you say that you actively look for double meanings. I think that's why you see so much imaginary nonsense when there's nothing there. You WANT to believe so much that anything becomes possible.

The problem is that what you describe (what fear is driving anger) isn't a double meaning; it's just cause and effect, or root cause analysis if you want to get technical.

The issue with confusing the two is that one should be completely logical and unemotional, the other is driven by interpretation and so doesn't have the same weight to the output.
I'd have expected a counselor to know that... Asking 'what made you feel that way?' is very different than trying to interpret a patients words to read between the lines on your own.

[dmcoco84 5]

Quote

George Washington: "the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion."

You're Fuckin' Hilarious, Bill.

billvon

>The problem is that the Koran has never been a basis of law in the U.S. but the Holy Bible has.

Actually the US has gone out of its way to state over and over that it is does not respect any version of religion.

Constitution: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion"

George Washington: "the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion."

>The current trend is not to replace the Holy Bible with the Koran. The goal is to replace
>the Holy Bible with the existential religion of humanism.

The US Constitution did that over 200 years ago.

>New evidence being presented indicates that GHWB was deeply entrenched in the
>Luciferian influence primarily through his involvement in the spook world of the Skull and
>Bones and the CIA.

The crazy straw Qanon type claims don't really matter here. Whether the far right claims he is a disciple of the Devil, or paid the mob to shoot Kennedy, or organized 9/11 is beside the point What matters is that GWHB has now been declared "not conservative enough" by the far right, and is thus a subject of attack even after his death. Which is yet another indication that the country is moving steadily to the right.

>The Bible states that the sins of the father can/will be passed down three generations.

How fortunate we do not follow the Bible within the US government, then.

>What started me in this direction when a close friend who was a black ops CIA
>operative encouraged me to look into JFK's assassination. I already had suspicions and
>much was confirmed.

Any time I hear someone claiming to be a black ops CIA secret agent, and then talks about all his secrets, my first thought is that I hope he gets help for his delusions, and that he doesn't harm himself or others before that happens. We had Spectre230 here years ago who made similar claims. His military skydives from the Space Shuttle were especially vivid.

[billvon 3,111]

My bad; make that John Adams, who followed George Washington as President.

[RonD1120 62]

yoink

******

Quote

Remember GHWB's "Thousand Points of Light?"

Wait!! I get it!! Maybe it's not about community volunteers, but an even grander scheme to create his Points of Light Foundation to embed moles in several different countries to help create a new world order!! Am I close?

Maybe

I tend to look for double meanings. There is the one presented and the actual force behind it.

A prime example is when a person is demonstrably angry. The behavior can be seen and dealt with. The question is, what is the fear driving the anger?

Everything in life is smoke and mirrors. Perception is the reality.


*facepalm

I actually believe it when you say that you actively look for double meanings. I think that's why you see so much imaginary nonsense when there's nothing there. You WANT to believe so much that anything becomes possible.

The problem is that what you describe (what fear is driving anger) isn't a double meaning; it's just cause and effect, or root cause analysis if you want to get technical.

The issue with confusing the two is that one should be completely logical and unemotional, the other is driven by interpretation and so doesn't have the same weight to the output.
I'd have expected a counselor to know that... Asking 'what made you feel that way?' is very different than trying to interpret a patients words to read between the lines on your own.

Be careful with expectations of other individuals. You will be disappointed more often than not.

From my perspective, your last paragraph is two ways of saying the same thing. Talking to a dually diagnosed substance user/abuser/addict is quite challenging.

Look for the shiny things of God revealed by the Holy Spirit. They only last for an instant but it is a Holy Instant. Let your soul absorb them.