0
ryoder

Gorsuch casts deciding SCOTUS vote against deporting immigrant

Recommended Posts

ryoder

http://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/383512-supreme-court-invalidates-law-requiring-the-deportation-of

I felt a great disturbance in the Force, as if millions of tweets xenophobic idiots suddenly cried out in rage.
:D



FIFY :)
"There are NO situations which do not call for a French Maid outfit." Lucky McSwervy

"~ya don't GET old by being weak & stupid!" - Airtwardo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
While it's politically amusing to see the situation, personally I think the guy should be deported and the vagueness of the law is hindering it and is a real problem.

Quote


Justice Department Spokesman Devin O’Malley, meanwhile, pushed for congressional action in the wake of the court’s ruling.

“The Justice Department believes that certain crimes committed by an illegal alien, visa holder, or an alien otherwise granted lawful status in the United States, should trigger their removal,” he said in a statement.



I agree - as long as you're a guest in someone's home your behavior needs to be impeccable. Get your feet off the couch and stop raiding the fridge!

For me, any crime that cannot reasonably be committed accidentally is grounds for deportation for a non-citizen. You know the rules and if you choose to break them then we don't want you here - it's that simple.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
yoink



I agree - as long as you're a guest in someone's home your behavior needs to be impeccable. Get your feet off the couch and stop raiding the fridge!



I think you'll change your tune when the roads become clogged with every green card holder, H1B visa holder, J1 visa holder, F1 visa holder, etc. driving impeccably at the listed speed limit or below.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

For me, any crime that cannot reasonably be committed accidentally is grounds for deportation for a non-citizen. You know the rules and if you choose to break them then we don't want you here - it's that simple.



But that's not what the law says. Maybe it should, but it doesn't. The ruling today was that the law is unclear. And that it is important for everyone that it be clear.
Always remember the brave children who died defending your right to bear arms. Freedom is not free.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
gowlerk

Quote

For me, any crime that cannot reasonably be committed accidentally is grounds for deportation for a non-citizen. You know the rules and if you choose to break them then we don't want you here - it's that simple.



But that's not what the law says. Maybe it should, but it doesn't. The ruling today was that the law is unclear. And that it is important for everyone that it be clear.



Absolutely.

And my opinion is that the law needs to change to remove the ambiguity. For now SCOTUS made the correct decision - I simply don't agree with why they had to make it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kallend

***

I agree - as long as you're a guest in someone's home your behavior needs to be impeccable. Get your feet off the couch and stop raiding the fridge!



I think you'll change your tune when the roads become clogged with every green card holder, H1B visa holder, J1 visa holder, F1 visa holder, etc. driving impeccably at the listed speed limit or below.

I chose my phrasing very carefully. It's easy to accidentally go over the speed limit. It's easy to miss a deadline on a parking ticket - those situations can be reasonably explained by accidents. Burglary? Not so much.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>I think you'll change your tune when the roads become clogged with every green card
>holder, H1B visa holder, J1 visa holder, F1 visa holder, etc. driving impeccably at the listed
>speed limit or below.

Or - more to the point - you might see green card holders, visa holders etc deciding to not burglarize homes in record numbers. O the horror. How will society cope?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ryoder

http://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/383512-supreme-court-invalidates-law-requiring-the-deportation-of

I felt a great disturbance in the Force, as if millions of tweets suddenly cried out in rage.
:D

Of course, not long ago Gorsuch voted with the conservative majority to rule that lawful immigrants (including permanent residents), as well as people applying for asylum and undocumented people, can be held indefinitely and they are not entitled to a bond hearing (link). The person at the center of the case was a permanent resident who was convicted years ago of "joyriding" and misdemeanor possession of a controlled substance. He was picked up by ICE (under the Obama administration BTW) and held for more than three years with no court date in sight before the Ninth Circuit court ruled that he was entitled to a bond hearing and ordered his release. That ruling was overturned by the Supreme Court.

Welcome to America, the land where you can be picked up and held in jail for years without your "day*" in court.
*"day" typically being 5-7 minutes

Don
_____________________________________
Tolerance is the cost we must pay for our adventure in liberty. (Dworkin, 1996)
“Education is not filling a bucket, but lighting a fire.” (Yeats)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0