jakee 1,564 #26 May 18, 2018 Bob_Church***We see enough people here who constantly need to be corrected because what they are posting is simply incorrect. That means that campaigns to sway opinion and votes are definitely working. But this article seemed to be mostly about the actual numbers of viewers. All of these other arguments seem mute since we can see that very very few people even saw these. But what about the other ones? At the top of the article it mentions the release of data on over 3000 ads, then breaks down the data on what, 5 of them? Why did they choose those 5? Are they genuinely representative, are they random, have they been cherry picked to downplay the engagement? Do you know?Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
