kallend 2,175 #1 August 28, 2017 20 Texas GOP representatives, and Sens. Ted Cruz (R) and John Cornyn (R) of Texas, each voted against the federal relief package for victims of 2012’s Superstorm Sandy. Now they ask for federal assistance. HYPOCRITES!... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
grimmie 186 #2 August 29, 2017 And lied about why they voted no. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gowlerk 2,283 #3 August 29, 2017 Is Texas a red state? I've heard that God loves red states.Always remember the brave children who died defending your right to bear arms. Freedom is not free. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #4 August 29, 2017 gowlerkIs Texas a red state? I've heard that God loves red states. I heard God punishes homosexuals by sending hurricanes to their state. I wonder how Osteen feels about that today? Oh, who am I kidding? He's still probably fine with it.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,175 #5 August 29, 2017 gowlerkIs Texas a red state? I've heard that God loves red states. There's an ark in Kentucky. God doesn't seem too good at geography.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
piisfish 140 #6 August 31, 2017 Got to give credit to Belgian humour: Finally the wall was a good ideascissors beat paper, paper beat rock, rock beat wingsuit - KarlM Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Phil1111 1,193 #7 September 1, 2017 Harvey to be costliest natural disaster in U.S. history, estimated cost of $190 billion Hurricane Harvey could be the costliest natural disaster in U.S. history with a potential price tag of $190 billion, according to a preliminary estimate from private weather firm AccuWeather. This is equal to the combined cost of Hurricanes Katrina and Sandy, and represents a 1% economic hit to the gross national product, AccuWeather said. “Parts of Houston, the United States' fourth largest city, will be uninhabitable for weeks and possibly months due to water damage, mold, disease-ridden water and all that will follow this 1,000-year flood,” said AccuWeather president Joel Myers. https://www.usatoday.com/story/weather/2017/08/30/harvey-costliest-natural-disaster-u-s-history-estimated-cost-160-billion/615708001/ Hurricane Harvey damage costs could reach $75 billion, research firm says... The firm's current estimate ranges from $48 billion to $75 billion, with an average of $57 billion.... "The computer models we normally use to do estimates for hurricanes don't really work that well for this kind of a storm," Chuck Watson, the director of research and development at Enki Research, said in an interview with "Power Lunch." "This is more like a big, broad flooding low-pressure type thing and it's over such a large area that a lot of the normal assumptions that you build into the system start to break down."... JPMorgan predicts the eventual insured losses from Harvey could be as much as $10 billion to $20 billion. However, Watson pointed out that he's currently estimating about 20 percent of the damage will be covered by insurance. "It's going to be a huge hit to the flood insurance program, but we're currently thinking as much as 70 or 75 percent of the losses and impact from this storm will not be insured," he said. https://www.cnbc.com/2017/08/30/hurricane-harvey-damage-costs-could-reach-75-billion-research-firm-says.html Well trump wanted a infrastructure and jobs bill. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nolhtairt 0 #8 September 1, 2017 Insurance is such a goddamn racket. You pay for it, and then a disaster happens, then they won't pay for it, or nowhere near enough to cover your losses. It's one of the pitfalls of living near the coast. Do so at your own risk. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,175 #9 September 1, 2017 nolhtairt Insurance is such a goddamn racket. You pay for it, and then a disaster happens, then they won't pay for it, or nowhere near enough to cover your losses. It's one of the pitfalls of living near the coast. Do so at your own risk. Then there are the "it won't happen to me" idiots who don't buy insurance, and then expect taxpayers or charities to pick up the bill when it does happen.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
airdvr 210 #10 September 1, 2017 Flood insurance is issued by FEMA. If you live in a flood zone and have a mortgage you were probably required to carry flood insurance. I saw an estimate that only 20% of the homes carry the insurance. Seems low. Either way, we'll all pay. Funny how some on here are OK with people not carrying health insurance but are berated as scum for no flood insurance.Please don't dent the planet. Destinations by Roxanne Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,131 #11 September 1, 2017 >Funny how some on here are OK with people not carrying health insurance but are >berated as scum for no flood insurance. Like who? (other than that notorious poster StrawMan) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gowlerk 2,283 #12 September 1, 2017 Is it too soon to start comparing Irma to Harvey? She could be arriving to a coastline near you in a week or so. Probably not as late as the 23rd though...... Edited, because I got the date of the upcoming apocalypse wrong. Always remember the brave children who died defending your right to bear arms. Freedom is not free. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 905 #13 September 1, 2017 No need to worry John, per POTUS, "Texas is heeling fast". Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,175 #14 September 1, 2017 normissNo need to worry John, per POTUS, "Texas is heeling fast". Maybe that 0.01% contribution he promised will prevent it from capsizing.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 905 #15 September 1, 2017 I would expect his contribution to work as well as the $1,000,000 he promised the Veterans group. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DanG 1 #16 September 1, 2017 A lot of these areas were never expected to flood, so flood insurance may not have been available. But don't worry, Trumps wants to cut the funding for the people responsible for updating and maintaining flood maps. - Dan G Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,175 #17 September 1, 2017 DanGA lot of these areas were never expected to flood, so flood insurance may not have been available. But don't worry, Trumps wants to cut the funding for the people responsible for updating and maintaining flood maps. Insurance companies are usually quite happy to sell you policies against things they are sure won't happen.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,175 #18 September 1, 2017 DanG But don't worry, Trumps wants to cut the funding for the people responsible for updating and maintaining flood maps. That money will go towards his wall. Maybe he should make it waterproof. www.bostonglobe.com/news/nation/2017/08/30/house-republicans-spending-bill-includes-fema-cuts-fund-trump-border-wall/VSf07WfdiwyhOFOoOKZ7pL/story.html... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wmw999 2,600 #19 September 2, 2017 NFIP flood insurance is federally subsidized; it's what makes it affordable. I had it in Houston (my Houston house didn't flood). It's cost was about 1/4 of the regular homeowner's insurance cost. The issue is that the chances of needing to pay out are smaller, but when you have to, the percentage value of the house is likely to be larger, and they're almost certain to be paying for lots of homes at once, instead of a couple of house fires, or break-ins, or even a tornado. Wendy P.There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites