0
billvon

Study - Exxon intentionally deceived public

Recommended Posts

A recent study published in IOP Science confirms what many have suspected. Exxon knew that climate change was real and that it was caused by human emissions, but intentionally misled the public by printing public ads casting doubt on the science - science that was confirmed by their own scientists.

From the article:

". . . accounting for expressions of reasonable doubt, 83% of [Exxon's] peer-reviewed papers and 80% of internal documents acknowledge that climate change is real and human-caused, yet only 12% of advertorials do so, with 81% instead expressing doubt. We conclude that ExxonMobil contributed to advancing climate science—by way of its scientists' academic publications—but promoted doubt about it in advertorials. Given this discrepancy, we conclude that ExxonMobil misled the public. "

http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aa815f

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
nolhtairt

I know it really doesn't make any difference, but I quit buying Exxon gas after the Valdez accident.



I agree it doesn't make any difference, but BP's Deepwater Horizon negligence was worse. One drunken captain isn't the same as systematic disregard for safety in the deep-water environment.

Large oil companies calculate risk with little premium on the environment. Nigeria oil operations by multinationals is the best example. Bribes, kickbacks, spills, dumping of contaminated materials are all part and parcel of operations.

I don't have anything against them. People need oil and energy. But for the largest companies everything is calculated and factored into risk. The environment is a political responsibility and a marketing/PR sideline.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No, you didn't.

You may have stopped buying from Exxon franchise retailers, but the idea that you haven't purchased any gasoline refined by Exxon, or made from oil extracted by Exxon is a bit far fetched.

Oil and oil products are interchanged, mixed, and bought and resold so much that trying to get any sort of 'original source' is very difficult.
"There are NO situations which do not call for a French Maid outfit." Lucky McSwervy

"~ya don't GET old by being weak & stupid!" - Airtwardo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Phil1111

***One drunken captain isn't the same as systematic disregard for safety in the deep-water environment.



I do enjoy the persistence of this myth.

The Captain wasn't even on the bridge at the time, and a search of the vessel found two bottles of beer.

More to the point about boycotts, boycotting a retailer of a fungible commodity is pointless, because you have no idea when you buy gasoline where it actually came from. Neither, in most cases, does the retailer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
wolfriverjoe

No, you didn't.

You may have stopped buying from Exxon franchise retailers, but the idea that you haven't purchased any gasoline refined by Exxon, or made from oil extracted by Exxon is a bit far fetched.

Oil and oil products are interchanged, mixed, and bought and resold so much that trying to get any sort of 'original source' is very difficult.



This is correct, there's no telling where two drops from the same well will end up as there are various markets between drill and gas pump.
"I encourage all awesome dangerous behavior." - Jeffro Fincher

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The captain was drinking and smelled of alcohol immediately prior to departure.

Only one officer was on the bridge at the time of grounding and fatigue was blamed in part for the accident. Two officers where required to be on the bridge according to company policy.

The Exxon Valdez departed at 9:21, Hazelwood left the bridge for about an hour, returned, then left the bridge again at 11:53 and the collision occurred at 12:04. Less than 21/2 hours after departure.

So Hazelwood left a tired third mate in charge only 21/2 hours after casting off when the tanker was transiting the most difficult part of the entire trip.

Review of accident:
http://www.evostc.state.ak.us/index.cfm?FA=facts.details

Hazelwood spent most of the day conducting ship's business, shopping and, according to testimony before the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), drinking alcoholic beverages with the other ship's officers in at least two Valdez bars. Testimony indicated Hazelwood drank nonalcoholic beverages that day at lunch, a number of alcoholic drinks late that afternoon while relaxing in a Valdez bar, and at least one more drink at a bar while the party waited for pizza to take with them back to the ship....

A ship's agent who met with Hazelwood after he got back on the ship said it appeared the captain may have been drinking because his eyes were watery, but she did not smell alcohol on his breath. Ship's pilot Murphy, however, later indicated that he did detect the odor of alcohol on Hazelwood's breath.

"Until the Exxon Valdez piled onto Bligh Reef, the system designed to carry 2 million barrels of North Slope oil to West Coast and Gulf Coast markets daily had worked perhaps too well. At least partly because of the success of the Valdez tanker trade, a general complacency had come to permeate the operation and oversight of the entire system...

Industry's insistence on regulating the Valdez tanker trade its own way, and government's incremental accession to industry pressure, had produced a disastrous failure of the system"
http://www.evostc.state.ak.us/index.cfm?FA=facts.details

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
normiss

I don't buy BP gas because they have the opposite pump handle colors than the established ones.
:S
I buy a lot of diesel. ;)




I own shares in both BP and Exxon. I don't buy fuel from either of them. I buy from my local Co-op. They send me a rebate cheque yearly. When I'm at work I buy diesel from the same place as most other truckers. Pilot/Flying J. I have no idea who refines it.
Always remember the brave children who died defending your right to bear arms. Freedom is not free.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Phil1111

One drunken captain isn't the same as systematic disregard for safety in the deep-water environment....

"Until the Exxon Valdez piled onto Bligh Reef, the system designed to carry 2 million barrels of North Slope oil to West Coast and Gulf Coast markets daily had worked perhaps too well. At least partly because of the success of the Valdez tanker trade, a general complacency had come to permeate the operation and oversight of the entire system...

Industry's insistence on regulating the Valdez tanker trade its own way, and government's incremental accession to industry pressure, had produced a disastrous failure of the system"
http://www.evostc.state.ak.us/index.cfm?FA=facts.details



What your link says, Phil, is that one drunken Captain was symptomatic of a systematic disregard for safety in the maritime environment.

BP, Halliburton, Exxon... same shit different day. (And all examples of how the 'industry will regulate itself' argument is total bullshit)
Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0