Russiagate

[SkyDekker 1,465]

That was from Fox News. They too mainstream for you now?

[billvon 3,114]

A lot of Republicans are waking up, too. From the Tucson Weekly:

================
[Republican Congresswoman Martha] McSally complained that President Donald Trump and his tweets were creating troubling "distractions" and "it's basically being taken out on me. Any Republican member of Congress, you are going down with the ship. And we're going to hand the gavel to Pelosi in 2018, they only need 28 seats and the path to that gavel being handed over is through my seat. And right now, it doesn't matter that it's me, it doesn't matter what I've done. I have an 'R' next to my name and right now, this environment would have me not prevail."
=================

Are you sick of all the winning yet?

[billvon 3,114]

>That was from Fox News. They too mainstream for you now?

Well, they are to the left of Breitbart, Stormfront and Newsmax.

[rushmc 23]

SkyDekker

That was from Fox News. They too mainstream for you now?

Oh I get it.

since CNN refused to report on that bit of truth there is nothing to it then in your CNN world.

Nice thing? You cant refute what I posted so you yet again go source attacking.

Lame desperation to try and protect the truthiness of a disgruntled liar. (he just go caught)



You guys are getting as loony as CNN but then, why not, it is very very obvious who feeds you your opinions.

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[rushmc 23]

There is no collusion so now we move to obstruction but, for there to be obstruction there needs to be a crime.

What crime Bill???

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[billvon 3,114]

>Lame desperation to try and protect the truthiness of a disgruntled liar. (he just go
>caught)

An excellent description of your attempts to defend Trump.

[SkyDekker 1,465]

rushmc

***That was from Fox News. They too mainstream for you now?

Oh I get it.

since CNN refused to report on that bit of truth there is nothing to it then in your CNN world.

Nice thing? You cant refute what I posted so you yet again go source attacking.

Lame desperation to try and protect the truthiness of a disgruntled liar. (he just go caught)



You guys are getting as loony as CNN but then, why not, it is very very obvious who feeds you your opinions.

You are ranting.

You seemed to object to information from Fox News. You have previously been a big proponent of them. Just wondering what changed?

Quote

protect the truthiness of a disgruntled liar

Are you of the opinion Comey is a bigger liar than Trump? You seem to implicate that you have caught Comey in a lie and therefor everything he says is suspect. But, you don't take the same stance with Trump. Does this make sense to you?

[rushmc 23]

billvon

>Lame desperation to try and protect the truthiness of a disgruntled liar. (he just go
>caught)

An excellent description of your attempts to defend Trump.

And you can't deflect Comey's lie either.

And you call my posts attempts

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[rushmc 23]

SkyDekker

******That was from Fox News. They too mainstream for you now?

Oh I get it.

since CNN refused to report on that bit of truth there is nothing to it then in your CNN world.

Nice thing? You cant refute what I posted so you yet again go source attacking.

Lame desperation to try and protect the truthiness of a disgruntled liar. (he just go caught)



You guys are getting as loony as CNN but then, why not, it is very very obvious who feeds you your opinions.

You are ranting.

You seemed to object to information from Fox News. You have previously been a big proponent of them. Just wondering what changed?

Quote

protect the truthiness of a disgruntled liar

Are you of the opinion Comey is a bigger liar than Trump? You seem to implicate that you have caught Comey in a lie and therefor everything he says is suspect. But, you don't take the same stance with Trump. Does this make sense to you?

I am not objecting to anything

And is comey a bigger liar? Why would you ask an irrelevant question like that?

You, Bill and others are taking Comey at his word.
No proof as we have a he said she said situation. But that is not what your political ego needs right now. Even though Comey did not give you anthing you needed

It is you who needs to look at ones stance.

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[billvon 3,114]

I gotta say, Rush, that your posts have become nothing more than unhinged rants over the past day or so. Why not take a deep breath, turn off the TV and calm down a bit?

[rushmc 23]

billvon

I gotta say, Rush, that your posts have become nothing more than unhinged rants over the past day or so. Why not take a deep breath, turn off the TV and calm down a bit?

I have not seen any tv for weeks.
And I am plenty calm.

I gotta say Bill. I have never had more fun posting here than I have in the last few weeks.

I answer your accusations and you change directions.
Same when I point out your double standards.
Same when you got to site attacking.
All Alinsky tactics on display.

Like, you can't refute the Comey lie I posted.

No Bill, I am plenty calm. And once again the breathless hopeful anticipation of the left is dashed.

I am looking forward to great weekend.

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[SkyDekker 1,465]

Quote

And is comey a bigger liar? Why would you ask an irrelevant question like that?

Why would I ask that? Well I will tell you.

You have become very worked up now, and in the past, about certain people telling lies.

However, you have never, ever, posted anything that would show you are even the slightest bit concerned about the multitude of lies that Trump has spoken.

Just wondering why it is so upsetting for you from certain people, but perfectly fine from other people?

[billvon 3,114]

rushmc

***I gotta say, Rush, that your posts have become nothing more than unhinged rants over the past day or so. Why not take a deep breath, turn off the TV and calm down a bit?

. . . .your accusations and you change directions . . . I point out your double standards. . . . site attacking. . . Comey lie
Or not.

[rushmc 23]

SkyDekker

Quote

And is comey a bigger liar? Why would you ask an irrelevant question like that?

Why would I ask that? Well I will tell you.

You have become very worked up now, and in the past, about certain people telling lies.

However, you have never, ever, posted anything that would show you are even the slightest bit concerned about the multitude of lies that Trump has spoken.

Just wondering why it is so upsetting for you from certain people, but perfectly fine from other people?

You and Bill must be taking mind reading classes together.

I gotta say you need a new teacher.

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[SkyDekker 1,465]

I am just basing it on your posting here.

But I get that you aren't going to address those simple questions.

[rushmc 23]

SkyDekker

[

Just wondering why it is so upsetting for you from certain people, but perfectly fine from other people?

Have you looked in a mirror lately?

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[jakee 1,594]

rushmc

There is no collusion so now we move to obstruction but, for there to be obstruction there needs to be a crime.

That is not true. Obstruction of justice is the obstruction and/or interference with an investigation.

If there was nothing for the investigators to find, preventing them from finding that out is still an offence, it's just a doubly stupid one.

Do you want to have an ideagasm?

[mistercwood 287]

rushmc

***[

Just wondering why it is so upsetting for you from certain people, but perfectly fine from other people?

Have you looked in a mirror lately?

Have you ever had an original thought in your entire life? I don't understand how you can devote so much energy to being wilfully ignorant all the time - I'd be exhausted.

You are playing chicken with a planet - you can't dodge and planets don't blink. Act accordingly.

[rushmc 23]

mistercwood

******[

Just wondering why it is so upsetting for you from certain people, but perfectly fine from other people?

Have you looked in a mirror lately?

Have you ever had an original thought in your entire life? I don't understand how you can devote so much energy to being wilfully ignorant all the time - I'd be exhausted.

Liberal on display

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[mr2mk1g 10]

rushmc

*********[

Just wondering why it is so upsetting for you from certain people, but perfectly fine from other people?

Have you looked in a mirror lately?

Have you ever had an original thought in your entire life? I don't understand how you can devote so much energy to being wilfully ignorant all the time - I'd be exhausted.

Liberal on display

That doesn't even make sense.

[billvon 3,114]

>That is not true. Obstruction of justice is the obstruction and/or interference with
>an investigation.

And even the GOP is starting to condemn Trump for that now. From The Week:

=================
This former GOP congressman voted to impeach Clinton. He thinks Trump's transgressions are worse.

Not a good sign

June 9, 2017

House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) claims he still wouldn't be calling for impeachment even if a Democrat were in President Trump's shoes, but former GOP congressman Bob Inglis isn't buying it. In a tweet Friday morning, Inglis chided Ryan, writing, "You know this isn't true":

"you know this isn't true. You know that you would be inquiring into impeachment if this were a D."

When CNN's Jake Tapper retweeted Inglis' post insisting that Ryan "would be inquiring into impeachment" if a Democrat's conversations with a fired FBI director were the topic of a congressional hearing, Tapper noted that Inglis was once a Republican congressman. Inglis responded, reminding Tapper what else he once was: a member of the Judiciary Committee that voted to impeach former President Bill Clinton.

Inglis argued that Trump's case was worse than Clinton's:

"Yes, I was on Judiciary Cmte that impeached Clinton/sent him for trial in the Senate for matters less serious than the ones before us now."

Inglis, who represented South Carolina from 1993 to 1999 and 2005 to 2011, tweeted to Ryan that while it's not yet "time to draft articles of impeachment," it's certainly "time to pursue the Russia investigation with vigor."
==========================

[tkhayes 348]

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/obstruction_of_justice

that was not actually hard.

[rushmc 23]

tkhayes

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/obstruction_of_justice

that was not actually hard.

Ok. I know this is hard for you.
But I will try.

Obstruction is the act of trying to stop or influence a criminal investigation. What crime, where evidence has been provided, is being investigated?

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[yoink 321]

rushmc

***https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/obstruction_of_justice

that was not actually hard.

Ok. I know this is hard for you.
But I will try.

Obstruction is the act of trying to stop or influence a criminal investigation. What crime, where evidence has been provided, is being investigated?


You didn't even read the link, did you?

"A person obstructs justice when they have a specific intent to obstruct or interfere with a judicial proceeding."

Nothing, absolutely nothing to do with a criminal investigation.


This is a perfect example of rush in action. He has his beliefs - no matter how demonstrably wrong, and has absolutely no intention of even trying to read around them.

Facts and evidence have no place in his world. It's more important to reply than it is to be right.

[rushmc 23]

yoink

******https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/obstruction_of_justice

that was not actually hard.

Ok. I know this is hard for you.
But I will try.

Obstruction is the act of trying to stop or influence a criminal investigation. What crime, where evidence has been provided, is being investigated?


You didn't even read the link, did you?

"A person obstructs justice when they have a specific intent to obstruct or interfere with a judicial proceeding."

Nothing, absolutely nothing to do with a criminal investigation.


This is a perfect example of rush in action. He has his beliefs - no matter how demonstrably wrong, and has absolutely no intention of even trying to read around them.

Facts and evidence have no place in his world.

Ok

Then what judical proceding? We now know for sure Trump was not under investigation.

We also know know that he hasthe constitutional right to question any investigation.

So where are you going with this?

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln