normiss 893 #476 May 23, 2017 Now you'll get the panty and fake news comments. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #477 May 23, 2017 QuoteWho is have a great trip by the way. https://twitter.com/Mikel_Jollett/status/866778344599175168 Ron Dermer's reaction is priceless. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #478 May 23, 2017 SkyDekkerQuoteWas is just two years ago the US spent money and sent people to Israel to try and out Netanyahu? lol. From the guy who always wants to wait for evidence. The senate sub-committee that looked into this could find no evidence to back up this claim. Dude. That was learned from a government report."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,114 #479 May 23, 2017 The longer your angry denials get - the more rancorous your attempted insults become - the more your panic shows through. Not even the best efforts of FOX News, the alt-right media and the republicans combined will be able to hide the facts any more. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #480 May 23, 2017 rushmc***QuoteWas is just two years ago the US spent money and sent people to Israel to try and out Netanyahu? lol. From the guy who always wants to wait for evidence. The senate sub-committee that looked into this could find no evidence to back up this claim. Dude. That was learned from a government report. Perfect, post the government report. What the sub-committee found is that there was no evidence the $350,000 that was given to the non-profit by the State Department was used in the campaign. The sub-committee did indicate that there had been a lack of safe-guards put in place to prevent those funds from being used in the campaign. If you have evidence to the contrary, please do post. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #481 May 23, 2017 http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jul/12/obama-admin-sent-taxpayer-money-oust-netanyahu/"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #482 May 23, 2017 Yeah, that isn't the report. From the actual report: QuoteThe Subcommittee found no evidence that OneVoice spent grant funds to influence the 2015 Israeli elections. The actual report indicates that funds were used to build a social media platform. After the grants were finished, this platform was used by another organization V15, to try and influence the elections. The US did not send people to try and influence the elections. There is no evidence Obama instructed the State Department to do this. In the end your statement is wrong again. Like I told you last week, you seem unable to reach the accuracy of a stopped clock. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #483 May 23, 2017 http://www.cnsnews.com/blog/michael-w-chapman/state-dept-350k-group-built-campaign-structure-used-against-election-israels QuoteAccording to the U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations (PSI), the State Department gave $349,276 in U.S. taxpayer-funded grants to a political group in Israel to build a campaign operation, which subsequently was used to try to influence Israelis to vote against conservative Benjamin Netanyahu in the March 2015 election for prime minister.Quote"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,147 #484 May 23, 2017 rushmchttp://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jul/12/obama-admin-sent-taxpayer-money-oust-netanyahu/ Ah, the Moonie paper. Fits right in with Breitbart and Wattsup.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites billvon 3,114 #485 May 23, 2017 QuoteAccording to the U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations (PSI), the State Department gave $349,276 in U.S. taxpayer-funded grants to a political group in Israel to build a campaign operation, which subsequently was used to try to influence Israelis to vote against conservative Benjamin Netanyahu in the March 2015 election for prime minister. Correct. We gave them money to build a social media platform. That platform was subsequently used to try to influence a vote. Let's use a skydiving analogy. You sell a rig to a friend. He jumps with it for a while, then years later uses that rig to jump into a prison and help someone escape. What are you guilty of? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,147 #486 May 23, 2017 www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-brennan-russia-20170523-story.html Not an anonymous source.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites billvon 3,114 #487 May 23, 2017 >Not an anonymous source. Expect him to say "but there's no PROOF of collusion!" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rushmc 23 #488 May 23, 2017 billvon>Not an anonymous source. Expect him to say "but there's no PROOF of collusion!" I don't have to say it bill. You just did. There is no evidence of collusion. And there's also been statements by the government that Russian meddling did not affect the outcome of the election. Do you acknowledge that?"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites billvon 3,114 #489 May 24, 2017 Aaaand . . . Trump lawyers up. This should be fun. ============ Trump expected to retain private attorney By Jim Acosta and Erin Burnett, CNN 8:04 PM ET, Tue May 23, 2017 (CNN) - President Donald Trump is expected to hire attorney Marc Kasowitz to represent him on matters related to the inquiry into his campaign's alleged ties to Russia, according to a senior administration official and a person close to Trump. Kasowitz has represented Trump on a "wide range of litigation matters for over 15 years," according to the biography posted on the website for his firm, Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP. ============ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites airdvr 210 #490 May 24, 2017 WoW! He got a lawyer! Good thing lawyering up isn't a crime.Please don't dent the planet. Destinations by Roxanne Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rushmc 23 #491 May 24, 2017 billvonAaaand . . . Trump lawyers up. This should be fun. ============ Trump expected to retain private attorney By Jim Acosta and Erin Burnett, CNN 8:04 PM ET, Tue May 23, 2017 (CNN) - President Donald Trump is expected to hire attorney Marc Kasowitz to represent him on matters related to the inquiry into his campaign's alleged ties to Russia, according to a senior administration official and a person close to Trump. Kasowitz has represented Trump on a "wide range of litigation matters for over 15 years," according to the biography posted on the website for his firm, Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP. ============ Smart move as the loony left is moving away from the Russia thing and moving toward a process crime. Images of Scooter Libby..."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites DJL 235 #492 May 24, 2017 airdvrWoW! He got a lawyer! Good thing lawyering up isn't a crime. Creating jobs for hard working Americans."I encourage all awesome dangerous behavior." - Jeffro Fincher Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,147 #493 May 24, 2017 rushmc***>Not an anonymous source. Expect him to say "but there's no PROOF of collusion!" I don't have to say it bill. You just did. There is no evidence of collusion. And there's also been statements by the government that Russian meddling did not affect the outcome of the election. Do you acknowledge that? Strange as it may seem, the CIA does not share its evidence with me during an ongoing intelligence operation. The fact that the director states that there IS reason to believe collusion is good enough for most people who aren't emotionally attached to Trump like you are. "The CIA received intelligence last summer indicating Donald Trump’s campaign aides were in contact with Russian government officials, information that was worrisome enough to pass to the FBI for investigation, former CIA Director John Brennan said Tuesday." Your responses are getting increasingly shrill.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites ryoder 1,590 #494 May 24, 2017 More subpoenas for Flynn: http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/michael-flynn-risks-held-contempt-congress-senate-intelligence/story?id=47594971"There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites DJL 235 #495 May 24, 2017 kallend******>Not an anonymous source. Expect him to say "but there's no PROOF of collusion!" I don't have to say it bill. You just did. There is no evidence of collusion. And there's also been statements by the government that Russian meddling did not affect the outcome of the election. Do you acknowledge that? Strange as it may seem, the CIA does not share its evidence with me during an ongoing intelligence operation. The fact that the director states that there IS reason to believe collusion is good enough for most people who aren't emotionally attached to Trump like you are. "The CIA received intelligence last summer indicating Donald Trump’s campaign aides were in contact with Russian government officials, information that was worrisome enough to pass to the FBI for investigation, former CIA Director John Brennan said Tuesday." Your responses are getting increasingly shrill. Again RuskieMC, this investigation is becoming more about campaign staff and Trump attempting to hide communications that may have been absolutely fine. They need to stop that and let the investigation proceed. We know for a fact that the Russians were attempting to sway the election. We know there was communication with Trump's campaign. It's very important as part of this investigation that we know what those conversations were about. Is any of that so off the wall?"I encourage all awesome dangerous behavior." - Jeffro Fincher Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites billvon 3,114 #496 May 24, 2017 QuoteSmart move as the loony left is moving away from the Russia thing and moving toward a process crime. Images of Scooter Libby... H.R. Haldeman is probably a better example. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites billvon 3,114 #497 May 24, 2017 >More subpoenas for Flynn . . . Update - Immunity is definitely off the table. Richard Burr said that contempt charges would likely follow if Flynn doesn't do what he said he would do: "If in fact there is not a response, we will seek additional counsel advice on how to proceed forward. At the end of that option is a contempt charge and I've said that everything is on the table. That is not our preference today. We would like to hear from Gen. Flynn. We'd like to see his documents. We'd like him to tell his story because he publicly said 'I've got a story to tell.' We're allowing him that opportunity to do it." And even more subpoenas - but this time for his businesses. (Businesses can't plead the fifth.) Still, Flynn continues to demand immunity before he complies with the subpoena. (Remember, when you are given immunity, that means you have probably committed a crime.) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rushmc 23 #498 May 24, 2017 kallend ******>Not an anonymous source. Expect him to say "but there's no PROOF of collusion!" I don't have to say it bill. You just did. There is no evidence of collusion. And there's also been statements by the government that Russian meddling did not affect the outcome of the election. Do you acknowledge that? Strange as it may seem, the CIA does not share its evidence with me during an ongoing intelligence operation. The fact that the director states that there IS reason to believe collusion is good enough for most people who aren't emotionally attached to Trump like you are. "The CIA received intelligence last summer indicating Donald Trump’s campaign aides were in contact with Russian government officials, information that was worrisome enough to pass to the FBI for investigation, former CIA Director John Brennan said Tuesday." Your responses are getting increasingly shrill. That is a new tactic from you! Brennan also states Quote "Since you passed that information to the FBI director [in summer 2016], have you reviewed the FBI's development of that evidence or any other evidence?" asked Democratic Rep. Eric Swalwell. "I am unaware of what the bureau has done with that information, and I have no knowledge of anything, even, that the [CIA] has done since Jan. 20th," Brennan answered. But others do have knowledge of what the FBI has done with Brennan's information. The FBI has briefed members of the so-called "Gang of Eight" — that is, the top Republican and Democrat on both House and Senate intelligence committees plus the two leaders of each house of Congress — on developments in the case. The bureau has also briefed the top members of the Senate Judiciary Committee, as well. Dianne Feinstein, the Democratic senator from California who last year was vice chair of the Intelligence Committee, was part of the Gang of Eight until January of this year, and since then has been ranking Democrat on the Judiciary Committee. So she, unlike Brennan, has been kept up on what the FBI did with the information Brennan gave the bureau in the summer of 2016. In an appearance on CNN May 3, Feinstein noted that she had been briefed by the FBI and had also recently visited CIA headquarters to review documents. "Do you believe, do you have evidence that there was in fact collusion between Trump associates and Russia during the campaign," anchor Wolf Blitzer asked Feinstein. "Not at this time," Feinstein answered. Follow the whole story Bill."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites billvon 3,114 #499 May 24, 2017 >Follow the whole story Bill. You didn't cite the source of that, so I checked. It's Byron York - "Byron York is an American conservative columnist for the Washington Examiner and Fox News contributor." Looks like he yanked, and the ring in your nose followed his lead dutifully. No wonder you didn't want us to know who's leading you around by the nose. By the way, I love his take on Russiagate - "Trump may have colluded with Russia but it doesn't matter." Will that be the next opinion you regurgitate? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rushmc 23 #500 May 24, 2017 billvon >Follow the whole story Bill. You didn't cite the source of that, so I checked. It's Byron York - "Byron York is an American conservative columnist for the Washington Examiner and Fox News contributor." Looks like he yanked, and the ring in your nose followed his lead dutifully. No wonder you didn't want us to know who's leading you around by the nose. By the way, I love his take on Russiagate - "Trump may have colluded with Russia but it doesn't matter." Will that be the next opinion you regurgitate? You got my take wrong but then that is nothing new. At this point I do not think Trump colluded with anyone. This is just the story that Hilary cooked up after she lost and you and the media are running with it. No evidence Bill. Zero, zilch, nada. You are just projecting here yet again as you follow the media narrative. Oh And you do it very well "America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Next Page 20 of 199 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 2 2
kallend 2,147 #484 May 23, 2017 rushmchttp://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jul/12/obama-admin-sent-taxpayer-money-oust-netanyahu/ Ah, the Moonie paper. Fits right in with Breitbart and Wattsup.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,114 #485 May 23, 2017 QuoteAccording to the U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations (PSI), the State Department gave $349,276 in U.S. taxpayer-funded grants to a political group in Israel to build a campaign operation, which subsequently was used to try to influence Israelis to vote against conservative Benjamin Netanyahu in the March 2015 election for prime minister. Correct. We gave them money to build a social media platform. That platform was subsequently used to try to influence a vote. Let's use a skydiving analogy. You sell a rig to a friend. He jumps with it for a while, then years later uses that rig to jump into a prison and help someone escape. What are you guilty of? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,147 #486 May 23, 2017 www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-brennan-russia-20170523-story.html Not an anonymous source.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,114 #487 May 23, 2017 >Not an anonymous source. Expect him to say "but there's no PROOF of collusion!" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #488 May 23, 2017 billvon>Not an anonymous source. Expect him to say "but there's no PROOF of collusion!" I don't have to say it bill. You just did. There is no evidence of collusion. And there's also been statements by the government that Russian meddling did not affect the outcome of the election. Do you acknowledge that?"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,114 #489 May 24, 2017 Aaaand . . . Trump lawyers up. This should be fun. ============ Trump expected to retain private attorney By Jim Acosta and Erin Burnett, CNN 8:04 PM ET, Tue May 23, 2017 (CNN) - President Donald Trump is expected to hire attorney Marc Kasowitz to represent him on matters related to the inquiry into his campaign's alleged ties to Russia, according to a senior administration official and a person close to Trump. Kasowitz has represented Trump on a "wide range of litigation matters for over 15 years," according to the biography posted on the website for his firm, Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP. ============ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
airdvr 210 #490 May 24, 2017 WoW! He got a lawyer! Good thing lawyering up isn't a crime.Please don't dent the planet. Destinations by Roxanne Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #491 May 24, 2017 billvonAaaand . . . Trump lawyers up. This should be fun. ============ Trump expected to retain private attorney By Jim Acosta and Erin Burnett, CNN 8:04 PM ET, Tue May 23, 2017 (CNN) - President Donald Trump is expected to hire attorney Marc Kasowitz to represent him on matters related to the inquiry into his campaign's alleged ties to Russia, according to a senior administration official and a person close to Trump. Kasowitz has represented Trump on a "wide range of litigation matters for over 15 years," according to the biography posted on the website for his firm, Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP. ============ Smart move as the loony left is moving away from the Russia thing and moving toward a process crime. Images of Scooter Libby..."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DJL 235 #492 May 24, 2017 airdvrWoW! He got a lawyer! Good thing lawyering up isn't a crime. Creating jobs for hard working Americans."I encourage all awesome dangerous behavior." - Jeffro Fincher Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,147 #493 May 24, 2017 rushmc***>Not an anonymous source. Expect him to say "but there's no PROOF of collusion!" I don't have to say it bill. You just did. There is no evidence of collusion. And there's also been statements by the government that Russian meddling did not affect the outcome of the election. Do you acknowledge that? Strange as it may seem, the CIA does not share its evidence with me during an ongoing intelligence operation. The fact that the director states that there IS reason to believe collusion is good enough for most people who aren't emotionally attached to Trump like you are. "The CIA received intelligence last summer indicating Donald Trump’s campaign aides were in contact with Russian government officials, information that was worrisome enough to pass to the FBI for investigation, former CIA Director John Brennan said Tuesday." Your responses are getting increasingly shrill.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,590 #494 May 24, 2017 More subpoenas for Flynn: http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/michael-flynn-risks-held-contempt-congress-senate-intelligence/story?id=47594971"There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DJL 235 #495 May 24, 2017 kallend******>Not an anonymous source. Expect him to say "but there's no PROOF of collusion!" I don't have to say it bill. You just did. There is no evidence of collusion. And there's also been statements by the government that Russian meddling did not affect the outcome of the election. Do you acknowledge that? Strange as it may seem, the CIA does not share its evidence with me during an ongoing intelligence operation. The fact that the director states that there IS reason to believe collusion is good enough for most people who aren't emotionally attached to Trump like you are. "The CIA received intelligence last summer indicating Donald Trump’s campaign aides were in contact with Russian government officials, information that was worrisome enough to pass to the FBI for investigation, former CIA Director John Brennan said Tuesday." Your responses are getting increasingly shrill. Again RuskieMC, this investigation is becoming more about campaign staff and Trump attempting to hide communications that may have been absolutely fine. They need to stop that and let the investigation proceed. We know for a fact that the Russians were attempting to sway the election. We know there was communication with Trump's campaign. It's very important as part of this investigation that we know what those conversations were about. Is any of that so off the wall?"I encourage all awesome dangerous behavior." - Jeffro Fincher Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,114 #496 May 24, 2017 QuoteSmart move as the loony left is moving away from the Russia thing and moving toward a process crime. Images of Scooter Libby... H.R. Haldeman is probably a better example. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,114 #497 May 24, 2017 >More subpoenas for Flynn . . . Update - Immunity is definitely off the table. Richard Burr said that contempt charges would likely follow if Flynn doesn't do what he said he would do: "If in fact there is not a response, we will seek additional counsel advice on how to proceed forward. At the end of that option is a contempt charge and I've said that everything is on the table. That is not our preference today. We would like to hear from Gen. Flynn. We'd like to see his documents. We'd like him to tell his story because he publicly said 'I've got a story to tell.' We're allowing him that opportunity to do it." And even more subpoenas - but this time for his businesses. (Businesses can't plead the fifth.) Still, Flynn continues to demand immunity before he complies with the subpoena. (Remember, when you are given immunity, that means you have probably committed a crime.) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #498 May 24, 2017 kallend ******>Not an anonymous source. Expect him to say "but there's no PROOF of collusion!" I don't have to say it bill. You just did. There is no evidence of collusion. And there's also been statements by the government that Russian meddling did not affect the outcome of the election. Do you acknowledge that? Strange as it may seem, the CIA does not share its evidence with me during an ongoing intelligence operation. The fact that the director states that there IS reason to believe collusion is good enough for most people who aren't emotionally attached to Trump like you are. "The CIA received intelligence last summer indicating Donald Trump’s campaign aides were in contact with Russian government officials, information that was worrisome enough to pass to the FBI for investigation, former CIA Director John Brennan said Tuesday." Your responses are getting increasingly shrill. That is a new tactic from you! Brennan also states Quote "Since you passed that information to the FBI director [in summer 2016], have you reviewed the FBI's development of that evidence or any other evidence?" asked Democratic Rep. Eric Swalwell. "I am unaware of what the bureau has done with that information, and I have no knowledge of anything, even, that the [CIA] has done since Jan. 20th," Brennan answered. But others do have knowledge of what the FBI has done with Brennan's information. The FBI has briefed members of the so-called "Gang of Eight" — that is, the top Republican and Democrat on both House and Senate intelligence committees plus the two leaders of each house of Congress — on developments in the case. The bureau has also briefed the top members of the Senate Judiciary Committee, as well. Dianne Feinstein, the Democratic senator from California who last year was vice chair of the Intelligence Committee, was part of the Gang of Eight until January of this year, and since then has been ranking Democrat on the Judiciary Committee. So she, unlike Brennan, has been kept up on what the FBI did with the information Brennan gave the bureau in the summer of 2016. In an appearance on CNN May 3, Feinstein noted that she had been briefed by the FBI and had also recently visited CIA headquarters to review documents. "Do you believe, do you have evidence that there was in fact collusion between Trump associates and Russia during the campaign," anchor Wolf Blitzer asked Feinstein. "Not at this time," Feinstein answered. Follow the whole story Bill."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,114 #499 May 24, 2017 >Follow the whole story Bill. You didn't cite the source of that, so I checked. It's Byron York - "Byron York is an American conservative columnist for the Washington Examiner and Fox News contributor." Looks like he yanked, and the ring in your nose followed his lead dutifully. No wonder you didn't want us to know who's leading you around by the nose. By the way, I love his take on Russiagate - "Trump may have colluded with Russia but it doesn't matter." Will that be the next opinion you regurgitate? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #500 May 24, 2017 billvon >Follow the whole story Bill. You didn't cite the source of that, so I checked. It's Byron York - "Byron York is an American conservative columnist for the Washington Examiner and Fox News contributor." Looks like he yanked, and the ring in your nose followed his lead dutifully. No wonder you didn't want us to know who's leading you around by the nose. By the way, I love his take on Russiagate - "Trump may have colluded with Russia but it doesn't matter." Will that be the next opinion you regurgitate? You got my take wrong but then that is nothing new. At this point I do not think Trump colluded with anyone. This is just the story that Hilary cooked up after she lost and you and the media are running with it. No evidence Bill. Zero, zilch, nada. You are just projecting here yet again as you follow the media narrative. Oh And you do it very well "America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
.thumb.jpg.4bb795e2eaf21b8b300039a5e1ec7f92.jpg)