America First Energy Policy

[brenthutch 444]

Splain it to me all powerful moderator.

[wmw999 2,589]

Quote

Getting rich on OPM

I think that's how business works, isn't it? If you only sell to yourself, you won't do very well.

Wendy P.

There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown)

[brenthutch 444]

Speculating with other people's money.
Unlike Trump's private equity investors, Elon Musk's taxpayer "investors" don't have a choice and receive no dividend.

[kallend 2,150]

brenthutch

I will type slowly...

Indeed, your posts generally indicate a disconnect between brain and fingers.

...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

[kallend 2,150]

brenthutch

I never mentioned commercial trucks, anymore than I mentioned M1 tanks on our highways..

You wrote "big trucks".

As I wrote before, your concept of "big" wouldn't impress most women.

...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

[brenthutch 444]

kallend

***I never mentioned commercial trucks, anymore than I mentioned M1 tanks on our highways..

You wrote "big trucks."

As I wrote before, your concept of "big" wouldn't impress most women.

No Junebug, I wrote "big-truck guys." "Guys" is the subject "big-truck" is the modifier. It is a little something I like to call grammar. It Is disappointing to see you reduced to "size" jokes, I thought you were a grown man. Obviously I was mistaken.

[billvon 3,120]

>Splain it to me all powerful moderator.

Sure. From Airdvr's post:

"All so over priveleged douchebags can have an electric toy." - a stupid, inaccurate generalization.

I replied with:

"And guys with small penises - and low IQ's - can buy big trucks!" - an example of another stupid, inaccurate generalization.

Then, lest anyone miss the point there, I added another one:

"And rich assholes can launch stupid satellites." - an example of an even stupider, inaccurate generalization.

This is a comparison, where several concepts are presented to allow readers to compare them. It is indeed sad that so many people here can read even one of those three and think "yeah, damn straight!"

[brenthutch 444]

I am not Airdiver, I am not RushMC. Hold me accountable for what I write and I will reciprocate.

[billvon 3,120]

>I am not Airdiver, I am not RushMC. Hold me accountable for what I write and
>I will reciprocate.

Then why were you talking about a reply I made to Airdiver? You can't have it both ways.

[kallend 2,150]

brenthutch

******I never mentioned commercial trucks, anymore than I mentioned M1 tanks on our highways..

You wrote "big trucks."

As I wrote before, your concept of "big" wouldn't impress most women.

No Junebug, I wrote "big-truck guys." "Guys" is the subject "big-truck" is the modifier. It is a little something I like to call grammar. It Is disappointing to see you reduced to "size" jokes, I thought you were a grown man. Obviously I was mistaken.

How "big" are your hands?

...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

[brenthutch 444]

billvon

>I am not Airdiver, I am not RushMC. Hold me accountable for what I write and
>I will reciprocate.

Then why were you talking about a reply I made to Airdiver?

Because you made it. I did not hold you to account for someone else's words they were your words.

"guys with small penises - and low IQ's - can buy big trucks!"
BillV

[jakee 1,596]

brenthutch

***>I am not Airdiver, I am not RushMC. Hold me accountable for what I write and
>I will reciprocate.

Then why were you talking about a reply I made to Airdiver?

Because you made it. I did not hold you to account for someone else's words they were your words.

"guys with small penises - and low IQ's - can buy big trucks!"
BillV

You do realise how petty you're making yourself look here, don't you?

Trying to play this stupid point-scoring game (and having to make such obvious contortions and intentional misunderstandings to do so) not only distracts from your main points which actually do have some merit, they destroy your overall credibility as a person worth continuing a conversation with.

Do you want to have an ideagasm?

[airdvr 210]

Bill, did you buy a Tesla?

Please don't dent the planet.

Destinations by Roxanne

[brenthutch 444]

Actually you are right. I made some points and backed the up, the counter was low IQs and small dicks. I allowed myself to get sucked into petty point scoring, as you correctly point out. Thanks for the sanity check.

[jakee 1,596]

brenthutch

Actually you are right. I made some points and backed the up, the counter was low IQs and small dicks.

Umm, no it wasn't. As was just pointed out that counter was made to Airdvr, not you. And since, as you just pointed out you should not be held accountable for what Airdvr said, you should equally not treat replies to Airdvr's posts as replies to your posts.

Once again, that's the kind of contortion that detracts from your own argument.

Do you want to have an ideagasm?

[brenthutch 444]

fo·rum
ˈfôrəm/
noun
1.
a place, meeting, or medium where ideas and views on a particular issue can be exchanged.

I shared my thoughts on Bill's post to Airdiver.

[jakee 1,596]

You said it was a counter to your points. It was not a counter to your points, unless you want to own Airdvr's statements. You can't have it both ways.

Look, I tried to help you. You wanna keep playing in the mud, keep playing in the mud.

Do you want to have an ideagasm?

[billvon 3,120]

>I shared my thoughts on Bill's post to Airdiver.

And I explained your misunderstanding on said forum.

[billvon 3,120]

>Bill, did you buy a Tesla?

Yes, a few months ago. Got a deal I couldn't refuse.

[airdvr 210]

How dare you blow up my "over privileged douchebag " theory.

Please don't dent the planet.

Destinations by Roxanne

[wolfriverjoe 1,523]

jakee

******>I am not Airdiver, I am not RushMC. Hold me accountable for what I write and
>I will reciprocate.

Then why were you talking about a reply I made to Airdiver?

Because you made it. I did not hold you to account for someone else's words they were your words.

"guys with small penises - and low IQ's - can buy big trucks!"
BillV

You do realise how petty you're making yourself look here, don't you?

Trying to play this stupid point-scoring game (and having to make such obvious contortions and intentional misunderstandings to do so) not only distracts from your main points which actually do have some merit, they destroy your overall credibility as a person worth continuing a conversation with.

Ummmm...

You do realize that that is his standard behavior on here, right?

"There are NO situations which do not call for a French Maid outfit." Lucky McSwervy

"~ya don't GET old by being weak & stupid!" - Airtwardo

[jakee 1,596]

wolfriverjoe

You do realize that that is his standard behavior on here, right?

I guess I was just overcome by a wave of uncharacteristic optimism. Doubt it'll happen again anytime soon.

Do you want to have an ideagasm?

[brenthutch 444]

When people deny facts and logic, there is really no where else to go.

[headoverheels 334]

billvon

>All so over priveleged douchebags can have an electric toy.

And guys with small penises - and low IQ's - can buy big trucks! And rich assholes can launch stupid satellites. Ain't freedom great?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ADEGQqfwLaY

[kallend 2,150]

headoverheels

***>All so over priveleged douchebags can have an electric toy.

And guys with small penises - and low IQ's - can buy big trucks! AND GUNS. And rich assholes can launch stupid satellites. Ain't freedom great?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ADEGQqfwLaY

...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.