RonD1120 62 #1 September 14, 2016 For those interested in the corruption in the Clinton Foundation, here is a journalistic investigator that is of interest. Basically, Charles Ortel has revealed the fraud in the organization. http://charlesortel.com/Look for the shiny things of God revealed by the Holy Spirit. They only last for an instant but it is a Holy Instant. Let your soul absorb them. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
winsor 236 #2 September 14, 2016 RonD1120For those interested in the corruption in the Clinton Foundation, here is a journalistic investigator that is of interest. Basically, Charles Ortel has revealed the fraud in the organization. http://charlesortel.com/ Somehow I took the corruption of the Foundation to be rather a given. Some pundit or another reported that the balance sheet showed some $9 million going to actual charity recipients from over $150 million received. Of the moneys spent, it was largely mismanaged to the point of futility; apparently all the efforts at relief in Haiti, for example, had zero net benefit for those in desperate need. The tenor of a charity run by a pair of Ivy League lawyers turned politicians (of any stripe) is predictable. The Foundation is corrupt. Dog bites man. What else is new? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,596 #3 September 14, 2016 QuoteSome pundit or another reported that the balance sheet showed some $9 million going to actual charity recipients from over $150 million received. But does it?Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #4 September 14, 2016 jakeeQuoteSome pundit or another reported that the balance sheet showed some $9 million going to actual charity recipients from over $150 million received. But does it? Who the fuck cares? He already indicates it matches his original belief, so it must be true. And now the Trump foundation is under investigation. But that is just politics, Clinton is a criminal. America has collectively lost it mind. Brexit fever is contagious. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
winsor 236 #5 September 14, 2016 SkyDekker***QuoteSome pundit or another reported that the balance sheet showed some $9 million going to actual charity recipients from over $150 million received. But does it? Who the fuck cares? He already indicates it matches his original belief, so it must be true. And now the Trump foundation is under investigation. But that is just politics, Clinton is a criminal. America has collectively lost it mind. Brexit fever is contagious. Okay, so Trump and both Clintons are sleazy sociopaths, and only an idiot would trust any of them. If one side points out what scum is the other side, I could not agree more. I am not sticking up for either. The enemy of my enemy is often every bit as bad - or worse. This election if rather a matter of 'name your poison.' Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,151 #6 September 14, 2016 winsor The enemy of my enemy is often every bit as bad - or worse. Rather like Syria and Iraq.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,151 #7 September 14, 2016 And then there's this. From a reputable source.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nolhtairt 0 #8 September 14, 2016 winsor******QuoteSome pundit or another reported that the balance sheet showed some $9 million going to actual charity recipients from over $150 million received. But does it? Who the fuck cares? He already indicates it matches his original belief, so it must be true. And now the Trump foundation is under investigation. But that is just politics, Clinton is a criminal. America has collectively lost it mind. Brexit fever is contagious. Okay, so Trump and both Clintons are sleazy sociopaths, and only an idiot would trust any of them. If one side points out what scum is the other side, I could not agree more. I am not sticking up for either. The enemy of my enemy is often every bit as bad - or worse. This election if rather a matter of 'name your poison.' Yep, its like choosing between a fried turd on a stick and a shit sandwich. You're fucked either way. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #9 September 14, 2016 winsor******QuoteSome pundit or another reported that the balance sheet showed some $9 million going to actual charity recipients from over $150 million received. But does it? Who the fuck cares? He already indicates it matches his original belief, so it must be true. And now the Trump foundation is under investigation. But that is just politics, Clinton is a criminal. America has collectively lost it mind. Brexit fever is contagious. Okay, so Trump and both Clintons are sleazy sociopaths, and only an idiot would trust any of them. If one side points out what scum is the other side, I could not agree more. I am not sticking up for either. The enemy of my enemy is often every bit as bad - or worse. This election if rather a matter of 'name your poison.' Right. Which doesn't address the point made at all. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DrSher 0 #10 September 14, 2016 The only thing that should matter for the next president is not to pick someone who will take us into WW3. Hillary lives in the utopian world of "containing Russia"; "containing ISIS" and "no fly zones", while the world has caught fire everywhere she goes. I agree that Trump has little foreign experience in politics (yet), but how much that has been helping politicians to begin with is a question. There is still lots of time to learn it.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #11 September 14, 2016 QuoteI agree that Trump has little foreign experience in politics (yet), but how much that has been helping politicians to begin with is a question. lol QuoteThe only thing that should matter for the next president is not to pick someone who will take us into WW3 Yes like maybe agree with everything Russia does. Maybe you can vote for a President with unknown foreign ties, has praised Russia's "President" and agrees with his strong leadership. Leadership that generally includes executing those whom do not agree with you. Yes, that's a great choice. Very smart! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
winsor 236 #12 September 14, 2016 SkyDekker*********QuoteSome pundit or another reported that the balance sheet showed some $9 million going to actual charity recipients from over $150 million received. But does it? Who the fuck cares? He already indicates it matches his original belief, so it must be true. And now the Trump foundation is under investigation. But that is just politics, Clinton is a criminal. America has collectively lost it mind. Brexit fever is contagious. Okay, so Trump and both Clintons are sleazy sociopaths, and only an idiot would trust any of them. If one side points out what scum is the other side, I could not agree more. I am not sticking up for either. The enemy of my enemy is often every bit as bad - or worse. This election if rather a matter of 'name your poison.' Right. Which doesn't address the point made at all. That's okay - I missed it entirely. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 898 #13 September 14, 2016 He's also ready to use the nuclear weapons and steal assets from other nations. Great guy, believe me. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #14 September 14, 2016 I doubt it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
winsor 236 #15 September 14, 2016 SkyDekkerI doubt it. If it's important, please reiterate. I most certainly could not restate it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,120 #16 September 14, 2016 QuoteHillary lives in the utopian world of "containing Russia"; "containing ISIS" and "no fly zones", while the world has caught fire everywhere she goes. Whereas Trump admits that he loves war, regularly advocates violence, doesn't understand our nuclear defenses but wants to know why he can't use them, and has stated that he would start a shooting war with a country if they made rude hand gestures at us. He sees no problem with violence; he asks his supporters to has stated he could shoot someone in Manhattan and not lose any support. He has stated that "we need a little bit more" violence at his rallies, and asks his supporters to "knock the hell" out of protesters. He even promised to pay their legal fees - if, for some inexplicable reason, such people are prosecuted for battery. I would prefer no more wars. But if the choice is another Libya or a nuclear war with China, I'll take Libya any day. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gowlerk 2,277 #17 September 15, 2016 It is very hard for me to believe that a Commander in Chief Trump would give more than cursory consideration to the dangers faced by American troops before he placed them in harms way.Always remember the brave children who died defending your right to bear arms. Freedom is not free. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites