turtlespeed 226 #1 May 8, 2016 I believe that between the Bush admin and Obama admin that the existence of Trump as a candidate is a mix between the Clintons and the Bush's administrations. What say you? Oh, and mostly just Hillary.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skymiles 3 #2 May 8, 2016 According to this article, Fox News is responsible. Good read. http://www.salon.com/2016/04/08/spreading_hate_has_backfired_on_right_wing_media_how_fox_news_unwittingly_destroyed_the_republican_party/ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bolas 5 #3 May 8, 2016 skymiles According to this article, Fox News is responsible. Good read. http://www.salon.com/2016/04/08/spreading_hate_has_backfired_on_right_wing_media_how_fox_news_unwittingly_destroyed_the_republican_party/ He Godwined his own article. Stupidity if left untreated is self-correcting If ya can't be good, look good, if that fails, make 'em laugh. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,151 #4 May 8, 2016 I refer you to my post from some time ago: www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=4785033#4785033... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #5 May 8, 2016 Ultimately? I blame the Reagan administration for destroying the Fairness Doctrine. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairness_Doctrine#Revocation That set the stage for Rush Limbaugh and all the others who came after him including Fox News. Once the Fairness Doctrine was removed, talking head blowholes took over and found their audiences by creating fake divisiveness which was unseen before. They tapped into the great idiocracy and Trump was the logical conclusion.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Coreeece 2 #6 May 8, 2016 Damn, free speech strikes again. . .Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #7 May 8, 2016 CoreeeceDamn, free speech strikes again. . . You're missing the point, as usual. Free Speech is fine. Hogging the mic on a 50,000 watt clear channel station is something a little different. Monopolizing the airwaves with a network of such stations all controlled by the same interest is even worse. With the Fairness Doctrine, Free Speech was available to all. Without it, it's available to those with the capitol to invest in media companies. It's no longer free for all. Only free to the oligarchy.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,120 #8 May 8, 2016 >Damn, free speech strikes again. . . The loss of the fairness doctrine was a blow to free speech. It resulted in unpopular speech being suppressed. The result? FOX News (among other things) and the birth of the echo chamber. If our modern media is what you would describe as "free speech" then . . . well, you probably enjoy it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Coreeece 2 #9 May 8, 2016 quade Monopolizing the airwaves Liberal media, TV, movies, Hollywood, advertising, etc. . . You're being utterly biased - as usual.Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Coreeece 2 #10 May 8, 2016 Biased, as usual, as well. . . You guys bitch about Fox News, Fox News, Fox News - and then there's everything else, which is practically liberal.Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #11 May 8, 2016 CoreeeceYou guys bitch about Fox News, Fox News, Fox News - and then there's everything else, which is practically liberal. Please name the "liberal" CEOs or owners of "everything else." Go ahead. I'll wait. You have fallen hook, line, and sinker for the mythology that "everything else" is run by "liberals." It's total fiction. I'll admit there are a number of celebrities who are "liberal," but the owners of the media companies they work for, by and large, are not. They're pretty much all highly conservative businessmen concerned with making a buck.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RonD1120 62 #12 May 8, 2016 It amuses me, these critics can't seem to grasp the reason why the majority of the radio listeners and TV watchers choose the way they do.Look for the shiny things of God revealed by the Holy Spirit. They only last for an instant but it is a Holy Instant. Let your soul absorb them. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Coreeece 2 #13 May 8, 2016 quade***You guys bitch about Fox News, Fox News, Fox News - and then there's everything else, which is practically liberal. Please name the "liberal" CEOs or owners of "everything else." Go ahead. I'll wait. Please show me the conservative content of "everything else" since thats what actually matters. Go ahead. I'll wait.Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #14 May 8, 2016 Coreeece******You guys bitch about Fox News, Fox News, Fox News - and then there's everything else, which is practically liberal. Please name the "liberal" CEOs or owners of "everything else." Go ahead. I'll wait. Please show me the conservative content of "everything else" since thats what actually matters. Go ahead. I'll wait. What a wimp. Can't even back up your bogus claims and resorts to simply parroting. So sad.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Coreeece 2 #15 May 8, 2016 quade*********You guys bitch about Fox News, Fox News, Fox News - and then there's everything else, which is practically liberal. Please name the "liberal" CEOs or owners of "everything else." Go ahead. I'll wait. Please show me the conservative content of "everything else" since thats what actually matters. Go ahead. I'll wait. What a wimp. Can't even back up your bogus claims and resorts to simply parroting. So sad. Nonsense - you changed the goal posts and started talking about the owners, when this discussion was about the content. I never made a claim about the owners. Then you resort to ad hom PAs, as usual.Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #16 May 8, 2016 CoreeeceNonsense - you changed the goal posts and started talking about the owners, when this discussion was about the content. I never made a claim about the owners. Who do you think I was talking about when I said oligarchy? I have been talking about ownership since my first post in this thread. I can't help it if you didn't understand that.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Coreeece 2 #17 May 8, 2016 You singled out Rush Limbo and Fox News while intentionally ignoring the content of everything else. Content is what matters here, not capitalistic owners that couldn't care less about the content as long as it brings them a buck. You're being disingenuous, as usual.Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #18 May 8, 2016 CoreeeceYou singled out Rush Limbo and Fox News while intentionally ignoring the content of everything else. Content is what matters here, not capitalistic owners that couldn't care less about the content as long as it brings them a buck. You're being disingenuous, as usual. The thread is about Trump and what lead the country to this point. I've outlined the root cause of divisiveness directly back through the far right to Reagan. The far right created him. I'm sorry you can't follow that, but it's as clear glass what lead to this.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Coreeece 2 #19 May 8, 2016 quade "I can't help it if you didn't understand" "I'm sorry you can't follow that" "What a wimp." "it's as clear glass what lead to this." It's the divisiveness of condescending blowhards that get off on calling people wimps that lead to this, like Trump. ...people like you.Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #20 May 8, 2016 Dude, if you're complaining about being called a wimp. Geebus. Grow a pair.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Coreeece 2 #21 May 8, 2016 No, its the hypocrisy.Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #22 May 8, 2016 CoreeeceNo, its the hypocrisy. Sir, you are delusional about many things. You entered this conversation without any regard whatsoever for what was being said. You simply wanted to be a contrarian to whatever position I was taking. When it comes to hypocrisy, I think you need to look in the mirror before accusing anyone else. Ditch your persecution complex and, as I've said already, grow a pair.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Coreeece 2 #23 May 8, 2016 ***Sir, you are delusional about many things. grow a pair. And he continues like a bully with the pot shots with my hands tied behind my back, less he ban be for another month. Must be nice when the rules don't apply to you, eh? ***You entered this conversation without any regard whatsoever for what was being said. You simply wanted to be a contrarian to whatever position I was taking. Nonsense. I posted 5 words and you got all into your own head about it and became defensive.Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,151 #24 May 8, 2016 RonD1120It amuses me, these critics can't seem to grasp the reason why the majority of the radio listeners and TV watchers choose the way they do. They do it because it's more comfortable to listen to lies you agree with than truths that you disagree with.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RonD1120 62 #25 May 9, 2016 kallend***It amuses me, these critics can't seem to grasp the reason why the majority of the radio listeners and TV watchers choose the way they do. They do it because it's more comfortable to listen to lies you agree with than truths lies that you disagree with. IMOLook for the shiny things of God revealed by the Holy Spirit. They only last for an instant but it is a Holy Instant. Let your soul absorb them. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites