normiss 892 #101 April 27, 2016 Intentionally. Just like the last time a misspelling was pointed out. Lots of S's in here. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DanG 1 #102 April 27, 2016 Sure it was intentional, buddy. Sure. - Dan G Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,146 #104 April 27, 2016 brenthutch Still can't bring yourself to explaine your initial response to my OP. The response (post #2, this thread) that did NOT mention either El Nino or CO2 levels, nor did it cite an article that mentioned them. YOU, BRENTHUTCH, were the first to bring up those topics. Apparently scrolling back through the thread is too challenging for you.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brenthutch 444 #105 April 27, 2016 kallend ***Still can't bring yourself to explaine your initial response to my OP. The response (post #2, this thread) that did NOT mention either El Nino or CO2 levels, nor did it cite an article that mentioned them. YOU, BRENTHUTCH, were the first to bring up those topics. Apparently scrolling back through the thread is too challenging for you. Still can't bring yourself to explain your initial response to my OP. Was it a mistake? Did you intend to start a thread of your own? That would explain the non sequitur. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,146 #106 April 27, 2016 brenthutch ******Still can't bring yourself to explaine your initial response to my OP. The response (post #2, this thread) that did NOT mention either El Nino or CO2 levels, nor did it cite an article that mentioned them. YOU, BRENTHUTCH, were the first to bring up those topics. Apparently scrolling back through the thread is too challenging for you. Still can't bring yourself to explain your initial response to my OP. Was it a mistake? Did you intend to start a thread of your own? That would explain the non sequitur. Only a non-sequitur to someone who chooses not to think when thinking would challenge their beliefs. I'm sure everyone except rushmc and you could follow.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brenthutch 444 #107 April 27, 2016 Still waiting..... The response to the OP about the moral superiority of fossil fuels is a link to an article about coral bleaching from warm water and has nothing to do with CO2??? It is nice to see that you have finally come to your senses with regard to AGW, welcome aboard. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,146 #108 April 28, 2016 brenthutchStill waiting..... The response to the OP about the moral superiority of fossil fuels is a link to an article about coral bleaching from warm water and has nothing to do with CO2??? It is nice to see that you have finally come to your senses with regard to AGW, welcome aboard. Another strawman (look it up since you've shown that you don't know the definition). Your reading comprehension is sadly deficient.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brenthutch 444 #109 April 28, 2016 Still waiting....... Your inability/reluctance to respond speaks volumes. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,146 #110 April 28, 2016 Your deliberate lack of comprehension is not my problem.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gowlerk 2,275 #111 April 28, 2016 brenthutchStill waiting....... Your inability/reluctance to respond speaks volumes. I responded in post #3. 'nuff said. No reason for any of us to follow you down the rabbit hole into wonderland.Always remember the brave children who died defending your right to bear arms. Freedom is not free. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brenthutch 444 #112 April 28, 2016 Not true, Kallend said nothing about CO2. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gowlerk 2,275 #113 April 28, 2016 brenthutchNot true, Kallend said nothing about CO2. It's kinda fun watching you twist. Carry on.Always remember the brave children who died defending your right to bear arms. Freedom is not free. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #114 April 28, 2016 brenthutchStill waiting....... Your inability/reluctance to respond speaks volumes. No really. it has been explained a couple of times now. I think your continued asking is what speaks volumes. Hey Rush, nice logic on the research grants, that's some bright thinking. Keep it up! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brenthutch 444 #115 April 28, 2016 SkyDekker ***Still waiting....... Your inability/reluctance to respond speaks volumes. No really. it has been explained a couple of times now. Then it should be easy to site just one example. But you won't, because you can't. Instead you will respond with a weak, pathetic ad hominem attack. Not one word about the substance of the OP in five pages of discussion. Red herrings about bleached corals, melting glaciers, spelling critiques, PAs on everyone from me to the committee chair, but nothing on topic and that makes me sad Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #116 April 28, 2016 brenthutch ******Still waiting....... Your inability/reluctance to respond speaks volumes. No really. it has been explained a couple of times now. Then it should be easy to site just one example. But you won't, because you can't. Instead you will respond with a weak, pathetic ad hominem attack. Not one word about the substance of the OP in five pages of discussion. Red herrings about bleached corals, melting glaciers, spelling critiques, PAs on everyone from me to the committee chair, but nothing on topic and that makes me sadMaybe I can find an article that doesn't agree with my position and post it as proof that I am right. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #117 April 29, 2016 DanGQuoteFirst, mispeellings, again. Isn't there a rule about criticizing someone else's spelling or grammar? Nope"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wolfriverjoe 1,523 #118 April 29, 2016 DanGQuoteFirst, mispeellings, again. Isn't there a rule about criticizing someone else's spelling or grammar? Skitt's Law Not about doing it (or not doing it), but about what happens when you do it."There are NO situations which do not call for a French Maid outfit." Lucky McSwervy "~ya don't GET old by being weak & stupid!" - Airtwardo Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,111 #119 April 29, 2016 >Maybe I can find an article that doesn't agree with my position and post it as proof that I am right. Just make sure you don't read it first. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites