ryoder 1,590 #1 April 7, 2016 http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/politics/political-pulse/os-shacking-up-legal-scott-signs-bill-story.html “If any man and woman, not being married to each other, lewdly and lasciviously associate and cohabit together ... they shall be guilty of a second degree misdemeanor,” the former law stated. Damn! When they put it like that, it sounded like a hell of a lot of fun!"There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gowlerk 2,275 #2 April 7, 2016 ryoder http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/politics/political-pulse/os-shacking-up-legal-scott-signs-bill-story.html “If any man and woman, not being married to each other, lewdly and lasciviously associate and cohabit together ... they shall be guilty of a second degree misdemeanor,” the former law stated. Damn! When they put it like that, it sounded like a hell of a lot of fun! I interpret that as meaning only gay sex is legal if you are unmarried.Always remember the brave children who died defending your right to bear arms. Freedom is not free. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JohnnyMarko 1 #3 April 7, 2016 I've committed a lot of second degree misdemeanors over the last 5 years. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JerryBaumchen 1,466 #4 April 7, 2016 Hi Robert, QuoteWhen they put it like that, it sounded like a hell of a lot of fun! From your link: 'The measure passed unanimously in the Senate but drew five “no” votes in the House, all from Republicans, including Rep. Jennifer Sullivan of Mount Dora, the youngest member of the Legislature at 24.' Once again the R's don't want people having fun. Nothing new there, Jerry Baumchen Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 893 #5 April 7, 2016 Now remember FloriDUH also recently passed a religious "protection" law, otherwise know as legal discrimination law...sooo.... "So folks living in sin and not married would be in conflict with my dad gum religious views, so I'm not able to serve you dinner here tonight folks. Move along." So much hatred. I don't understand. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #6 April 7, 2016 normissNow remember FloriDUH also recently passed a religious "protection" law, otherwise know as legal discrimination law...sooo.... "So folks living in sin and not married would be in conflict with my dad gum religious views, so I'm not able to serve you dinner here tonight folks. Move along." So much hatred. I don't understand. You do though. It's just the placement of the hatred that you seem to not understand.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 893 #7 April 7, 2016 You're still having comprehension challenges I see. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
winsor 236 #8 April 7, 2016 ryoder http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/politics/political-pulse/os-shacking-up-legal-scott-signs-bill-story.html “If any man and woman, not being married to each other, lewdly and lasciviously associate and cohabit together ... they shall be guilty of a second degree misdemeanor,” the former law stated. Damn! When they put it like that, it sounded like a hell of a lot of fun! 'Puritanism: The haunting fear that someone, somewhere, may be happy.' H.L. Mencken Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #9 April 7, 2016 normissYou're still having comprehension challenges I see. Nope. Not at all.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,114 #10 April 7, 2016 >From your link: 'The measure passed unanimously in the Senate but drew five “no” votes in the House, >all from Republicans, including Rep. Jennifer Sullivan of Mount Dora, the youngest member of the >Legislature at 24.' $10 says she's the next "family values" spokesperson found in a compromising position. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
headoverheels 334 #11 April 7, 2016 billvon>From your link: 'The measure passed unanimously in the Senate but drew five “no” votes in the House, >all from Republicans, including Rep. Jennifer Sullivan of Mount Dora, the youngest member of the >Legislature at 24.' $10 says she's the next "family values" spokesperson found in a compromising position. I'll take that bet. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites