turtlespeed 226 #1 March 31, 2016 Hmmm. . . . Over appearance no less. What will these silly liberals be racist about next?I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
headoverheels 334 #2 March 31, 2016 I wonder what she would think about someone disparaging black women who straighten their hair. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #3 March 31, 2016 headoverheels I wonder what she would think about someone disparaging black women who straighten their hair. That is some serious assault she did too - right?I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,596 #4 March 31, 2016 I'd probably have asked her why she was wearing white people's clothes. Then I'd probably have been expelled Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #5 March 31, 2016 jakee I'd probably have asked her why she was wearing white people's clothes. Then I'd probably have been expelled That is very tolerant of you.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,590 #6 March 31, 2016 If she think dreadlocks are exclusively "her" culture, then she needs to do some reading: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dreadlocks "There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #7 March 31, 2016 ryoder If she think dreadlocks are exclusively "her" culture, then she needs to do some reading: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dreadlocks I'm sure there are MANY many things she should look up. I bet she is all Whiney about "They just don't get it!" I'm still on the kick about the assault - that sure looks like more that this one guy did, and he was charged and his face was plastered all over the media for sensationalism.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #8 March 31, 2016 How do you know the boy with the dreads is a liberal?"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #9 March 31, 2016 rushmcHow do you know the boy with the dreads is a liberal? It was printed on the back of his pussification card.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #10 March 31, 2016 turtlespeed***How do you know the boy with the dreads is a liberal? It was printed on the back of his pussification card. LMAO Good thing for you my keyboard was already ruined!!!!"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #11 March 31, 2016 rushmc******How do you know the boy with the dreads is a liberal? It was printed on the back of his pussification card. LMAO Good thing for you my keyboard was already ruined!!!! Where is all the outrage from the liberals here defending the assault/battery charge of Trumps Campaign manager? I wonder if there is a double standard at work here.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #12 March 31, 2016 turtlespeed*********How do you know the boy with the dreads is a liberal? It was printed on the back of his pussification card. LMAO Good thing for you my keyboard was already ruined!!!! Where is all the outrage from the liberals here defending the assault/battery charge of Trumps Campaign manager? I wonder if there is a double standard at work here. If you think the incidents are similar in scope, then I am starting to understand the level of discourse you have been offering. You aren't trolling, you just aren't very bright. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wolfriverjoe 1,523 #13 March 31, 2016 turtlespeed Where is all the outrage from the liberals here defending the assault/battery charge of Trumps Campaign manager? I wonder if there is a double standard at work here. Of course there is a double standard. One idiot isn't running the campaign for Trump. The other idiot is the campaign manager for him."There are NO situations which do not call for a French Maid outfit." Lucky McSwervy "~ya don't GET old by being weak & stupid!" - Airtwardo Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,596 #14 March 31, 2016 QuoteWhere is all the outrage from the liberals here defending the assault/battery charge of Trumps Campaign manager? 1) It's not an assault/battery charge, it's a battery charge. 2) He did cause some physical harm to the reporter, did this chick hurt that guy at all? 3) Why should there be any outrage? I don't think anyone is really that bothered about Lewandowski being charged in a "he needs to pay for his crimes against humanity!!1!" kinda way, more about the confirmation (via the video) that he did exactly what she said he did and Trump's campaign have been lying through their teeth about it ever since. It is for me, anyway. It's the clearest indication yet of Trump's absolute refusal to admit liability, wrongdoing, error or mistakenness about anything - no matter how trivial the incident and how damning the evidence.Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #15 March 31, 2016 SkyDekker************How do you know the boy with the dreads is a liberal? It was printed on the back of his pussification card. LMAO Good thing for you my keyboard was already ruined!!!! Where is all the outrage from the liberals here defending the assault/battery charge of Trumps Campaign manager? I wonder if there is a double standard at work here. If you think the incidents are similar in scope, then I am starting to understand the level of discourse you[url] have been offering. You aren't trolling, you just aren't very bright. the level to which you just expose yourself is astounding! Of course they're the same. They're exactly the same. The only difference to you is there's no political gain to do all the bitching you've been doing."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #16 March 31, 2016 I know people who bruise when you look at them. You prove to me and everybody else at those bruises on her arm were caused by anybody at that rally. The intellectual dishonesty You two are displaying here is a sight to see"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,596 #17 March 31, 2016 rushmc I know people who bruise when you look at them. You prove to me and everybody else at those bruises on her arm were caused by anybody at that rally. The intellectual dishonesty You two are displaying here is a sight to see Oh, you got me Rush! I knew all along it was obviously just a huge coincidence those fingermark bruises appeared on her arm right after she was grabbed on her arm by Lewandowski, I just hoped no-one else would notice. Your laser like insight and nose for the truth has shone through once more. But seriously though, do you accept that Lewandowski and the Trump campaign were lying when they denied he touced her?Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #18 March 31, 2016 Not the point! But I will agree with you if you agree Hillary was lying when she said the tapes were the cause of Benghazi murders"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,596 #19 March 31, 2016 rushmcNot the point! That's the entire point, and has been all along. QuoteBut I will agree with you if you agree Hillary was lying when she said the tapes were the cause of Benghazi murders I lost interest in Benghazi quite a way back, and honestly have no idea who said what when and what they may or may not have known at the time. I'm quite prepared to believe she could have lied about that, but I really don't know enough about it. But why does it have to be tit for tat? This is a slam dunk, black and white, he lied. He definitely lied. There's no doubt about it. The only unanswered question is, will you admit it?Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #20 March 31, 2016 B*******! The entire point is whether or not a battery was committed. Nothing more, nothing less. You want to make anything more out of it find somebody who cares. Other than that you're barking up a dog's ass"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #21 March 31, 2016 by the way, we know exactly what was said and by whom and when. Hillary emailed her daughter less than one hour into the Benghazi attack telling her it was a terrorist attack. That is from the recovered emails that have come from her surver. She lied through her ass. But there's a guy in jail because supposedly his videos cause this over there. But you don't care"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,596 #22 March 31, 2016 rushmcB*******! The entire point is whether or not a battery was committed. Nothing more, nothing less. You want to make anything more out of it find somebody who cares. Other than that you're barking up a dog's ass Not to me, and not (I would think) to most people. I couldn't care less if he's convicted of a misdemeanor. The thing of it is, did he lie about it (and by lying, indirectly cause the reporter to lose her job)? So Rush, did he lie?Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #23 March 31, 2016 rushmcB*******! The entire point is whether or not a battery was committed. Nothing more, nothing less. You want to make anything more out of it find somebody who cares. Other than that you're barking up a dog's ass At least you are referring to yourself as a dog's ass, which is the most sensible thing you have typed in a very long time. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #24 March 31, 2016 QuoteOf course they're the same. They're exactly the same. There is absolutely no surprise you would think that. A presidential candidate and his campaign manager consistently denying what is evident on a video is exactly the same as an idiot student doing something stupid. Takes Trumpian logic to get there, but then you have fully bought in. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #25 March 31, 2016 SkyDekkerQuoteOf course they're the same. They're exactly the same. There is absolutely no surprise you would think that. A presidential candidate and his campaign manager consistently denying what is evident on a video is exactly the same as an idiot student doing something stupid. Takes Trumpian logic to get there, but then you have fully bought in. There is no indication that either one of "victims" were injured at the time of the alleged battery (also named assault depending which location of the world you are in.) Hell, any bruising if there is any, could be the result of rough sex the night before - or someone saving her from jumping in front of the subway.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites