I thought that Kansas was non-restrictive...

[piisfish 140]

regarding gun laws..

So where were all the gun holders to stop the killing ?

scissors beat paper, paper beat rock, rock beat wingsuit - KarlM

[christelsabine 1]

piisfish

regarding gun laws..

So where were all the gun holders to stop the killing ?

In Alaska? To cheer the new gun owner and her family, uncles etc. ?

dudeist skydiver # 3105

[rushmc 23]

piisfish

regarding gun laws..

So where were all the gun holders to stop the killing ?

while I am not up to speed on KS law, many states allow business to impede on its employees 2nd Amendment rights by letting the company tell employee they can not even have a weapon in the car on a company parking lot.


Do you know?

Or just a good time for you to spout off?

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[Zep 0]

Whoosh, Another case of a N. American not recognizing sarcasm.

Gone fishing

[rushmc 23]

Zep

Whoosh, Another case of a N. American not recognizing sarcasm.

With an edge maybe.....

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[gowlerk 2,275]

rushmc

***
Whoosh, Another case of a N. American not recognizing sarcasm.

With an edge maybe.....


Yes, it was sarcasm. But it was sarcasm used as an attack. You have to expect a counter attack when you do that.

Always remember the brave children who died defending your right to bear arms. Freedom is not free.

[SkyDekker 1,465]

Quote

impede on its employees 2nd Amendment rights by letting the company tell employee they can not even have a weapon in the car on a company parking lot.

Why would that impede the 2nd Amendment right? That right doesn't apply on private property when decided by the owner of that private property.

[rushmc 23]

SkyDekker

Quote

impede on its employees 2nd Amendment rights by letting the company tell employee they can not even have a weapon in the car on a company parking lot.

Why would that impede the 2nd Amendment right? That right doesn't apply on private property when decided by the owner of that private property.

Yes
That is the main point of that debate
However
It does effectively disarm people who are traveling to and from work
That is the other side of the debate
Pick you side

I have

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[SkyDekker 1,465]

rushmc

***

Quote

impede on its employees 2nd Amendment rights by letting the company tell employee they can not even have a weapon in the car on a company parking lot.

Why would that impede the 2nd Amendment right? That right doesn't apply on private property when decided by the owner of that private property.

Yes
That is the main point of that debate
However
It does effectively disarm people who are traveling to and from work
That is the other side of the debate
Pick you side

I have

But you said, "many states allow" this to happen. Are you saying that you believe states should force private property owners to allow guns on their private property?

[Coreeece 2]

Zep

Whoosh, Another case of a N. American not recognizing sarcasm.

Sarcasm tends to be a bit more subtle with elements of wit and humor. This was just lame.

Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour

[Coreeece 2]

christelsabine

***regarding gun laws..

So where were all the gun holders to stop the killing ?

In Alaska? To cheer the new gun owner and her family, uncles etc. ?

Speaking of lame. . .

Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour

[rushmc 23]

SkyDekker

******

Quote

impede on its employees 2nd Amendment rights by letting the company tell employee they can not even have a weapon in the car on a company parking lot.

Why would that impede the 2nd Amendment right? That right doesn't apply on private property when decided by the owner of that private property.

Yes
That is the main point of that debate
However
It does effectively disarm people who are traveling to and from work
That is the other side of the debate
Pick you side

I have

But you said, "many states allow" this to happen. Are you saying that you believe states should force private property owners to allow guns on their private property?

some do
some don't

and yes
If I want to keep a gun in my locked car in a parking lot, it is not any body else's business

Inside the business?
different argument

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[rushmc 23]

BTW
You will not talk me into a corner

You think yourself to be so sly

that is funny at best

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[Zep 0]

Coreeece

***
Whoosh, Another case of a N. American not recognizing sarcasm.

Sarcasm tends to be a bit more subtle with elements of wit and humor. This was just lame.

I disagree, sarcasm is direct and to the point, Irony is more wit and humour.

that's my take on it.

Gone fishing

[SkyDekker 1,465]

Quote

If I want to keep a gun in my locked car in a parking lot, it is not any body else's business

I agree that a person's car should be their own private property and people should be allowed to keep a gun locked in it.

[SkyDekker 1,465]

rushmc

BTW
You will not talk me into a corner

You think yourself to be so sly

that is funny at best

Paranoid much?

[rushmc 23]

SkyDekker

***BTW
You will not talk me into a corner

You think yourself to be so sly

that is funny at best

Paranoid much?

Not at all....

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[normiss 893]

Carrying, or being permitted to carry, weapons on other people's property has nothing to do with the 2nd.

[rushmc 23]

normiss

Carrying, or being permitted to carry, weapons on other people's property has nothing to do with the 2nd.

You do not read well do you

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[normiss 893]

Significantly better than you it would seem.

[normiss 893]

Quote

many states allow business to impede on its employees 2nd Amendment rights by letting the company tell employee they can not even have a weapon in the car on a company parking lot.

[rushmc 23]

Quote

and yes
If I want to keep a gun in my locked car in a parking lot, it is not any body else's business

Inside the business?
different argument

Yes it is a 2nd Amendment issue!
And I also posted the above

Here is one back atcha



LOL

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[rushmc 23]

normiss

Significantly better than you it would seem.

Not so much.......

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[normiss 893]

Your interpretations of the 2nd are inaccurate at best.
You really could help us out here with a Rushtranslator.

[rushmc 23]

normiss

Your interpretations of the 2nd are inaccurate at best.
You really could help us out here with a Rushtranslator.

and the great debater strikes again

Let me ask you this.
Should your employer have the right to tell you to remove a bumper sticker from your car is parked in said companies lot?

And the only reason I would need any kind of translator would be to try and understand some of the liberal loons out there.....

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln