cvfd1399 0 #276 November 13, 2015 Complete misunderstanding by both of you. I never told anyone to stop replying to any questions. I said if I'm not the one making the claims obama is never picked on then don't insinuate to me that I am when you do reply to me. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #277 November 13, 2015 cvfd1399Complete misunderstanding by both of you. I never told anyone to stop replying to any questions. I said if I'm not the one making the claims obama is never picked on then don't insinuate to me that I am when you do reply to me. When you have nothing to combat the butt hurtness from realizing what an imbecile their golden boy is, you attack the poster. SOP for most liberals here. There are a few exceptions.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #278 November 13, 2015 turtlespeed***Complete misunderstanding by both of you. I never told anyone to stop replying to any questions. I said if I'm not the one making the claims obama is never picked on then don't insinuate to me that I am when you do reply to me. When you have nothing to combat the butt hurtness from realizing what an imbecile their golden boy is, you attack the poster. SOP for most liberals here. There are a few exceptions. Amen"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,596 #279 November 13, 2015 cvfd1399 Complete misunderstanding by both of you. I never told anyone to stop replying to any questions. No sir I said stop replying this to me... ?Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cvfd1399 0 #280 November 13, 2015 Yes stop replying this(the statement implying I'm the one saying the media never goes after obama) to me. How fucking hard is this for you to comprehend? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
grue 1 #281 November 13, 2015 billvon>CNN and the ilk will do anything to discredit him He's doing a fine job of that himself. The most incriminating part of the stuff about him is his own words. >in contrast to how they didn't vet the current POTUS. Definitely. We never heard a thing from the media about how he was "just" a community organizer, how he was a Muslim who was born in Kenya, how he "threw his grandmother under the bus," how he would confiscate all guns when he was elected, how he was planning FEMA concentration camps or how he refused to say the pledge of allegiance. We never heard about Bill Ayers or Rev. Wright, and Obama was never connected to those people. He was never accused of being a secret terrorist who would establish a New Caliphate in the US. Never heard a peep about him going to a Madrasa as a kid, or that he speaks Arabic as his native tongue. And of course we never heard anything about his birth certificate. Right. Sarcasm aside, the media didn't point out that his voting record was in stark contrast with what he claimed he stood for. Is that their job? Not my call. But with the majority of Americans apparently believing what politicians tell them… ouch. Anyone who is remotely surprised that he turned out to be essentially a continuation of Bush 2.0 with a few exceptions didn't do even a modicum of research.cavete terrae. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,596 #282 November 13, 2015 cvfd1399Yes stop replying this(the statement implying I'm the one saying the media never goes after obama) to me. How fucking hard is this for you to comprehend? Because that's not what you had previously said when you told Bill you had said it.Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,120 #283 November 13, 2015 >How fucking hard is this for you to comprehend? Are we not supposed to answer this question because it's another trick? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #284 November 13, 2015 billvon>How fucking hard is this for you to comprehend? Are we not supposed to answer this question because it's another trick? I don't know, but he sure does get cranky when people don't do what he wants them to do. He should apply to become a police officer, seems to be a common trait amongst them. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cvfd1399 0 #285 November 13, 2015 Quote1. ME Quote: All I was doing was playing devils advocate to show him that hey it isn't just all politicians have a closet full of skeletons. 2. YOU Quote: And thanks for the examples of how the media did not take it easy on Obama, despite the claims to the contrary. 3.ME Quote: Who here claimed they did not? 4.YOU Quote: RushMC. (See above.) 5. ME Quote: Great so why are you replying to me with the claims. Have I ever said that? Not at all He made the claims in a reply to me that "And thanks for the examples of how the media did not take it easy on Obama, despite the claims to the contrary." I stated to him who here is saying that. He replied it was rush, Then I replied great so why are you replying to me implying those type of claims are mine. I never once stated "Shut up when you are talking to me" or whatever other bullshit both of you are trying to spin this as. If I had came out of the blue and said why are you replying to me yea I would be with you on this, but I asked him a question, he answered that it was ment for rushmc, then I said great then why are you replying to me about it(the claims). CONTEXT@! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DanG 1 #286 November 13, 2015 QuoteIf I had came out of the blue and said why are you replying to me yea I would be with you on this, but I asked him a question, he answered that it was ment for rushmc, then I said great then why are you replying to me about it(the claims). BECAUSE YOU POSTED THE FUCKING EVIDENCE THAT RUSH WAS WRONG!!! HE THANKED YOU PROVING RUSH WRONG, HE NEVER SAID YOU WERE THE PERSON WHO CLAIMED IT!!! Holy shit this is the stupidest sub-thread ever. - Dan G Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #287 November 13, 2015 DanG Quote If I had came out of the blue and said why are you replying to me yea I would be with you on this, but I asked him a question, he answered that it was ment for rushmc, then I said great then why are you replying to me about it(the claims). BECAUSE YOU POSTED THE FUCKING EVIDENCE THAT RUSH WAS WRONG!!! HE THANKED YOU PROVING RUSH WRONG, HE NEVER SAID YOU WERE THE PERSON WHO CLAIMED IT!!! Holy shit this is the stupidest sub-thread ever. It sure the hell is now with your post!!!"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 898 #288 November 13, 2015 aaaand....right back in character. Speaking of "great conversationalists". Jebus balls man. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cvfd1399 0 #289 November 13, 2015 EXACTLY WHY I TOLD HIM TO STOP REPLYING TO ME WITH THE INSINUATIONS. IF I JUST RANDOMLY REPLIED TO YOU WITH "THANKS FOR CONFIRMING BUSH DID 9/11" WOULDNT YOU ASK IF YOU HAD ONCE SAID THAT, THEN ONCE THEY REPLIED NO, WOULDNT YOU THEN ASK THEM TO NOT INFER IT OR REPLY TO THEM WITH THAT STATEMENT ANYMORE!?!! That's all that happened. You are right there is some stupidity going around here and it's to do with context and continuity of people's reading skills. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,590 #290 November 13, 2015 This thread just keeps getting better and better!Uh, oh! I'm running low on popcorn; Better run down to the grocery for more. BRB. "There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DanG 1 #291 November 13, 2015 QuoteIF I JUST RANDOMLY REPLIED TO YOU WITH "THANKS FOR CONFIRMING BUSH DID 9/11" The reply wasn't random.One or two posts above yours there was a discussion about how the media never went after Obama. Then you post an example of the media going after Obama. Everyone assumed you were actually reading the thread, and replying in context. Aparently you were not actually reading the thread, and your reply just happened to be in context. I'm sure everyone is terribly sorry that they assumed you were trying to be part of the conversation. - Dan G Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #292 November 13, 2015 normiss aaaand....right back in character. Speaking of "great conversationalists". Jebus balls man. Yet another high end conversation one who tells others they are hard to talk too "America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cvfd1399 0 #293 November 13, 2015 My recent involvement in this thread started at post 251 when I replied to show that obama also had some shady friends in the closet also to balance out all the Carson claims. At that point the only thing being discussed between us was ben Carson and his fraudulent doctor. At post 254 is when billvon replied to me unsolicited about the media and obama. I was not discussing that or even mentioned it, is why I was puzzled to have him insinuate and make a blanket statement about it. I questioned him he said it was someone else I said ok well then wtf are you preaching it to me for? So in fact you need to go back and read and you will see that it was billvon yourself and others who are out of context and it was drive by one liners that have this all fucked up. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,596 #294 November 13, 2015 cvfd1399 ***1. ME Quote: All I was doing was playing devils advocate to show him that hey it isn't just all politicians have a closet full of skeletons. 2. YOU Quote: And thanks for the examples of how the media did not take it easy on Obama, despite the claims to the contrary. 3.ME Quote: Who here claimed they did not? 4.YOU Quote: RushMC. (See above.) 5. ME Quote: Great so why are you replying to me with the claims. Have I ever said that? Not at all Why are you disagreeing with your own post? Quote I never once stated "Shut up when you are talking to me" No one ever once stated you stated it. Quote If I had came out of the blue and said why are you replying to me yea I would be with you on this, but I asked him a question, he answered that it was ment for rushmc, then I said great then why are you replying to me about it So what it all boils down to is that you should have said "why did you reply to me" instead of "why are you replying to me"?Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 898 #295 November 13, 2015 rushmc ***aaaand....right back in character. Speaking of "great conversationalists". Jebus balls man. Yet another high end conversation one who tells others they are hard to talk too I cannot imagine me ever saying whatever that is that you wrote. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,120 #296 November 13, 2015 >Why are you disagreeing with your own post? This whole thread is getting very odd. CVFD seems to be pretty pissed off at CVFD now. But he can't ask about it, because when he asks a question and someone answers it, that pisses him off too. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cvfd1399 0 #297 November 13, 2015 You are out of context and out of control in this forum. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 898 #298 November 13, 2015 He seems pretty spot on to most people. Most of the time Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wolfriverjoe 1,523 #299 November 14, 2015 normiss He seems pretty spot on to most people. Most of the time I have yet to see Bill make post after post after post bitching about the style and wording and intent of other people's posts... Without actually discussing the subject of the thread."There are NO situations which do not call for a French Maid outfit." Lucky McSwervy "~ya don't GET old by being weak & stupid!" - Airtwardo Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,150 #300 November 24, 2015 So today Carson had a "Now you see it, now you don't" moment. First he claimed, on camera, to have seen video of Muslims celebrating the 9/11 attacks in New Jersey. Then his campaign announced that he hadn't.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
