rushmc 23 #1 November 2, 2015 kallend is always interested in what NASA has to say about the ice down there Here is the latest from them! QuoteFrom the “settled science” department and former chief alarmist Jay Zwally, who for years had said the Arctic was in big trouble (only to have his prediction falsified), comes this Emily Litella moment in climate science: “Never mind!”. Curiously, WUWT reported back in 2012 about an ICEsat study by Zwally that said: ICESAT Data Shows Mass Gains of the Antarctic Ice Sheet Exceed Losses. I surmise that with the publication of this second study, the original is now confirmed. I suppose John Cook will have to revise his “Denial 101” video on Antarctica now. I gotta admit I do like the tone of this commenthttp://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/10/31/ooops-new-nasa-study-antarctica-isnt-losing-ice-mass-after-all/"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,150 #2 November 2, 2015 rushmc kallend is always interested in what NASA has to say about the ice down there Here is the latest from them! Quote From the “settled science” department and former chief alarmist Jay Zwally, who for years had said the Arctic was in big trouble (only to have his prediction falsified), comes this Emily Litella moment in climate science: “Never mind!”. Curiously, WUWT reported back in 2012 about an ICEsat study by Zwally that said: ICESAT Data Shows Mass Gains of the Antarctic Ice Sheet Exceed Losses. I surmise that with the publication of this second study, the original is now confirmed. I suppose John Cook will have to revise his “Denial 101” video on Antarctica now. I gotta admit I do like the tone of this commenthttp://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/10/31/ooops-new-nasa-study-antarctica-isnt-losing-ice-mass-after-all/ Why didn't you post the original article instead of the spin version from your favorite denier site?... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #3 November 2, 2015 kallend ***kallend is always interested in what NASA has to say about the ice down there Here is the latest from them! Quote From the “settled science” department and former chief alarmist Jay Zwally, who for years had said the Arctic was in big trouble (only to have his prediction falsified), comes this Emily Litella moment in climate science: “Never mind!”. Curiously, WUWT reported back in 2012 about an ICEsat study by Zwally that said: ICESAT Data Shows Mass Gains of the Antarctic Ice Sheet Exceed Losses. I surmise that with the publication of this second study, the original is now confirmed. I suppose John Cook will have to revise his “Denial 101” video on Antarctica now. I gotta admit I do like the tone of this commenthttp://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/10/31/ooops-new-nasa-study-antarctica-isnt-losing-ice-mass-after-all/ Why didn't you post the original article instead of the spin version from your favorite denier site? Content is still there and correct How is crow tasting this AM?"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DanG 1 #4 November 2, 2015 So that's good news for the planet (and your "team"). Will you stop making the claim that science that doesn't agree with AGW is never published? - Dan G Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #5 November 2, 2015 DanGSo that's good news for the planet (and your "team"). Will you stop making the claim that science that doesn't agree with AGW is never published? Did you see it any place in the Democratic super pac media?"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DanG 1 #6 November 2, 2015 Um, yeah. It showed up on my Google News feed. - Dan G Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #7 November 2, 2015 DanGUm, yeah. It showed up on my Google News feed. Hmm I didn't know that Google News was part of the PAC Who did they link too?"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DanG 1 #8 November 2, 2015 It was linked to the Christian Science Monitor. The whole PAC thing is fucking stupid. - Dan G Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #9 November 2, 2015 DanGIt was linked to the Christian Science Monitor. The whole PAC thing is fucking stupid. No, it is dead on Has been for years I did not see any info on this on NBC CBS ABC NPR MSNBC CNBC et al"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DanG 1 #10 November 2, 2015 QuoteNo, it is dead on Has been for years Whatever. It's just a convenient ploy for GOP candidates to avoid answering questions. - Dan G Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #11 November 2, 2015 DanG Quote No, it is dead on Has been for years Whatever. It's just a convenient ploy for GOP candidates to avoid answering questions. LMFAO!!! Ya Whatever back atcha "America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
winsor 236 #12 November 2, 2015 kallend Why didn't you post the original article instead of the spin version from your favorite denier site? This is the one I came across. They basically said that the models suck, but that we should remain cautiously terrified anyway. I'm still scared beyond the capacity for rational thought (with apologies to Harold Ramis). Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #13 November 2, 2015 winsor *** Why didn't you post the original article instead of the spin version from your favorite denier site? This is the one I came across. They basically said that the models suck, but that we should remain cautiously terrified anyway. I'm still scared beyond the capacity for rational thought (with apologies to Harold Ramis). So you are indeed a true liberal. I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,120 #14 November 2, 2015 >I did not see any info on this on >NBC http://www.nbc26.com/newsy/antarctica-might-be-melting-but-its-actually-growing Quick! Deny! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #15 November 2, 2015 billvon>I did not see any info on this on >NBC http://www.nbc26.com/newsy/antarctica-might-be-melting-but-its-actually-growing Quick! Deny! Deny that a small affiliate, 7 hours after he posted that it wasn't on the network you say it is NOW? Is that what you want him to deny?I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,120 #16 November 2, 2015 >Deny that a small affiliate, 7 hours after he posted that it wasn't on the >network you say it is NOW? >Is that what you want him to deny? No, I figure he will deny whatever he likes. Meanwhile back in the real world, here's a Google News search: "antarctic ice sheet gaining ice" About 16,000 results (0.35 seconds) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,150 #17 November 2, 2015 rushmc ***So that's good news for the planet (and your "team"). Will you stop making the claim that science that doesn't agree with AGW is never published? Did you see it any place in the Democratic super pac media? It was on my Google news feed this morning.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #18 November 2, 2015 turtlespeed***>I did not see any info on this on >NBC http://www.nbc26.com/newsy/antarctica-might-be-melting-but-its-actually-growing Quick! Deny! Deny that a small affiliate, 7 hours after he posted that it wasn't on the network you say it is NOW? Is that what you want him to deny? It is all he has got"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
faulknerwn 38 #19 November 2, 2015 And there are also interesting articles like this: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2015/10/26/east-antarcticas-biggest-glacier-is-melting-from-below-study-confirms/ I listen to these guys because one of them is a Texas skydiver (Jamin Greenbaum) and he spends a large percentage of his year flying around in C130s around Antarctica measuring the ice! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,150 #20 November 2, 2015 rushmc******>I did not see any info on this on >NBC http://www.nbc26.com/newsy/antarctica-might-be-melting-but-its-actually-growing Quick! Deny! Deny that a small affiliate, 7 hours after he posted that it wasn't on the network you say it is NOW? Is that what you want him to deny? It is all he has got Here is a link to the original article. You might want to read their methodology before crowing any more: www.ingentaconnect.com/content/igsoc/jog/pre-prints/content-ings_jog_15j071[/url]... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
winsor 236 #21 November 2, 2015 turtlespeed***>I did not see any info on this on >NBC http://www.nbc26.com/newsy/antarctica-might-be-melting-but-its-actually-growing Quick! Deny! Deny that a small affiliate, 7 hours after he posted that it wasn't on the network you say it is NOW? Is that what you want him to deny? The liberal application of Government is the solution to all of our problems, all of them I tell you! If the Government did not take money away from people to spend on Worthwhile Things (tm), these foolhardy people would waste these funds on things that do not serve the Common Good - or, worse yet, they would SAVE that money so that it does NOBODY any good. We elect the wisest from among us to represent our very best interests, and Government Employees are the finest minds, who address every problem with the very best possible outcome. Capitalists are concerned with turning a buck, and couldn't care less about the noble goal of bringing Truth, Justice and the American Way to the whole world. Capitalists want to pick up their shovel, pack up their ass, get on their camel and head to the promised land. Progressives know to put down their shovel, sit on their ass and light up a Camel - this IS the promised land. Go Bernie! (he's so kewl...) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cvfd1399 0 #22 November 3, 2015 You dont post in here often so your bias towards posters should be pretty even keel and you seem to be in the know so I will pose this question to you. We know the climate is changing. We know that the earths climate has changed in the past. We know that it has been hotter, colder, wetter, dryer in the past. We know that man via deforestation, emissions, etc can change the earth on land and in the air. Knowing all that would you say that this global warming, weather change, whatever you want to call it today is. 1. Normal changing weather patterns as shown in history no man made input affecting it at all. 2. Normal changing weather patterns with a slight bit of man made input helping the change. The change is natural but man because he has been measured to have altered it some he is getting all the wrap for it and in fact its just a normal weather change behind all the politics. 3. All man made changes with a bit of normal global weather change as recorded in scientific ice and dirt samples. Man is the cause mother nature is just adding to it. 4. Man is the entire cause, and the normal earth patterns have not changed a bit. Man is entirely at fault. This is not a setup for another question, and not some sort of trap. I seriously wonder what the actual answer is. I will leave out what I think the answer is out of the above till later. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,150 #23 November 3, 2015 rushmc***Um, yeah. It showed up on my Google News feed. Hmm I didn't know that Google News was part of the PAC Who did they link too? It was amusing when Rubio used that line in the debate last week. Your repeated parroting of his line is neither original, clever, nor entertaining.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rehmwa 2 #24 November 3, 2015 winsor*** Why didn't you post the original article instead of the spin version from your favorite denier site? This is the one I came across. They basically said that the models suck, but that we should remain cautiously terrified anyway. I'm still scared beyond the capacity for rational thought (with apologies to Harold Ramis). Next month - "hysterical public gathers and chants for closure and defunding of NASA" ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #25 November 3, 2015 kallend******Um, yeah. It showed up on my Google News feed. Hmm I didn't know that Google News was part of the PAC Who did they link too? It was amusing when Rubio used that line in the debate last week. Your repeated parroting of his line is neither original, clever, nor entertaining. Of course it is not amusing What the media does is dishonest and disgusting. and for you here, the truth hurts!"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
