Well, this is NOT Big Oil Money

[rushmc 23]

This is the same douche bag that wants climate deniers investigated under the RICO act

Seems he has a mess of his own now!

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/10/02/jagadish-shuklas-rico20-blunder-may-have-opened-the-largest-science-scandal-in-us-history/

Quote

At issue is at least 63.5 million dollars from the National Science Foundation, and where it went, whether it was used for the purpose intended, and who benefited from that money. The problem at hand seems to be that there may have been more than a little “double dipping” going on with that grant money as Steve McIntyre pointed out in Shukla’s Gold:

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[rushmc 23]

There are a series of stories on the sight regarding this fraud

This is the one that started it all
The one that shows the letter to Obama, requesting RICO investigations.

To protect is income it now seems

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/09/29/the-rico-20-letter-to-obama-asking-for-prosecution-of-climate-skeptics-disappears-from-shuklas-iges-website-amid-financial-concerns/

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[kallend 2,150]

1. Wattsupwiththat is a joke. Like Breitbart and Limbaugh.

2. SITE, not sight.

...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

[rushmc 23]

kallend

1. Wattsupwiththat is a joke. Like Breitbart and Limbaugh.

2. SITE, not sight.

Again
No content posts

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[kallend 2,150]

rushmc

***
1. Wattsupwiththat is a joke. Like Breitbart and Limbaugh.

2. SITE, not sight.

Again
No content posts

Lessons in spelling and punctuation (missing in your quoted post) ARE content.

You might be taken more seriously if you wrote in a manner that suggests you've had an education, and quoted web sites that aren't garbage.

...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

[rushmc 23]

kallend

******
1. Wattsupwiththat is a joke. Like Breitbart and Limbaugh.

2. SITE, not sight.

Again
No content posts

Lessons in spelling and punctuation (missing in your quoted post) ARE content.

You might be taken more seriously if you wrote in a manner that suggests you've had an education, and quoted web sites that aren't garbage.

Another content free post

you are on a role

BTW
I don't give a fuck if you take me seriously or not
And anything you don't agree with is garbage to use your term

But, you are consistent

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[kallend 2,150]

rushmc

*********
1. Wattsupwiththat is a joke. Like Breitbart and Limbaugh.

2. SITE, not sight.

Again
No content posts

Lessons in spelling and punctuation (missing in your quoted post) ARE content.

You might be taken more seriously if you wrote in a manner that suggests you've had an education, and quoted web sites that aren't garbage.

Another content free post PERIOD MISSING

you are on a roleROLL

BTW
I don't give a fuck if you take me seriously or not PERIOD MISSING
And anything you don't agree with is garbage to use your term PERIOD MISSING

But, you are consistent PERIOD MISSING

One of the most consistent things in Speakers Corner is your inability to write in your own native language.

...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

[rushmc 23]

kallend

************
1. Wattsupwiththat is a joke. Like Breitbart and Limbaugh.

2. SITE, not sight.

Again
No content posts

Lessons in spelling and punctuation (missing in your quoted post) ARE content.

You might be taken more seriously if you wrote in a manner that suggests you've had an education, and quoted web sites that aren't garbage.

Another content free post PERIOD MISSING

you are on a roleROLL

BTW
I don't give a fuck if you take me seriously or not PERIOD MISSING
And anything you don't agree with is garbage to use your term PERIOD MISSING

But, you are consistent PERIOD MISSING

One of the most consistent things in Speakers Corner is your inability to write in your own native language.

3 posts now and not one word about a scientist who took 64 million dollars in the name of climate change

going for 4 I am sure

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[SkyDekker 1,465]

Quote

3 posts now and not one word about a scientist who took 64 million dollars in the name of climate change

So some scientists are crooks...what's your point? So far the story is of the dog bites man variant.

[kallend 2,150]

SkyDekker

Quote

3 posts now and not one word about a scientist who took 64 million dollars in the name of climate change

So some scientists are crooks...what's your point? So far the story is of the dog bites man variant.

As usual, rushmc fails to read what is written.

There is a big "may have" right at the start of the article. Fairly typical of sites like wuwt, breitbart, etc. to present a supposition and then treat it as proven fact.

...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

[headoverheels 334]

kallend

There is a big "may have" right at the start of the article. Fairly typical of sites like wuwt, breitbart, etc. to present a supposition and then treat it as proven fact.

Also a way to avoid libel.

[rushmc 23]

SkyDekker

Quote

3 posts now and not one word about a scientist who took 64 million dollars in the name of climate change

So some scientists are crooks...what's your point? So far the story is of the dog bites man variant.

Are you being obtuse? How many times has it been posted that big oil money is the only reason for deniers?

Well, big government give more money to big education by far
So, how is really protecting themselves?

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[rushmc 23]

kallend

***

Quote

3 posts now and not one word about a scientist who took 64 million dollars in the name of climate change

So some scientists are crooks...what's your point? So far the story is of the dog bites man variant.

As usual, rushmc fails to read what is written.

There is a big "may have" right at the start of the article. Fairly typical of sites like wuwt, breitbart, etc. to present a supposition and then treat it as proven fact.

6 posts, no content attacking the poster and the sights

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[rushmc 23]

headoverheels

***
There is a big "may have" right at the start of the article. Fairly typical of sites like wuwt, breitbart, etc. to present a supposition and then treat it as proven fact.

Also a way to avoid libel.

Last I noted nearly all criminal reporting used those words for your reason and others

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[kallend 2,150]

rushmc

******

Quote

3 posts now and not one word about a scientist who took 64 million dollars in the name of climate change

So some scientists are crooks...what's your point? So far the story is of the dog bites man variant.

As usual, rushmc fails to read what is written.

There is a big "may have" right at the start of the article. Fairly typical of sites like wuwt, breitbart, etc. to present a supposition and then treat it as proven fact.

6 posts, no content attacking the poster and the sights

As usual, rushmc fails to read what is written.

...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

[rushmc 23]

kallend

*********

Quote

3 posts now and not one word about a scientist who took 64 million dollars in the name of climate change

So some scientists are crooks...what's your point? So far the story is of the dog bites man variant.

As usual, rushmc fails to read what is written.

There is a big "may have" right at the start of the article. Fairly typical of sites like wuwt, breitbart, etc. to present a supposition and then treat it as proven fact.

6 posts, no content attacking the poster and the sights

As usual, rushmc fails to read what is written.

7

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[SkyDekker 1,465]

Quote

Last I noted nearly all criminal reporting used those words for your reason and others

Uhm no, they use words like "allegedly" and "it is alleged that".

[rushmc 23]

SkyDekker

Quote

Last I noted nearly all criminal reporting used those words for your reason and others

Uhm no, they use words like "allegedly" and "it is alleged that".

Ah
You got the only working words for this
Got it

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[rushmc 23]

More money please

Quote

Société de Calcul Mathématique: Several French mathematicians under the Société de Calcul Mathématique SA wrote a 195 page white paper on global warming and the political ramifications of the actions of its proponents. The title of the paper is well put: “The battle against global warming: an absurd, costly and pointless crusade.” Writing from the perspective of French, European, and world policy, the paper finds an enormous impact on the economy with every activity affected. It also states:

“The impact on the entire field of scientific research is particularly clear and especially pernicious. No project can be launched, on any subject whatsoever, unless it makes direct reference to global warming. You want to look at the geology of the Garonne Basin? It is, after all, an entirely normal and socially useful subject in every respect. Well, your research will be funded, approved and published only if it mentions the potential for geological storage of CO2. It is appalling.



“The crusade has invaded every area of activity and everyone‘s thinking: the battle against CO2 has become a national priority. How have we reached this point, in a country that claims to be rational? At the root lie the declarations made by the IPPC [IPCC], which have been repeated over the years and taken up by the European Commission and the Member States. France, which likes to see itself as the good boy of Europe‘, adds an extra layer of virtue to every crusade. When others introduce reductions, we will on principle introduce bigger reductions, without ever questioning their appropriateness: a crusade is virtuous by its very nature. And you can never be too virtuous.



“But mathematicians do not believe in crusades; they look at facts, figures, observations and arguments.”

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln