SkyDekker 1,465 #326 December 1, 2015 ryoder *** So you and your buddy know what news this guy gets I see. A guy who lived alone in a trailer with no power phone or tv and you know the news stories you just lied about drove his behavior He was picked up after the shooting at PP, muttering about "no more baby parts". And he just made that connection at random? That is just a liberal media lie to make the right look bad. Happens all the time. Lamestream media and stuff. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gowlerk 2,255 #327 December 2, 2015 Ok right wing guys. There is a definite straight line from the baby part lies used against PP to the death of that fine police officer. I know the other two won't matter much to you.Always remember the brave children who died defending your right to bear arms. Freedom is not free. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,590 #328 December 2, 2015 "Ex-wife says clinic suspect targeted Planned Parenthood": http://news.yahoo.com/lawyer-man-clinic-attack-wants-bar-publicity-000808411.html She must be part of the liberal conspiracy. "There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #329 December 2, 2015 ryoder "Ex-wife says clinic suspect targeted Planned Parenthood": http://news.yahoo.com/lawyer-man-clinic-attack-wants-bar-publicity-000808411.html She must be part of the liberal conspiracy. Yes absolutely. Media got to her first and told her what to say! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wolfriverjoe 1,523 #330 December 2, 2015 SkyDekker ***"Ex-wife says clinic suspect targeted Planned Parenthood": http://news.yahoo.com/lawyer-man-clinic-attack-wants-bar-publicity-000808411.html She must be part of the liberal conspiracy. Yes absolutely. Media got to her first and told her what to say! Ya mean the media like Fox News? The Daily Show had a rather interesting view of it."There are NO situations which do not call for a French Maid outfit." Lucky McSwervy "~ya don't GET old by being weak & stupid!" - Airtwardo Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SoCalJumper 0 #331 December 2, 2015 Prior to the "Dirty Harry" movie series gun violence was never depicted in movies as being empowering or "cool". In fact prior to this, in a cowboy western when the bad guy was shot he gripped his chest, pirouetted, picked a flower, and fell to the ground holding the flower to his chest..... who can say cornball. The 2nd amendment shall not be infringed but what should be infringed is the depiction of sexy empowering gun violence in popular culture, movies and media. Since Obama is in bed with Hollywood it would be easy for him to start their, except he works for them, not the other way around. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 867 #332 December 2, 2015 Start their what? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #333 December 2, 2015 normissThe UCMJ. What section of the UCMJ specifically says you can commit an act of terrorism, and then have it labeled as workplace violence, because it might look bad politically?I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 867 #334 December 2, 2015 Pay attention. Crime committed by a service member on a military facility falls under the UCMJ. There are no charges for terrorism in the UCMJ, hence the murder charges. You keep wanting to make this emotional and political. It's not. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RMK 3 #335 December 2, 2015 We've got our daily US mass shooting happening right now in San Bernadino."Pain is the best instructor, but no one wants to attend his classes" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rehmwa 2 #336 December 2, 2015 normissYou keep wanting to make this emotional and political. but won't someone think of puppies and children, only the one party can fix it - old Yeller had to be shot, poor Timmy, contaminating that fresh water well. It's like having to watch a Robin die on a sidewalk. vote early, so we can feel better about this and so fairies won't die from not clapping your hands ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,113 #337 December 2, 2015 RMKWe've got our daily US mass shooting happening right now in San Bernadino. 20 victims reported so far.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 867 #338 December 2, 2015 And we reset the dick wrestling chart, time to repeat the same idiocy once again. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #339 December 2, 2015 normiss Pay attention. Crime committed by a service member on a military facility falls under the UCMJ. There are no charges for terrorism in the UCMJ, hence the murder charges. You keep wanting to make this emotional and political. It's not. Calling it workplace violence puts it in the same category of sexual harassment in the workplace. The reason terrorism isn't in the UCMJ, is that it hasn't happened before. Just because something hasn't happened before doesn't mean we need to dress it up in PC feel better verbiage that is bullshit at the very least, an outright lie in the mean, and a politically motivated fraud at best.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 867 #340 December 2, 2015 Fine. Ignore the law. I'm outta wasted breath. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rick 67 #341 December 2, 2015 kallend***We've got our daily US mass shooting happening right now in San Bernadino. 20 victims reported so far. possibly 3 shooters with masksYou can't be drunk all day if you don't start early! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #342 December 2, 2015 normissFine. Ignore the law. I'm outta wasted breath. Good thing. We all know that standing up for the right thing takes effort. Are you outta breath for that too?I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rick 67 #343 December 2, 2015 live news feedYou can't be drunk all day if you don't start early! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JohnnyMarko 1 #344 December 2, 2015 Ricklive news feed I'm listening to the police scanner. Going to turn it off now. This sounds like it's getting really serious and I'm just going to wait til it's over and facts are out. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cvfd1399 0 #345 December 2, 2015 No one here but you is arguing that fact. You can't seem to understand there are three things going on. The legal charge that the military HAD to use, what it actually was, and how POTUS spun it. We(and most of America) are all talking about how it was terrorism. He admitted it himself with credible proof. You are sticking with the arguement it was only workplace violence because that's the only thing to charge him withdue to there being no other charge trying to make yourself right. The media also agreed it was terrorism but understood the charges due to the circumstances. And the president well we know his reasons for trying to sidestep it. It was terrorism plain and simple everyone and their mother knows it was charged like it was due to no terrorism charge in the UCMJ. That doesn't change the fact that it is what it was no matter the default charge it falls under. I'm surprised you can't understand the fact that people still do things that are illegal and do not have a specific law to fall under so it gets amended or interpreted another way and filed under an applicable law. It still doesn't change what it actually was. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,085 #346 December 2, 2015 QuoteThe reason terrorism isn't in the UCMJ, is that it hasn't happened before. Just because something hasn't happened before doesn't mean we need to dress it up in PC feel better verbiage that is bullshit at the very least, an outright lie in the mean, and a politically motivated fraud at best. What's wrong with obeying the law? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #347 December 2, 2015 QuoteAnd the president well we know his reasons for trying to sidestep it. I don't. Why did he try to sidestep it? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cvfd1399 0 #348 December 2, 2015 SkyDekkerQuoteAnd the president well we know his reasons for trying to sidestep it. I don't. Why did he try to sidestep it? To play down the pattern of Islamic terror and not incite panic. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #349 December 2, 2015 cvfd1399***QuoteAnd the president well we know his reasons for trying to sidestep it. I don't. Why did he try to sidestep it? To play down the pattern of Islamic terror and not incite panic. There is no pattern of Islamic terror in the US. Inciting panic is almost never a good idea. If that was his reasoning, it would appear to be pretty sound. Why exactly are you so vehemently opposed to this reasoning? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,085 #350 December 2, 2015 >There is no pattern of Islamic terror in the US. Indeed, there is a clearer pattern of Christian terrorism in the US. Why is he trying to downplay that? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
