Planned Parenthood and the term "slippery slope" .

[cvfd1399 0]

answer the question.

[normiss 893]

Hence my comment, your request is invalid.
It wasn't part of the conversation.
At least until it took a left turn anyway.

[cvfd1399 0]

Quote

At least until it took a left turn anyway.

When Maddmax and yourself took that turn is when I asked....Hence the valid question I am asking an answer for....I already know my answer based off your attitude dont even bother.

I understand that you now know your comment was narrow minded when you first stated it and you do not agree(i hope) with evil laws in the past such as ones that allowed you to beat women with a belt as long as it was not more than a certain width of leather, etc etc you are just too proud to admit to the fact that one day we might just look back on scraping future humans out of people when not medically necessary and go WTF we were thinking.

People who have enough foresight to stand up against these laws even if it is currently legal are the ones that stand out in history when America finally realizes when they were wrong. The ones who can't usually blindly stand behind the laws and throw insults at the ones doing it, and this goes for many instances just go back and look at the civil rights movement.

[turtlespeed 226]

turtlespeed

***

Quote

I suppose you are going to lump Syed Ramook and draw a strait line to all Muslims too.

I don't know who that is, and Google was no help. You may misspelled him name? But in any case, yes, I do draw a straight line from Islamic leaders who spew hatred and preach violence to those Muslims who practice violence. It's the same principle. You've got it.

Yes, evidently auto correct is versatile.

It should be Syed Farook

So. Straight line?

I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

[rushmc 23]

turtlespeed

******

Quote

I suppose you are going to lump Syed Ramook and draw a strait line to all Muslims too.

I don't know who that is, and Google was no help. You may misspelled him name? But in any case, yes, I do draw a straight line from Islamic leaders who spew hatred and preach violence to those Muslims who practice violence. It's the same principle. You've got it.

Yes, evidently auto correct is versatile.

It should be Syed Farook

So. Straight line?

I wonder if he draws a straight line from the Imams who preach killing the Jews and all non-believers?

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[wmw999 2,587]

He probably doesn't draw them to every single Muslim. That'd be like drawing the line from Westboro Baptist Church to every single Baptist. Baptists aren't all alike anyore than Muslims are all alike.

Wendy P.

There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown)

[billvon 3,114]

>This fetal genocide we are engaged in has to be one of the largest "politically
>correct" mass exterminations of all time.

And there is a link between statements like that and Christian terrorism.

[rushmc 23]

wmw999

He probably doesn't draw them to every single Muslim. That'd be like drawing the line from Westboro Baptist Church to every single Baptist. Baptists aren't all alike anyore than Muslims are all alike.

Wendy P.

Hmmmmm

So double standards exist for straight lines too.....

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[wolfriverjoe 1,523]

billvon

>This fetal genocide we are engaged in has to be one of the largest "politically
>correct" mass exterminations of all time.

And there is a link between statements like that and Christian terrorism.

And like the term "infanticide", the antis are using big, scary words that are pretty clearly defined, with the usage and the actual defininition miles apart.

Fetal genocide? What particular ethnicity is being targeted? Admittedly, the poor and minorities tend to have higher rates, but they also tend to have higher birth rates. And don't conservatives rail against the "welfare queens" who have more kids in order to get more welfare?

Mass extermination? Each abortion is one woman deciding not to carry a child to term. Even if a woman has multiple abortions, no individual person comes anywhere near "mass extermination" numbers. Probably not even close to "mass murderer" levels.

"There are NO situations which do not call for a French Maid outfit." Lucky McSwervy

"~ya don't GET old by being weak & stupid!" - Airtwardo

[maadmax 0]

billvon

>This fetal genocide we are engaged in has to be one of the largest "politically
>correct" mass exterminations of all time.

And there is a link between statements like that and Christian terrorism.

Damn , I have come to expect much more insightful statements from you than something like that. That is like equating all abortionists with nazis because they use death as a final solution to their imagined problems. Recognizing the insanity that one uses to justify the evils of abortion does not make one a terrorist.

...

[wmw999 2,587]

I'm not sure I understand. Gowlerk (who turtlespeed asked about straight lines) is unlikely to consider Muslims automatically suspect. Where is the double standard?

Wendy P.

There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown)

[gowlerk 2,275]

wmw999

I'm not sure I understand. Gowlerk (who turtlespeed asked about straight lines) is unlikely to consider Muslims automatically suspect. Where is the double standard?

Wendy P.

It's just rushmc being obtuse and pretending not to understand again. It's his favourite tactic. Someone talks about apples, he compares them to oranges, and then tries to get someone to play his game with him. Waste of time to answer him.

Always remember the brave children who died defending your right to bear arms. Freedom is not free.

[JerryBaumchen 1,466]

Hi Ken,

Quote

pretending not to understand

You sure about that?

Jerry Baumchen

[normiss 893]

Well played Jerry!

[Stumpy 284]

JerryBaumchen

Hi Ken,

Quote

pretending not to understand

You sure about that?

Jerry Baumchen

Yeah I'm in two minds as well. Either way, same end result.

Never try to eat more than you can lift

[rushmc 23]

wmw999

I'm not sure I understand. Gowlerk (who turtlespeed asked about straight lines) is unlikely to consider Muslims automatically suspect. Where is the double standard?

Wendy P.

Violent speak from Imams is some how sometbing less to be considered if acted upon. Truthful videos of the killing of the unborn is more of a straight line. Even though no where in those videos did any speak of shooting any one

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[rushmc 23]

gowlerk

***I'm not sure I understand. Gowlerk (who turtlespeed asked about straight lines) is unlikely to consider Muslims automatically suspect. Where is the double standard?

Wendy P.

It's just rushmc being obtuse and pretending not to understand again. It's his favourite tactic. Someone talks about apples, he compares them to oranges, and then tries to get someone to play his game with him. Waste of time to answer him.



A classic leftwing tactic. Dont like the point, belittle that person

You have not been here long enough to know that does not work on me.

Anyway, see my reply to Wendy, who IS worth replying too because she gives something you and those like you rarely give. Which is respect. Something you no longer deserve

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[tkhayes 348]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gIlPdyrvEfw

like this guy you mean?

[jakee 1,594]

rushmc

*********

Quote

I suppose you are going to lump Syed Ramook and draw a strait line to all Muslims too.

I don't know who that is, and Google was no help. You may misspelled him name? But in any case, yes, I do draw a straight line from Islamic leaders who spew hatred and preach violence to those Muslims who practice violence. It's the same principle. You've got it.

Yes, evidently auto correct is versatile.

It should be Syed Farook

So. Straight line?

I wonder if he draws a straight line from the Imams who preach killing the Jews and all non-believers?

One of these days you really, really should learn how to read english.

Do you want to have an ideagasm?

[kallend 2,147]

rushmc

You have not been here long enough to know that does not work on me.

Dunning and Kruger strike again.

...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

[winsor 236]

kallend

***

You have not been here long enough to know that does not work on me.

Dunning and Kruger strike again.

I am an excellent driver.

[billvon 3,114]

> That is like equating all abortionists with nazis because they use death as a
>final solution to their imagined problems.

No. There is a difference between "equating" and a link. Some examples:

There is a link between incendiary statements by Muslim leaders like Khalid Muhammad and Islamic violence. That does not mean that Khalid Muhammad is the same as Islamic terrorists.

There is a link between Donald Trump's hateful speech and violence against people who disagree with him at his rallies, and violence against Muslims in general. That does not mean that Donald Trump is the same as the people planning to bomb mosques or beating up people at his rallies.

There is a link between the incendiary speech used by some pro-life people and the violence and terrorism that right wingers have perpetrated at abortion clinics. That does not mean that the people using the incendiary speech are the same as the bombers and terrorists.

>Recognizing the insanity that one uses to justify the evils of abortion does not
>make one a terrorist.

Correct. However, using intentionally emotional and incendiary speech in an attempt to elicit angry reactions can encourage those angry (and violent) reactions. Don't like terrorism? Don't encourage it.

[gowlerk 2,275]

Quote

A classic leftwing tactic. Dont like the point, belittle that personLaugh

Classic tactic is happening here. In the middle of an abortion debate, when you don't have an answer or anything meaningful to say, change the subject to Muslims.

Always remember the brave children who died defending your right to bear arms. Freedom is not free.

[rushmc 23]

gowlerk

Quote

A classic leftwing tactic. Dont like the point, belittle that personLaugh

Classic tactic is happening here. In the middle of an abortion debate, when you don't have an answer or anything meaningful to say, change the subject to Muslims.

And who brought up the nut?

Look in the mirror dude

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[kallend 2,147]

rushmc

***

Quote

A classic leftwing tactic. Dont like the point, belittle that personLaugh

Classic tactic is happening here. In the middle of an abortion debate, when you don't have an answer or anything meaningful to say, change the subject to Muslims.

And who drought uo the nut?

Look in the mirror dude

One of these days you really, really should learn how to write English.

...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.